Braskem S.A.
Braskem S.A. (BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $4.49 | -5.08% | 1.7B | -1.71 | -$2.56 | N/A |
| DOW | $36.12 | -3.89% | 26.3B | -9.90 | -$3.70 | +4.76% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| CE | $56.59 | -5.05% | 6.3B | -5.53 | -$10.44 | +0.21% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $50.79 | -12.52% | 4B | 16.38 | $3.16 | +1.41% |
| HUN | $11.94 | -6.12% | 2.1B | -7.58 | -$1.59 | +5.60% |
| TROX | $6.80 | +0.07% | 1.1B | -2.35 | -$2.97 | +3.90% |
| LXU | $14.84 | -3.89% | 1.1B | 43.90 | $0.34 | N/A |
| WLKP | $22.14 | -2.62% | 785.8M | 16.16 | $1.38 | +8.43% |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs DOW Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while DOW trades at $36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here
BAK vs SHLM Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here
BAK vs CE Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while CE trades at $56.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CE's competition here
BAK vs UNVR Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here
BAK vs MEOH Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while MEOH trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here
BAK vs HUN Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while HUN trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here
BAK vs TROX Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while TROX trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here
BAK vs LXU Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while LXU trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 43.90. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here
BAK vs WLKP Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 785.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while WLKP trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here
BAK vs RYAM Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 758.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while RYAM trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check RYAM's competition here
BAK vs ASIX Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 553.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while ASIX trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASIX's competition here
BAK vs SIRE Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here
BAK vs ASPI Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 493.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while ASPI trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASPI's competition here
BAK vs CINR Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here
BAK vs VHI Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 388.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while VHI trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here
BAK vs FF Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while FF trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FF's competition here
BAK vs FMST Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while FMST trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -20.90. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMST's competition here
BAK vs ORGN Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while ORGN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGN's competition here
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while FMSTW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMSTW's competition here
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 499.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here
BAK vs MKD Comparison March 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $4.49, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.71, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here