Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. (VLRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VLRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLRS | $7.77 | +1.44% | 890.1M | -7.24 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| DAL | $84.54 | +0.44% | 55.6B | 13.31 | $6.35 | +0.92% |
| UAL | $117.52 | +1.83% | 38.1B | 10.74 | $10.94 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $58.91 | -5.85% | 30.6B | 7.68 | $7.67 | +1.56% |
| LUV | $48.34 | +0.54% | 23.6B | 30.80 | $1.57 | +1.50% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $51.74 | -1.56% | 14.9B | 8.90 | $5.81 | +2.90% |
| PAC | $217.12 | -1.72% | 11.3B | 19.27 | $11.26 | +2.04% |
| AAL | $15.14 | +1.07% | 10B | 28.04 | $0.54 | N/A |
| ASR | $274.37 | -1.91% | 8.2B | 15.24 | $17.99 | +7.90% |
Stock Comparison
VLRS vs DAL Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while DAL trades at $84.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check DAL's competition here
VLRS vs UAL Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while UAL trades at $117.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check UAL's competition here
VLRS vs RYAAY Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while RYAAY trades at $58.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check RYAAY's competition here
VLRS vs LUV Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while LUV trades at $48.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check LUV's competition here
VLRS vs CEA Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check CEA's competition here
VLRS vs LTM Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while LTM trades at $51.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check LTM's competition here
VLRS vs PAC Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while PAC trades at $217.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check PAC's competition here
VLRS vs AAL Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while AAL trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check AAL's competition here
VLRS vs ASR Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ASR trades at $274.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ASR's competition here
VLRS vs JOBY Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while JOBY trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check JOBY's competition here
VLRS vs CPA Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while CPA trades at $139.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check CPA's competition here
VLRS vs ALK Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ALK trades at $46.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ALK's competition here
VLRS vs OMAB Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while OMAB trades at $104.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check OMAB's competition here
VLRS vs GOL Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check GOL's competition here
VLRS vs SKYW Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while SKYW trades at $99.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check SKYW's competition here
VLRS vs AAWW Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check AAWW's competition here
VLRS vs AERO Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while AERO trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check AERO's competition here
VLRS vs JBLU Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while JBLU trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check JBLU's competition here
VLRS vs ALGT Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ALGT trades at $102.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ALGT's competition here
VLRS vs ATSG Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ATSG's competition here
VLRS vs ULCC Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ULCC trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ULCC's competition here
VLRS vs HA Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check HA's competition here
VLRS vs AZUL Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 879.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while AZUL trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check AZUL's competition here
VLRS vs SNCY Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check SNCY's competition here
VLRS vs RJET Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 835.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while RJET trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check RJET's competition here
VLRS vs BLDE Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check BLDE's competition here
VLRS vs ASLE Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ASLE trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ASLE's competition here
VLRS vs UP Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while UP trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check UP's competition here
VLRS vs PACI-WT Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check PACI-WT's competition here
VLRS vs SAVE Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check SAVE's competition here
VLRS vs FLYX Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while FLYX trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check FLYX's competition here
VLRS vs SRFM Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while SRFM trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check SRFM's competition here
VLRS vs FLYY Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check FLYY's competition here
VLRS vs BLDEW Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check BLDEW's competition here
VLRS vs FLYX-WT Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
VLRS vs MESA Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check MESA's competition here
VLRS vs SOAR Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 754.6K. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while SOAR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check SOAR's competition here
VLRS vs SRTAW Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check SRTAW's competition here
VLRS vs FLAI Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, FLAI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while FLAI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas FLAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FLAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to FLAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check FLAI's competition here
VLRS vs ASLEW Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ASLEW's competition here
VLRS vs ZNH Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check ZNH's competition here
VLRS vs UP-WT Comparison July 2026
VLRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLRS stands at 890.1M. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VLRS is priced at $7.77, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLRS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.24, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLRS's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VLRS is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLRS.Check UP-WT's competition here