Bayer CropScience Limited

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 670.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹2,292.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 670.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹2,294.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 635.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while UPL.NS trades at ₹645.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 505.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while FACT.NS trades at ₹775.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is 1952.62. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check FACT.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 505.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while FACT.BO trades at ₹772.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 1952.25. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 462.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹3,114.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 462.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹3,120.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹413.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 203.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹412.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 38.24. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 182.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹455.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 182B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹455.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS and ATUL7.BO have similar daily volatility (1.42).Check ATUL7.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹885.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹1,175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹1,175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹117.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹117.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while RCF.NS trades at ₹129.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while RCF.BO trades at ₹128.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹172.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹172.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹584.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.87. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹279.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹279.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,093.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,103.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹823.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹464.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NFL.BO trades at ₹77.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NFL.NS trades at ₹78.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,298.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹504.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹136.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is -68.65. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹135.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -68.59. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹204.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 201.35. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹204.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 200.15. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹626.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹622.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while IPL.NS trades at ₹158.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while IPL.BO trades at ₹159.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹69.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹69.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹623.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹625.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,574.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,584.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MOL.BO trades at ₹51.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MOL.NS trades at ₹51.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹69.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹69.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹23.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹226.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹91.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹424.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹210.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -13.99. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹208.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹235.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹235.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while KSE.BO trades at ₹214.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹163.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.51. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹17.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹17.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹273.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹58.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹58.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹134.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹133.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SHIVALIK.NS trades at ₹292.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SHIVALIK.NS's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHIVALIK.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SHIVALIK.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹340.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹315.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹63.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹141.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹155.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹147.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹145.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹29.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹146.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹146.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -152.67. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 256.00. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 252.71. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SPTRSHI.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SPTRSHI.BO trades at ₹44.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SPTRSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 52.79. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPTRSHI.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SPTRSHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SPTRSHI.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while MSL.BO trades at ₹140.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MSL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹30.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹460.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, SSLEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while SSLEL.BO trades at ₹270.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas SSLEL.BO's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSLEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to SSLEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SSLEL.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is 156.25. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, INDSUCR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while INDSUCR.BO trades at ₹74.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas INDSUCR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDSUCR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INDSUCR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INDSUCR.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NARMADA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NARMADA.BO trades at ₹32.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NARMADA.BO's P/E ratio is 81.68. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NARMADA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NARMADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NARMADA.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, NARMADA.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while NARMADA.NS trades at ₹32.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas NARMADA.NS's P/E ratio is 81.60. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NARMADA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NARMADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NARMADA.NS's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, PARVATI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while PARVATI.BO trades at ₹8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas PARVATI.BO's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PARVATI.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PARVATI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PARVATI.BO's competition here

BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 215.7B. In comparison, BNALTD.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,797.10, while BNALTD.BO trades at ₹390.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 32.15, whereas BNALTD.BO's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BNALTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BNALTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BNALTD.BO's competition here