Braskem S.A.
Braskem S.A. BAK Peers
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $3.61 | -0.69% | 1.50B | -0.87 | -$4.15 | N/A |
| DOW | $30.18 | +0.94% | 21.33B | 75.45 | $0.40 | +9.27% |
| CE | $53.56 | +2.59% | 5.86B | -3.54 | -$15.12 | +2.75% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.70B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $33.57 | +0.24% | 2.26B | 10.97 | $3.06 | +2.20% |
| HUN | $12.67 | +2.22% | 2.20B | -16.24 | -$0.78 | +7.92% |
| TROX | $5.43 | +0.84% | 859.66M | -5.71 | -$0.95 | +9.17% |
| WLKP | $22.72 | +0.04% | 800.62M | 15.25 | $1.49 | +8.34% |
| ASIX | $23.51 | +1.21% | 630.37M | 7.51 | $3.13 | +2.72% |
| ASPI | $7.29 | +14.62% | 547.20M | -11.57 | -$0.63 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs DOW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 21.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while DOW trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is 75.45. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to DOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs CE Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while CE trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs UNVR Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs MEOH Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while MEOH trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs HUN Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while HUN trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -16.24. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs TROX Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 859.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while TROX trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs WLKP Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 800.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while WLKP trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ASIX Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 630.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while ASIX trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ASPI Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 547.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while ASPI trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs LXU Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 516.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while LXU trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is -19.42. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to LXU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs SIRE Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs VHI Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 433.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while VHI trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs CINR Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs RYAM Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 279.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while RYAM trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FF Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 182.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while FF trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -29.68. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ORGN Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 65.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while ORGN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FMST Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 24.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while FMST trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 5.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while ORGNW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.50B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 3.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.61, while FMSTW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.87, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.