Braskem S.A.
Braskem S.A. (BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $3.29 | +1.54% | 1.3B | -0.79 | -$4.18 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DOW | $25.51 | +1.76% | 18B | -18.21 | -$1.40 | +10.95% |
| CE | $58.70 | +2.80% | 6.4B | -3.88 | -$15.12 | +2.48% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $34.27 | +2.27% | 2.3B | 11.20 | $3.06 | +2.16% |
| HUN | $11.19 | +2.85% | 1.9B | -14.34 | -$0.78 | +8.89% |
| TROX | $5.82 | +3.56% | 923.8M | -6.14 | -$0.95 | +8.56% |
| ASPI | $10.47 | +8.39% | 878.2M | -17.75 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| WLKP | $22.07 | +0.23% | 776.3M | 14.79 | $1.49 | +8.53% |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs SHLM Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here
BAK vs DOW Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while DOW trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here
BAK vs CE Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while CE trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CE's competition here
BAK vs UNVR Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here
BAK vs MEOH Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while MEOH trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here
BAK vs HUN Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while HUN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.34. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here
BAK vs TROX Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 923.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while TROX trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here
BAK vs ASPI Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 878.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while ASPI trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASPI's competition here
BAK vs WLKP Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 776.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while WLKP trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here
BAK vs LXU Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 612.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while LXU trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to LXU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here
BAK vs ASIX Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 588M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while ASIX trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASIX's competition here
BAK vs VHI Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 503.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while VHI trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here
BAK vs SIRE Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here
BAK vs CINR Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here
BAK vs RYAM Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 287.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while RYAM trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check RYAM's competition here
BAK vs FF Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while FF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FF's competition here
BAK vs ORGN Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while ORGN trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGN's competition here
BAK vs FMST Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while FMST trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMST's competition here
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while ORGNW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while FMSTW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMSTW's competition here
BAK vs MKD Comparison July 2025
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.29, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +4.14%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here