Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NATH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATH | $100.86 | +0.06% | 411.6M | 20.73 | $4.85 | +4.47% |
| MCD | $271.55 | -1.79% | 195.1B | 22.22 | $12.36 | +2.66% |
| SBUX | $107.78 | +1.28% | 120.8B | 50.97 | $2.08 | +2.32% |
| CMG | $36.56 | +5.66% | 45.2B | 31.76 | $1.11 | N/A |
| YUM | $161.91 | -0.30% | 45.1B | 26.17 | $6.25 | +1.77% |
| QSR | $75.79 | +1.13% | 26.1B | 19.86 | $3.79 | +3.36% |
| DRI | $198.38 | -1.75% | 23.4B | 19.17 | $10.66 | +2.98% |
| YUMC | $43.99 | +3.97% | 15B | 16.48 | $2.61 | +2.45% |
| TXRH | $192.07 | +2.69% | 12.5B | 30.27 | $6.26 | +1.51% |
| BROS | $66.23 | +0.89% | 11.7B | 86.62 | $0.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NATH vs MCD Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 195.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while MCD trades at $271.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check MCD's competition here
NATH vs SBUX Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while SBUX trades at $107.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 50.97. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check SBUX's competition here
NATH vs CMG Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while CMG trades at $36.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check CMG's competition here
NATH vs YUM Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while YUM trades at $161.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check YUM's competition here
NATH vs QSR Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while QSR trades at $75.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check QSR's competition here
NATH vs DRI Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while DRI trades at $198.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check DRI's competition here
NATH vs YUMC Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while YUMC trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check YUMC's competition here
NATH vs TXRH Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while TXRH trades at $192.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check TXRH's competition here
NATH vs BROS Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BROS trades at $66.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 86.62. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BROS's competition here
NATH vs DPZ Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while DPZ trades at $308.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check DPZ's competition here
NATH vs CAVA Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while CAVA trades at $72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 138.83. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check CAVA's competition here
NATH vs EAT Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while EAT trades at $187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check EAT's competition here
NATH vs WING Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while WING trades at $149.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check WING's competition here
NATH vs CAKE Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while CAKE trades at $81.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check CAKE's competition here
NATH vs SHAK Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while SHAK trades at $61.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 50.15. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check SHAK's competition here
NATH vs ARCO Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while ARCO trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check ARCO's competition here
NATH vs WEN Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while WEN trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check WEN's competition here
NATH vs BJRI Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BJRI trades at $62.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BJRI's competition here
NATH vs BH Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BH trades at $380.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BH's competition here
NATH vs BH-A Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BH-A trades at $1,919.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BH-A's competition here
NATH vs CBRL Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while CBRL trades at $50.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 93.37. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check CBRL's competition here
NATH vs PZZA Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while PZZA trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check PZZA's competition here
NATH vs SG Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 994M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while SG trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check SG's competition here
NATH vs TWNPV Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check TWNPV's competition here
NATH vs FWRG Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 768.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FWRG trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FWRG's competition here
NATH vs CNNE Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 766.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while CNNE trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check CNNE's competition here
NATH vs BLMN Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 714M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BLMN trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BLMN's competition here
NATH vs HDL Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 712.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while HDL trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check HDL's competition here
NATH vs RUTH Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check RUTH's competition here
NATH vs CHUY Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check CHUY's competition here
NATH vs KRUS Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 627.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while KRUS trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -1291.25. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check KRUS's competition here
NATH vs PBPB Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check PBPB's competition here
NATH vs TAST Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check TAST's competition here
NATH vs LOCO Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 500.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while LOCO trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check LOCO's competition here
NATH vs DIN Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 453.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while DIN trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check DIN's competition here
NATH vs PTLO Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 332.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while PTLO trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check PTLO's competition here
NATH vs DENN Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check DENN's competition here
NATH vs JACK Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while JACK trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check JACK's competition here
NATH vs FRGI Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FRGI's competition here
NATH vs RICK Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while RICK trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 178.13. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check RICK's competition here
NATH vs BBQ Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BBQ's competition here
NATH vs BRCB Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BRCB has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BRCB trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BRCB's P/E ratio is 823.00. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BRCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BRCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BRCB's competition here
NATH vs RRGB Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while RRGB trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check RRGB's competition here
NATH vs BYN-WT Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BYN-WT's competition here
NATH vs VENU Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while VENU trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check VENU's competition here
NATH vs THCHW Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check THCHW's competition here
NATH vs BDL Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BDL trades at $41.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BDL's competition here
NATH vs HCHL Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while HCHL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check HCHL's competition here
NATH vs NDLS Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while NDLS trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check NDLS's competition here
NATH vs MB Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while MB trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to MB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check MB's competition here
NATH vs GENK Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while GENK trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check GENK's competition here
NATH vs STKS Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while STKS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check STKS's competition here
NATH vs THCH Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while THCH trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check THCH's competition here
NATH vs GRIL Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check GRIL's competition here
NATH vs FATAV Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FATAV's competition here
NATH vs RAVE Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while RAVE trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check RAVE's competition here
NATH vs FATBW Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FATBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FATBW's competition here
NATH vs PC Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check PC's competition here
NATH vs MYT Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check MYT's competition here
NATH vs ARKR Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while ARKR trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check ARKR's competition here
NATH vs FATBB Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FATBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FATBB's competition here
NATH vs GTIM Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while GTIM trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check GTIM's competition here
NATH vs YOSH Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check YOSH's competition here
NATH vs REBN Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while REBN trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check REBN's competition here
NATH vs BTBDW Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BTBDW's competition here
NATH vs BTBD Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BTBD trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BTBD's competition here
NATH vs BTB Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BTB's competition here
NATH vs FATBV Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FATBV's competition here
NATH vs TWNP Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check TWNP's competition here
NATH vs FAT Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FAT's competition here
NATH vs BFI Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BFI's competition here
NATH vs FATBP Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FATBP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check FATBP's competition here
NATH vs BFIIW Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BFIIW's competition here
NATH vs ONDR Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check ONDR's competition here
NATH vs ZOES Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check ZOES's competition here
NATH vs PLKI Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check PLKI's competition here
NATH vs PNRA Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check PNRA's competition here
NATH vs LUB Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check LUB's competition here
NATH vs BOBE Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BOBE's competition here
NATH vs COSI Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check COSI's competition here
NATH vs BWLD Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BWLD's competition here
NATH vs SONC Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check SONC's competition here
NATH vs JMBA Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is -131.20. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check JMBA's competition here
NATH vs BOJA Comparison July 2026
NATH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATH stands at 411.6M. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATH is priced at $100.86, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATH currently has a P/E ratio of 20.73, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, NATH's ROE is -1.79%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NATH is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATH.Check BOJA's competition here