CBL International Limited
CBL International Limited BANL Peers
See (BANL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BANL | $0.95 | -5.02% | 26.12M | -6.78 | -$0.14 | N/A |
ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.25B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.22% |
EP-PC | $49.07 | +0.14% | 109.03B | N/A | N/A | +4.84% |
ENB | $44.94 | +0.20% | 97.98B | 23.28 | $1.93 | +4.25% |
WMB | $58.53 | -0.44% | 71.47B | 31.47 | $1.86 | +3.30% |
EPD | $32.56 | +0.45% | 70.61B | 12.19 | $2.67 | +6.53% |
KMI | $28.02 | -0.27% | 62.25B | 24.15 | $1.16 | +4.13% |
ET | $18.01 | +0.31% | 61.79B | 13.64 | $1.32 | +7.22% |
OKE | $84.71 | -1.12% | 52.91B | 16.54 | $5.12 | +4.79% |
MPLX | $51.78 | -0.61% | 52.86B | 11.96 | $4.33 | +7.21% |
Stock Comparison
BANL vs ET-PE Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs EP-PC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 109.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while EP-PC trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ENB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 97.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ENB trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs WMB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 71.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while WMB trades at $58.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs EPD Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 70.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while EPD trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs KMI Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 62.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while KMI trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ET Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 61.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ET trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs OKE Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 52.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while OKE trades at $84.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs MPLX Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 52.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while MPLX trades at $51.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs LNG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 51.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while LNG trades at $232.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TRP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 51.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TRP trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ET-PD Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ET-PC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ENBA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ET-PI Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ET-PI trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TRGP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 35.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TRGP trades at $164.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs CQP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 28.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while CQP trades at $58.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CQP's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs VG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 24.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while VG trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs PBA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while PBA trades at $37.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs WES Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 14.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while WES trades at $39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs MMP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs PAA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 12.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while PAA trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DTM Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DTM trades at $103.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs AM Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while AM trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs VNOM Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while VNOM trades at $41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DCP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs HESM Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while HESM trades at $38.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DCP-PC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ENLC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs ETRN Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLNG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLNG trades at $39.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 81.88. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs FRO Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while FRO trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs PAGP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while PAGP trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs EURN Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs CEQP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NS Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NS-PA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NS-PB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs KNTK Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while KNTK trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 47.32. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs HEP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NS-PC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs RTLR Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs SEAL-PB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DKL Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DKL trades at $41.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs SEAL-PA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs STNG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while STNG trades at $41.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NSS Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs INSW Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while INSW trades at $38.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DHT Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DHT trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GEL Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GEL trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TRMD Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TRMD trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLP trades at $48.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TNK Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TNK trades at $45.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLOG-PA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs FLNG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while FLNG trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLP-PA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs CEQP-P Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs LPG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while LPG trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TNP-PE Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NVGS Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 989.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NVGS trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLP-PB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 870.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLP-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TEN-PE Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 785.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TEN-PE trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TK Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 705.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TK trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs OSG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TEN Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 551.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TEN trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TNP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs PBT Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 510.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while PBT trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NGL Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 485.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NGL trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NGL-PB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 452.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NGL-PB trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs NGL-PC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 434.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while NGL-PC trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLOP-PC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 416.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLOP-PC trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.82. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLOP-PB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 416.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.73. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLOP-PA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 405.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -57.24. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs SMLP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DSSI Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs SMC Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 359.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while SMC trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs SNMP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TNP-PF Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs TNP-PD Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GPP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GPP's ROE of -14.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs GLOP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs BROG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 152.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while BROG trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DLNG-PA Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 135.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 266.98. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DLNG-PB Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 134.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs DLNG Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 132.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while DLNG trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs MMLP Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 115.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while MMLP trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs PTLE Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 19.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while PTLE trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs MARPS Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while MARPS trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs RBNE Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 6.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while RBNE trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is more volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.
BANL vs BROGW Comparison
BANL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANL stands at 26.12M. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61450.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANL is priced at $0.95, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.78, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BANL is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANL.