Yum China Holdings, Inc.
Yum China Holdings, Inc. YUMC Peers
See (YUMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | $43.98 | +0.74% | 16.4B | 18.40 | $2.39 | +1.83% |
| MCD | $312.94 | -0.29% | 223.8B | 27.62 | $11.33 | +2.77% |
| SBUX | $85.19 | +1.48% | 96.8B | 30.98 | $2.75 | +2.82% |
| CMG | $49.84 | -0.48% | 67.2B | 44.11 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $144.64 | +0.49% | 40.2B | 28.81 | $5.02 | +1.91% |
| DRI | $216.85 | +1.23% | 25.4B | 24.39 | $8.89 | +2.59% |
| QSR | $71.98 | +0.80% | 23.6B | 24.40 | $2.95 | +3.28% |
| DPZ | $466.00 | -1.65% | 16B | 26.72 | $17.44 | +1.35% |
| TXRH | $194.72 | -0.25% | 12.9B | 30.05 | $6.48 | +1.29% |
| BROS | $71.76 | -0.61% | 11.8B | 184.00 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
YUMC vs MCD Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 223.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while MCD trades at $312.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs SBUX Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while SBUX trades at $85.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs CMG Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while CMG trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs YUM Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while YUM trades at $144.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs DRI Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while DRI trades at $216.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs QSR Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while QSR trades at $71.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs DPZ Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while DPZ trades at $466.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs TXRH Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while TXRH trades at $194.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BROS Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BROS trades at $71.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 184.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs WING Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while WING trades at $349.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs CAVA Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while CAVA trades at $81.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 67.70. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs EAT Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while EAT trades at $175.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs SHAK Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while SHAK trades at $128.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 442.67. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs CAKE Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while CAKE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs WEN Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while WEN trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs SG Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while SG trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs ARCO Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while ARCO trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs PZZA Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while PZZA trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs HDL Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while HDL trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs CBRL Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while CBRL trades at $56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs CNNE Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while CNNE trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BJRI Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BJRI trades at $45.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FWRG Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 935M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FWRG trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 90.18. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs TWNPV Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs KRUS Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 806.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while KRUS trades at $66.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -72.52. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs PTLO Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 796.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while PTLO trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BH Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 778.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BH trades at $253.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BH-A Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 770.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BH-A trades at $1,219.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs RUTH Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BLMN Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 649M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BLMN trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs CHUY Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs TAST Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs NATH Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while NATH trades at $104.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs DIN Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 372.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while DIN trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs VENU Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 354.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while VENU trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs JACK Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 352.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while JACK trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs RICK Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while RICK trades at $39.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 45.81. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs PBPB Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 320.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while PBPB trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs LOCO Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while LOCO trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FRGI Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs TWNP Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while TWNP trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs DENN Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while DENN trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BBQ Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs STKS Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while STKS trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs RRGB Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while RRGB trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs THCHW Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs THCH Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while THCH trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs MB Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while MB trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs GRIL Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FATAV Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BDL Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BDL trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FATBP Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FATBP trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FATBW Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FATBW trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FAT Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FAT trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs RAVE Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while RAVE trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs ARKR Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while ARKR trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs NDLS Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while NDLS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FATBB Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FATBB trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs YOSH Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while YOSH trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs MYT Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs GTIM Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while GTIM trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs GENK Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while GENK trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -83.25. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs PC Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while PC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs REBN Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while REBN trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs CHSN Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while CHSN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BTBDW Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BTBDW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BTBD Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BTBD trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BTB Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs FATBV Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs PNST Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while PNST trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BFI Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs BFIIW Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs ONDR Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.
YUMC vs LUB Comparison
YUMC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YUMC stands at 16.4B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YUMC is priced at $43.98, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YUMC currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YUMC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YUMC is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YUMC.