Braskem S.A.
Braskem S.A. (BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $3.89 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -1.52 | -$2.55 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| DOW | $31.39 | +0.00% | 21.9B | -8.25 | -$3.70 | +6.90% |
| CE | $54.92 | +0.00% | 5.9B | -1.93 | -$28.07 | +0.22% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $49.32 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 16.57 | $2.98 | +1.50% |
| HUN | $12.69 | +0.00% | 2.2B | -7.32 | -$1.72 | +6.63% |
| TROX | $6.95 | +0.07% | 1.1B | -3.33 | -$2.05 | +5.08% |
| WLKP | $20.94 | +0.00% | 747.2M | 15.25 | $1.39 | +8.87% |
| LXU | $9.99 | +0.03% | 721.6M | -1003.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs SHLM Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here
BAK vs DOW Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while DOW trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here
BAK vs CE Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while CE trades at $54.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CE's competition here
BAK vs UNVR Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here
BAK vs MEOH Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while MEOH trades at $49.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here
BAK vs HUN Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while HUN trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here
BAK vs TROX Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while TROX trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here
BAK vs WLKP Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while WLKP trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here
BAK vs LXU Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 721.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while LXU trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is -1003.00. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to LXU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here
BAK vs RYAM Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while RYAM trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check RYAM's competition here
BAK vs ASIX Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 504.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while ASIX trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASIX's competition here
BAK vs SIRE Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here
BAK vs ASPI Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 485.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while ASPI trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASPI's competition here
BAK vs VHI Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 413.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while VHI trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here
BAK vs CINR Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here
BAK vs FF Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 189.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while FF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FF's competition here
BAK vs FMST Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while FMST trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -22.90. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMST's competition here
BAK vs ORGN Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while ORGN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGN's competition here
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while FMSTW trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMSTW's competition here
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 455.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here
BAK vs MKD Comparison February 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.89, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here