China Southern Airlines Company Limited
China Southern Airlines Company Limited ZNH Peers
See (ZNH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZNH | $33.08 | +0.06% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DAL | $50.58 | -4.56% | 33.02B | 8.97 | $5.64 | +1.18% |
| UAL | $78.99 | -4.37% | 25.80B | 7.19 | $10.99 | N/A |
| LUV | $31.38 | +0.29% | 17.88B | 35.26 | $0.89 | +2.29% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.93B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| PAC | $219.75 | +2.23% | 11.18B | 24.02 | $9.15 | +3.31% |
| LTM | $36.29 | +2.95% | 10.97B | 10.22 | $3.55 | +1.77% |
| ASR | $345.25 | +2.00% | 10.47B | 14.88 | $23.21 | +3.51% |
| AAL | $11.84 | -3.74% | 7.81B | 11.84 | $1.00 | N/A |
| ALK | $54.16 | -1.31% | 6.57B | 19.48 | $2.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZNH vs DAL Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 33.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while DAL trades at $50.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs UAL Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 25.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while UAL trades at $78.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs LUV Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 17.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while LUV trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs CEA Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs PAC Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while PAC trades at $219.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs LTM Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while LTM trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs ASR Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 10.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while ASR trades at $345.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs AAL Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while AAL trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs ALK Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while ALK trades at $54.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs JOBY Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while JOBY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs JOBY-WT Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs RYAAY Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while RYAAY trades at $50.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs OMAB Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while OMAB trades at $100.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs GOL Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs CPA Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while CPA trades at $101.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs PBI-PB Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while PBI-PB trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs CAAP Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while CAAP trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs SKYW Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while SKYW trades at $85.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs AAWW Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs JBLU Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while JBLU trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs ATSG Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs UP Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while UP trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs ALGT Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while ALGT trades at $56.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs ULCC Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 963.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while ULCC trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs HA Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HA's ROE of -11.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs SNCY Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 665.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while SNCY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs VLRS Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 502.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while VLRS trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs ASLE Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 332.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while ASLE trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -56.73. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs BLDE Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 280.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while BLDE trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs BLDEW Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 257.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while BLDEW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs FLYX Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 231.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while FLYX trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs SAVE Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs MATH Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 100.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while MATH trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs FLYY Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 94.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while FLYY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FLYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs AZUL Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 61.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while AZUL trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs SRFM Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 51.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while SRFM trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs MESA Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 40.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while MESA trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MESA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs SOAR Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 4.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while SOAR trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.
ZNH vs FLYX-WT Comparison
ZNH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZNH stands at N/A. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ZNH is priced at $33.08, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZNH's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZNH is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZNH.