Braskem S.A.
Braskem S.A. BAK Peers
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $3.35 | +1.52% | 577.1M | -0.79 | -$4.24 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +7.12% |
| DOW | $28.73 | +3.23% | 20.3B | 71.80 | $0.40 | +9.79% |
| CE | $60.62 | +4.28% | 6.6B | -4.01 | -$15.12 | +2.40% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $34.22 | +1.27% | 2.3B | 11.18 | $3.06 | +2.17% |
| HUN | $11.32 | +2.35% | 2B | -14.50 | -$0.78 | +8.81% |
| TROX | $5.53 | +2.41% | 877.1M | -5.83 | -$0.95 | +9.00% |
| WLKP | $22.38 | +0.63% | 788.3M | 15.01 | $1.49 | +8.49% |
| ASIX | $25.10 | +1.23% | 672.7M | 8.02 | $3.13 | +2.55% |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs SHLM Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs DOW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while DOW trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is 71.80. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to DOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs CE Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while CE trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs UNVR Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs MEOH Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while MEOH trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs HUN Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while HUN trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs TROX Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 877.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while TROX trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs WLKP Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 788.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while WLKP trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ASIX Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 672.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while ASIX trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs LXU Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while LXU trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is -22.18. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to LXU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ASPI Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 588M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while ASPI trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs VHI Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 515M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while VHI trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs SIRE Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs CINR Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs RYAM Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 274.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while RYAM trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FF Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 180.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while FF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ORGN Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while ORGN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FMST Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while FMST trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while FMSTW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while ORGNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.
BAK vs MKD Comparison
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 577.1M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.35, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.79, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +27.62%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.