Braskem S.A.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BAK
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BAK
Braskem S.A. (BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $3.31 | -8.31% | 1.3B | -0.69 | -$4.77 | N/A |
| DOW | $40.56 | -2.03% | 29.1B | -10.96 | -$3.70 | +4.31% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| CE | $63.79 | -0.42% | 7B | -6.11 | -$10.44 | +0.19% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $61.57 | +2.86% | 4.8B | 66.20 | $0.93 | +1.20% |
| HUN | $12.54 | -2.87% | 2.2B | -7.89 | -$1.59 | +5.36% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TROX | $9.24 | +0.65% | 1.5B | -3.11 | -$2.97 | +2.98% |
| LXU | $15.00 | +0.60% | 1.1B | 44.10 | $0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs DOW Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while DOW trades at $40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here
BAK vs SHLM Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here
BAK vs CE Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while CE trades at $63.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CE's competition here
BAK vs UNVR Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here
BAK vs MEOH Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while MEOH trades at $61.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 66.20. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here
BAK vs HUN Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while HUN trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here
BAK vs AACQU Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check AACQU's competition here
BAK vs TROX Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while TROX trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here
BAK vs LXU Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while LXU trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 44.10. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here
BAK vs WLKP Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 783.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while WLKP trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here
BAK vs ASIX Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 661.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while ASIX trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASIX's competition here
BAK vs RYAM Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 655.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while RYAM trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check RYAM's competition here
BAK vs SIRE Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here
BAK vs CINR Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here
BAK vs ASPI Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 393.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while ASPI trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASPI's competition here
BAK vs VHI Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while VHI trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here
BAK vs FF Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while FF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FF's competition here
BAK vs FMST Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while FMST trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMST's competition here
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while FMSTW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMSTW's competition here
BAK vs ORGN Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while ORGN trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGN's competition here
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 308.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here
BAK vs OCIP Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check OCIP's competition here
BAK vs MKD Comparison April 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.31, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.45%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here