Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QSR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QSR | $73.44 | -0.98% | 25.5B | 23.61 | $3.11 | +3.42% |
| MCD | $278.61 | -1.84% | 198B | 22.99 | $12.12 | +2.64% |
| SBUX | $100.65 | +0.83% | 114.7B | 76.83 | $1.31 | +2.45% |
| YUM | $151.99 | -1.35% | 41.9B | 24.51 | $6.20 | +1.92% |
| CMG | $32.49 | +1.96% | 41.7B | 29.80 | $1.09 | N/A |
| DRI | $213.45 | +1.00% | 24.4B | 22.49 | $9.49 | +2.81% |
| YUMC | $42.93 | -0.81% | 15B | 16.45 | $2.61 | +2.47% |
| BROS | $70.72 | +7.61% | 12.2B | 112.25 | $0.63 | N/A |
| TXRH | $177.75 | +2.43% | 11.7B | 28.35 | $6.27 | +1.61% |
| DPZ | $312.47 | -0.60% | 10.4B | 17.99 | $17.37 | +2.39% |
Stock Comparison
QSR vs MCD Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 198B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while MCD trades at $278.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check MCD's competition here
QSR vs SBUX Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while SBUX trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 76.83. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SBUX's competition here
QSR vs YUM Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while YUM trades at $151.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check YUM's competition here
QSR vs CMG Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while CMG trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CMG's competition here
QSR vs DRI Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while DRI trades at $213.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DRI's competition here
QSR vs YUMC Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while YUMC trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check YUMC's competition here
QSR vs BROS Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BROS trades at $70.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 112.25. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BROS's competition here
QSR vs TXRH Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while TXRH trades at $177.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TXRH's competition here
QSR vs DPZ Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while DPZ trades at $312.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DPZ's competition here
QSR vs CAVA Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while CAVA trades at $89.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 171.50. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CAVA's competition here
QSR vs EAT Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while EAT trades at $164.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check EAT's competition here
QSR vs WING Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while WING trades at $161.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check WING's competition here
QSR vs CAKE Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while CAKE trades at $77.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CAKE's competition here
QSR vs SHAK Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while SHAK trades at $59.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SHAK's competition here
QSR vs ARCO Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while ARCO trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ARCO's competition here
QSR vs WEN Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while WEN trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check WEN's competition here
QSR vs PZZA Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while PZZA trades at $36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PZZA's competition here
QSR vs BJRI Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BJRI trades at $54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BJRI's competition here
QSR vs SG Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while SG trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas SG's P/E ratio is 74.75. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SG's competition here
QSR vs CBRL Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while CBRL trades at $47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CBRL's competition here
QSR vs BH Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BH trades at $332.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BH's competition here
QSR vs BH-A Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BH-A trades at $1,720.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BH-A's competition here
QSR vs TWNPV Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TWNPV's competition here
QSR vs HDL Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while HDL trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check HDL's competition here
QSR vs FWRG Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 728M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FWRG trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FWRG's competition here
QSR vs CNNE Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 716.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while CNNE trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CNNE's competition here
QSR vs RUTH Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RUTH's competition here
QSR vs BLMN Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 690.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BLMN trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BLMN's competition here
QSR vs CHUY Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CHUY's competition here
QSR vs KRUS Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 602.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while KRUS trades at $49.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -330.80. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check KRUS's competition here
QSR vs PBPB Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PBPB's competition here
QSR vs TAST Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TAST's competition here
QSR vs LOCO Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while LOCO trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check LOCO's competition here
QSR vs DIN Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 433.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while DIN trades at $34.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DIN's competition here
QSR vs NATH Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 416.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while NATH trades at $101.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check NATH's competition here
QSR vs DENN Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check DENN's competition here
QSR vs PTLO Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while PTLO trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PTLO's competition here
QSR vs JACK Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while JACK trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check JACK's competition here
QSR vs FRGI Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FRGI's competition here
QSR vs RICK Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 216.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while RICK trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is -36.24. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RICK's competition here
QSR vs BBQ Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BBQ's competition here
QSR vs VENU Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while VENU trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check VENU's competition here
QSR vs BYN-WT Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BYN-WT's competition here
QSR vs RRGB Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while RRGB trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RRGB's competition here
QSR vs THCHW Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check THCHW's competition here
QSR vs MB Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while MB trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -14.35. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check MB's competition here
QSR vs NDLS Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while NDLS trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check NDLS's competition here
QSR vs BDL Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BDL trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BDL's competition here
QSR vs HCHL Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while HCHL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check HCHL's competition here
QSR vs GENK Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while GENK trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check GENK's competition here
QSR vs STKS Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while STKS trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check STKS's competition here
QSR vs GRIL Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check GRIL's competition here
QSR vs FATAV Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATAV's competition here
QSR vs THCH Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while THCH trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check THCH's competition here
QSR vs RAVE Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while RAVE trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check RAVE's competition here
QSR vs FATBW Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FATBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBW's competition here
QSR vs PC Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PC's competition here
QSR vs MYT Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check MYT's competition here
QSR vs ARKR Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while ARKR trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ARKR's competition here
QSR vs FATBB Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FATBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBB's competition here
QSR vs GTIM Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while GTIM trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check GTIM's competition here
QSR vs YOSH Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check YOSH's competition here
QSR vs REBN Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while REBN trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check REBN's competition here
QSR vs BTBDW Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BTBDW's competition here
QSR vs BTBD Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BTBD trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BTBD's competition here
QSR vs BTB Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BTB's competition here
QSR vs FATBV Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBV's competition here
QSR vs TWNP Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check TWNP's competition here
QSR vs FAT Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FAT's competition here
QSR vs BFI Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BFI's competition here
QSR vs FATBP Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FATBP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check FATBP's competition here
QSR vs BFIIW Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BFIIW's competition here
QSR vs CHSN Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 12.2K. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while CHSN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check CHSN's competition here
QSR vs ONDR Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ONDR's competition here
QSR vs JMBA Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check JMBA's competition here
QSR vs LUB Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check LUB's competition here
QSR vs BWLD Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BWLD's competition here
QSR vs SONC Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check SONC's competition here
QSR vs PLKI Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PLKI's competition here
QSR vs BOBE Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BOBE's competition here
QSR vs BOJA Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check BOJA's competition here
QSR vs COSI Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check COSI's competition here
QSR vs PNRA Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check PNRA's competition here
QSR vs ZOES Comparison June 2026
QSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QSR stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR is priced at $73.44, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QSR currently has a P/E ratio of 23.61, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QSR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.Check ZOES's competition here