Yum China Holdings, Inc.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 224.27B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MCD trades at $313.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 91.24B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SBUX trades at $80.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 66.99B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CMG trades at $49.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 58.87B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CMPGY trades at $34.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 42.30. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 57.79B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CMPGF trades at $34.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to CMPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.98B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while YUM trades at $147.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 30.33B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RSTRF trades at $67.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.21B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DRI trades at $198.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.00B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while QSR trades at $67.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.40B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DPZ trades at $478.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while HDALF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to HDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.01B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while TXRH trades at $180.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 10.86B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CAVA trades at $93.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 85.39. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 10.34B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BROS trades at $63.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 186.50. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while WING trades at $267.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while EAT trades at $137.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MDNDF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MDNDF trades at $39.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MDNDF's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MDNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while JBFCY trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to JBFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while JBFCF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to JBFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SHAK trades at $99.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 431.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ATGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CAKE trades at $50.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SKLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while WEN trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DLII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ATGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SGLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ALSSF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ALSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ARHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SG trades at $15.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MBPFF trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MBPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while HELFY trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to HELFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while HLFFF trades at $10.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to HLFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ARCO trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SSPPF trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to SSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DMZPY trades at $7.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is 189.50. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DMZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DPZUF trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is 181.11. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DPZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DMPZF trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to DMPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DPUKY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to DPUKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while HDL trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 53.20. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while PZZA trades at $38.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ELORY trades at $4.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELORY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ELORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while LKNCY trades at $32.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CNNE trades at $18.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while JDWPF trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to JDWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CBRL trades at $46.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 994.54M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while JDWPY trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to JDWPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 961.86M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FWRG trades at $15.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 92.76. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 864.73M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BJRI trades at $39.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 40.73. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.88M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 742.09M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BH-A trades at $1,182.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -87.69. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 741.70M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MTYFF trades at $32.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 119.44. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 739.99M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while KRUS trades at $61.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -66.55. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 739.67M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BH trades at $238.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -89.02. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 718.31M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while PTLO trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.54M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RUTH trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.69M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to RSTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.87M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CHUY trades at $37.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 619.99M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BLMN trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 616.08M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ELROF trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELROF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to ELROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 572.91M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CLLFF trades at $4.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to CLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 531.02M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CFCGF trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 507.67M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while JACK trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502.01M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while TAST trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 405.11M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while NATH trades at $99.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399.04M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to MLYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 372.76M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RICK trades at $42.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 368.44M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FBGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to FBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 350.49M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DIN trades at $22.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 313.55M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while TWNP trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 297.80M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while PBPB trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 296.22M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while VENU trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 291.09M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FMBRY trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FMBRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 285.68M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MARZF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MARZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MARZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 274.02M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MRTPY trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MRTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 272.27M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while LOCO trades at $9.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 258.00M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while PZRIF trades at $10.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to PZRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 248.27M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RTBRF trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to RTBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 234.49M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FRWDF trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FRWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 229.09M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while DENN trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.48M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FRGI trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.50M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BBQ trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.85M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to CRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 156.33M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GENK trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GENK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 120.07M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while STKS trades at $3.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 119.10M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while XIAXF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to XIAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 100.69M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RFGPF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RFGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.58M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while THCHW trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 87.30M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while THCH trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 84.87M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MHGU trades at $13.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHGU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MHGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 81.04M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MHGUP trades at $24.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to MHGUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 55.62M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FATBP trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 55.59M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MB trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.19M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GRIL trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.16M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FATAV trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 53.89M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FATBW trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 50.54M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FATBB trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.49M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to FRHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 49.17M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FAT trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 48.99M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RRGB trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.55M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 44.61M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BDL trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 40.31M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RAVE trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 40.22M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ARKR trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 38.93M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while NDLS trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NDLS's ROE of -4.88%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.40M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to GLLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 26.11M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FCCI trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to FCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 25.93M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while YOSH trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 23.88M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SCUPF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SCUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.41M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MYT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.07M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while MORRF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MORRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to MORRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 19.37M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GTIM trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 16.02M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ODDAF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to ODDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 15.23M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while PC trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -19.03. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 11.52M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CHSN trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 11.28M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while REBN trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.25M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 6.95M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BTBD trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BTB trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while FATBV trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GGLT trades at $499.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GGLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 4.79M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while NROM trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to NROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while COFE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to COFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BFI trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while PNST trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to SCFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952803.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ZAAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 806417.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GAMN trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAMN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GAMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 764233.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BDVB trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BDVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 401756.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while WHCA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHCA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to WHCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 326200.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while KITL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242318.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 139960.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GTEH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTEH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GTEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37272.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BLUU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BLUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 36282.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GMPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to GMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29755.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GASMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to GASMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17240.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BBUCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 11033.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while SWRL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SWRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 9755.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RIBS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to RIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 5136.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while PFSF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PFSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to PFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2722.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while CORG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1683.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while AMHG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to AMHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1436.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while GCFB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCFB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to GCFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while HTRE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to HTRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ONDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70.00. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while ULFS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ULFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, RKLC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while RKLC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas RKLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RKLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to RKLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.

YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.56B. In comparison, LUB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $44.17, while LUB trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.48, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.