Evoqua Water Technologies Corp.
Evoqua Water Technologies Corp. AQUA Peers
See (AQUA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| VLTO | $102.54 | +0.42% | 25.4B | 29.30 | $3.50 | +0.41% |
| FSS | $109.00 | +0.93% | 6.6B | 31.97 | $3.41 | +0.48% |
| ZWS | $36.79 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 38.36 | $0.96 | +0.95% |
| PCTTU | $22.85 | +4.01% | 3.2B | -39.73 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ATMU | $38.32 | +2.62% | 3.2B | 17.26 | $2.22 | +0.52% |
| PCT | $16.14 | -1.13% | 2.9B | -13.68 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| CECO | $32.11 | +1.77% | 1.1B | 24.70 | $1.30 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $5.60 | -0.53% | 1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ERII | $13.67 | +0.89% | 745M | 36.95 | $0.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AQUA vs VLTO Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while VLTO trades at $102.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs FSS Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while FSS trades at $109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs ZWS Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ZWS trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs PCTTU Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCTTU trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs ATMU Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ATMU trades at $38.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs PCT Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCT trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs CECO Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CECO trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs PCTTW Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while PCTTW trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs ERII Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 745M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ERII trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs CECE Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs ARQ Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ARQ trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -111.60. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs ADES Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs FTEK Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while FTEK trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -29.89. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs SCWO Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SCWO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs CLIR Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CLIR trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs BHTG Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs ZONE Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while ZONE trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs LIQT Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while LIQT trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs TOMZ Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while TOMZ trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA and TOMZ have similar daily volatility (3.47).
AQUA vs DEVS Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while DEVS trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs CLWT Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while CLWT trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs MKUL Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs RAINW Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while RAINW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAINW's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs SPECW Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs SPEC Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs AERC Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.
AQUA vs NEWA Comparison
AQUA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQUA stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQUA is priced at $49.88, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQUA currently has a P/E ratio of 77.94, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, AQUA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AQUA is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQUA.