Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while MCD trades at $250.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MCD's ROE of -5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check MCD's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 117.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while SBUX trades at $103.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SBUX's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while YUM trades at $150.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check YUM's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CMG trades at $28.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CMG's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while DRI trades at $216.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DRI's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while YUMC trades at $44.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check YUMC's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while TXRH trades at $174.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TXRH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while DPZ trades at $309.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DPZ's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while EAT trades at $220.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check EAT's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BROS trades at $42.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 50.49. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BROS's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CAVA trades at $54.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 98.68. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CAVA's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CAKE trades at $105.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CAKE's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, JMKE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while JMKE trades at $17.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas JMKE's P/E ratio is -44.71. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JMKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to JMKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check JMKE's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while WING trades at $138.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check WING's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while SHAK trades at $67.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 58.06. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SHAK's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CHA trades at $11.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CHA's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CBRL trades at $70.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 131.24. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CBRL's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while ARCO trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ARCO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while WEN trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check WEN's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while SG trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SG's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BJRI trades at $60.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BJRI's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BH-A trades at $1,887.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BH-A's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BH trades at $384.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TWNPV's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 854.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BLMN trades at $9.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BLMN's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 731.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CNNE trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CNNE's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 712.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FWRG trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 39.83. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FWRG's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while RUTH trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RUTH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CHUY trades at $37.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CHUY's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 615.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while HDL trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check HDL's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 610.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while PZZA trades at $18.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PZZA's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while PBPB trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PBPB's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while TAST trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TAST's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while LOCO trades at $15.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check LOCO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while DIN trades at $34.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DIN's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 418.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while NATH trades at $102.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check NATH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 398.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while KRUS trades at $32.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -819.25. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check KRUS's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while PTLO trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PTLO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while DENN trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DENN's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while PC trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PC's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PC's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 228.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while JACK trades at $11.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check JACK's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FRGI trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FRGI's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while RICK trades at $28.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RICK's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BBQ trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BBQ's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BRCB has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BRCB trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BRCB's P/E ratio is 1020.00. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BRCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BRCB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BRCB's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while RRGB trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RRGB's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BYN-WT's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while THCHW trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check THCHW's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BDL trades at $53.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BDL's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while NDLS trades at $14.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check NDLS's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while VENU trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check VENU's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while HCHL trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check HCHL's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while MB trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MB's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check MB's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while GRIL trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check GRIL's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FATAV trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATAV's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while GENK trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check GENK's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while THCH trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check THCH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FATBW trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FATBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBW's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while STKS trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check STKS's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while RAVE trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RAVE's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while MYT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check MYT's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while HWH trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HWH's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check HWH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FATBB trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FATBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBB's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, CCHH has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while CCHH trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas CCHH's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CCHH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CCHH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CCHH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while ARKR trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ARKR's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, ESYN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while ESYN trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas ESYN's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ESYN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to ESYN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ESYN's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while REBN trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to REBN's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check REBN's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while GTIM trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check GTIM's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BTBD trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BTBD's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BTBDW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BTBDW's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while YOSH trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check YOSH's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BTB trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BTB's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FATBV trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBV's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while TWNP trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TWNP's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FAT trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FAT's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BFI trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BFI's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while FATBP trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FATBP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBP's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, VSTD has a market cap of 560.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while VSTD trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas VSTD's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VSTD's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to VSTD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check VSTD's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BFIIW's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while ONDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ONDR's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while PNRA trades at $314.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PNRA's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BWLD trades at $156.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BWLD's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while ZOES trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is -67.16. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ZOES's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while COSI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check COSI's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BOBE trades at $77.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BOBE's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while LUB trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check LUB's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while BOJA trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BOJA's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while SONC trades at $43.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is 82.06. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SONC's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while JMBA trades at $13.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is -42.53. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check JMBA's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 26B. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $74.52 on the NYSE, while PLKI trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.01, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PLKI's competition here