Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (AAWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AAWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAWW | $102.48 | +0.02% | 2.9B | 9.73 | $10.53 | N/A |
| DAL | $92.57 | +0.50% | 60.8B | 13.51 | $6.85 | +0.81% |
| UAL | $136.11 | +1.12% | 44.2B | 12.44 | $10.94 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $64.49 | +0.50% | 33.6B | 8.41 | $7.67 | +1.53% |
| LUV | $51.91 | -0.35% | 25.4B | 33.06 | $1.57 | +1.39% |
| LTM | $58.73 | +3.22% | 17.2B | 10.12 | $5.81 | +2.63% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| PAC | $252.90 | +0.27% | 13.1B | 22.58 | $11.16 | +4.84% |
| AAL | $17.87 | +1.71% | 11.8B | 33.09 | $0.54 | N/A |
| ASR | $308.43 | -0.38% | 9.3B | 17.16 | $17.99 | +6.91% |
Stock Comparison
AAWW vs DAL Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while DAL trades at $92.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check DAL's competition here
AAWW vs UAL Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while UAL trades at $136.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check UAL's competition here
AAWW vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while RYAAY trades at $64.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check RYAAY's competition here
AAWW vs LUV Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while LUV trades at $51.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check LUV's competition here
AAWW vs LTM Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while LTM trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check LTM's competition here
AAWW vs CEA Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check CEA's competition here
AAWW vs PAC Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while PAC trades at $252.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check PAC's competition here
AAWW vs AAL Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while AAL trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check AAL's competition here
AAWW vs ASR Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ASR trades at $308.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ASR's competition here
AAWW vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while JOBY trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check JOBY's competition here
AAWW vs CPA Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while CPA trades at $157.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check CPA's competition here
AAWW vs ALK Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ALK trades at $53.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ALK's competition here
AAWW vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while OMAB trades at $111.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check OMAB's competition here
AAWW vs GOL Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check GOL's competition here
AAWW vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SKYW trades at $99.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check SKYW's competition here
AAWW vs AERO Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while AERO trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check AERO's competition here
AAWW vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while JBLU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check JBLU's competition here
AAWW vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ALGT trades at $116.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ALGT's competition here
AAWW vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ULCC trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ULCC's competition here
AAWW vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ATSG's competition here
AAWW vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while VLRS trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check VLRS's competition here
AAWW vs HA Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check HA's competition here
AAWW vs RJET Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 892.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while RJET trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check RJET's competition here
AAWW vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check SNCY's competition here
AAWW vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 458.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SRTA trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -37.29. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check SRTA's competition here
AAWW vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check BLDE's competition here
AAWW vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ASLE trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ASLE's competition here
AAWW vs UP Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 303.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while UP trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check UP's competition here
AAWW vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check PACI-WT's competition here
AAWW vs FLYX Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while FLYX trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check FLYX's competition here
AAWW vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check AZUL's competition here
AAWW vs SAVE Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check SAVE's competition here
AAWW vs SRFM Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SRFM trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check SRFM's competition here
AAWW vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check FLYY's competition here
AAWW vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check BLDEW's competition here
AAWW vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
AAWW vs MESA Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check MESA's competition here
AAWW vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 933.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SOAR trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check SOAR's competition here
AAWW vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check SRTAW's competition here
AAWW vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check UP-WT's competition here
AAWW vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ASLEW's competition here
AAWW vs FLAI Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLAI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while FLAI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FLAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is more volatile compared to FLAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check FLAI's competition here
AAWW vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.Check ZNH's competition here