Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | $238.45 | -2.15% | 12B | 20.68 | $11.53 | +5.13% |
| DAL | $70.23 | -1.85% | 46.2B | 10.26 | $6.85 | +1.06% |
| UAL | $92.85 | -3.30% | 30.1B | 8.31 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $53.36 | -3.35% | 28B | 10.64 | $5.01 | +1.85% |
| LUV | $38.50 | -2.11% | 18.8B | 25.66 | $1.50 | +1.88% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $46.91 | -4.79% | 13.7B | 8.12 | $5.78 | +3.24% |
| JOBY | $10.36 | -2.63% | 10.2B | -9.09 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| ASR | $296.14 | -1.66% | 8.9B | 15.62 | $18.95 | +13.93% |
| AAL | $12.31 | -3.07% | 8.1B | 39.71 | $0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAC vs DAL Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while DAL trades at $70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check DAL's competition here
PAC vs UAL Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while UAL trades at $92.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check UAL's competition here
PAC vs RYAAY Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while RYAAY trades at $53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check RYAAY's competition here
PAC vs LUV Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while LUV trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check LUV's competition here
PAC vs CEA Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check CEA's competition here
PAC vs LTM Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while LTM trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check LTM's competition here
PAC vs JOBY Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while JOBY trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check JOBY's competition here
PAC vs ASR Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ASR trades at $296.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ASR's competition here
PAC vs AAL Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while AAL trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 39.71. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AAL's competition here
PAC vs CPA Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while CPA trades at $131.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check CPA's competition here
PAC vs OMAB Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while OMAB trades at $102.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check OMAB's competition here
PAC vs GOL Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check GOL's competition here
PAC vs ALK Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ALK trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 75.41. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ALK's competition here
PAC vs CAAP Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while CAAP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check CAAP's competition here
PAC vs SKYW Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while SKYW trades at $81.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SKYW's competition here
PAC vs AAWW Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AAWW's competition here
PAC vs AERO Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while AERO trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AERO's competition here
PAC vs PBI-PB Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while PBI-PB trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check PBI-PB's competition here
PAC vs JBLU Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while JBLU trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check JBLU's competition here
PAC vs ATSG Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ATSG's competition here
PAC vs ALGT Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ALGT trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -39.01. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ALGT's competition here
PAC vs ULCC Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ULCC trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ULCC's competition here
PAC vs JOBY-WT Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 966.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
PAC vs RJET Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 946.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while RJET trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check RJET's competition here
PAC vs HA Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check HA's competition here
PAC vs SNCY Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SNCY's competition here
PAC vs VLRS Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while VLRS trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check VLRS's competition here
PAC vs SRTA Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 451.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while SRTA trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -27.47. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SRTA's competition here
PAC vs BLDE Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check BLDE's competition here
PAC vs ASLE Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 302.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ASLE trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ASLE's competition here
PAC vs PACI-WT Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check PACI-WT's competition here
PAC vs FLYX Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while FLYX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check FLYX's competition here
PAC vs UP Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while UP trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check UP's competition here
PAC vs AZUL Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AZUL's competition here
PAC vs SAVE Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SAVE's competition here
PAC vs SRFM Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while SRFM trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SRFM's competition here
PAC vs MATH Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while MATH trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check MATH's competition here
PAC vs FLYY Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check FLYY's competition here
PAC vs BLDEW Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check BLDEW's competition here
PAC vs FLYX-WT Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
PAC vs MESA Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check MESA's competition here
PAC vs SOAR Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 763K. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while SOAR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SOAR's competition here
PAC vs SRTAW Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SRTAW's competition here
PAC vs UP-WT Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check UP-WT's competition here
PAC vs ASLEW Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ASLEW's competition here
PAC vs ZNH Comparison May 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $238.45, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.68, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ZNH's competition here