FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FAT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FAT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAT | $0.16 | +150.15% | 3M | -0.01 | -$13.15 | N/A |
| MCD | $268.34 | +1.17% | 190.7B | 21.71 | $12.36 | +2.77% |
| SBUX | $104.97 | +1.55% | 119.7B | 50.47 | $2.08 | +2.34% |
| CMG | $33.82 | -9.73% | 43.4B | 30.48 | $1.11 | N/A |
| YUM | $147.68 | -0.75% | 40.7B | 23.62 | $6.25 | +1.98% |
| QSR | $73.88 | +1.29% | 25.6B | 19.49 | $3.79 | +3.45% |
| DRI | $204.57 | -0.81% | 23.4B | 19.18 | $10.66 | +3.00% |
| YUMC | $47.87 | -0.99% | 16.7B | 18.34 | $2.61 | +2.22% |
| TXRH | $208.24 | -1.15% | 13.7B | 33.27 | $6.26 | +1.37% |
| DPZ | $367.63 | +0.88% | 12.2B | 21.16 | $17.37 | +2.03% |
Stock Comparison
McDonald's Corporation (NYSE: MCD)
FAT vs MCD Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 190.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while MCD trades at $268.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to MCD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check MCD's competition here
Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: SBUX)
FAT vs SBUX Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while SBUX trades at $104.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 50.47. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check SBUX's competition here
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE: CMG)
FAT vs CMG Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CMG trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CMG's competition here
Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM)
FAT vs YUM Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while YUM trades at $147.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check YUM's competition here
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR)
FAT vs QSR Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while QSR trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to QSR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check QSR's competition here
Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE: DRI)
FAT vs DRI Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while DRI trades at $204.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DRI's competition here
Yum China Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: YUMC)
FAT vs YUMC Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while YUMC trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check YUMC's competition here
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (NASDAQ: TXRH)
FAT vs TXRH Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while TXRH trades at $208.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TXRH's competition here
Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ: DPZ)
FAT vs DPZ Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while DPZ trades at $367.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DPZ's competition here
Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE: BROS)
FAT vs BROS Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BROS trades at $64.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 82.28. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BROS's competition here
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT)
FAT vs EAT Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while EAT trades at $218.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check EAT's competition here
CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE: CAVA)
FAT vs CAVA Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CAVA trades at $63.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 121.98. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CAVA's competition here
Jersey Mike's Subs Inc. (NYSE: JMKE)
FAT vs JMKE Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, JMKE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while JMKE trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JMKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JMKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to JMKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check JMKE's competition here
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (NASDAQ: CAKE)
FAT vs CAKE Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CAKE trades at $105.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CAKE's competition here
Wingstop Inc. (NASDAQ: WING)
FAT vs WING Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while WING trades at $121.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check WING's competition here
Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE: SHAK)
FAT vs SHAK Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while SHAK trades at $66.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check SHAK's competition here
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: CHA)
FAT vs CHA Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CHA trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CHA's competition here
Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ARCO)
FAT vs ARCO Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while ARCO trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check ARCO's competition here
The Wendy's Company (NASDAQ: WEN)
FAT vs WEN Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while WEN trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check WEN's competition here
BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (NASDAQ: BJRI)
FAT vs BJRI Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BJRI trades at $67.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BJRI's competition here
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (NASDAQ: CBRL)
FAT vs CBRL Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CBRL trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 105.78. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CBRL's competition here
Biglari Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BH-A)
FAT vs BH-A Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BH-A trades at $1,957.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BH-A's competition here
Biglari Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BH)
FAT vs BH Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BH trades at $393.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BH's competition here
Papa John's International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PZZA)
FAT vs PZZA Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while PZZA trades at $30.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PZZA's competition here
Twin Hospitality Group Inc. (NASDAQ: TWNPV)
FAT vs TWNPV Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TWNPV's competition here
SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: HDL)
FAT vs HDL Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 792.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while HDL trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check HDL's competition here
Cannae Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CNNE)
FAT vs CNNE Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CNNE trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CNNE's competition here
First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FWRG)
FAT vs FWRG Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 789.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while FWRG trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FWRG's competition here
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: BLMN)
FAT vs BLMN Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 763.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BLMN trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BLMN's competition here
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RUTH)
FAT vs RUTH Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RUTH's competition here
Sweetgreen, Inc. (NYSE: SG)
FAT vs SG Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 677.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while SG trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check SG's competition here
Chuy's Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHUY)
FAT vs CHUY Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CHUY's competition here
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (NASDAQ: KRUS)
FAT vs KRUS Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 587.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while KRUS trades at $48.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -1209.50. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check KRUS's competition here
Krispy Kreme, Inc. (NASDAQ: DNUT)
FAT vs DNUT Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while DNUT trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DNUT's competition here
Potbelly Corporation (NASDAQ: PBPB)
FAT vs PBPB Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PBPB's competition here
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LOCO)
FAT vs LOCO Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 503.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while LOCO trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check LOCO's competition here
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAST)
FAT vs TAST Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to TAST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TAST's competition here
Dine Brands Global, Inc. (NYSE: DIN)
FAT vs DIN Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 443.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while DIN trades at $34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DIN's competition here
Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NASDAQ: NATH)
FAT vs NATH Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while NATH trades at $98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check NATH's competition here
Jack in the Box Inc. (NASDAQ: JACK)
FAT vs JACK Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 329.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while JACK trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check JACK's competition here
Portillo's Inc. (NASDAQ: PTLO)
FAT vs PTLO Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 327.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while PTLO trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PTLO's competition here
Denny's Corporation (NASDAQ: DENN)
FAT vs DENN Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check DENN's competition here
Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FRGI)
FAT vs FRGI Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FRGI's competition here
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RICK)
FAT vs RICK Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while RICK trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 170.00. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RICK's competition here
BBQ Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBQ)
FAT vs BBQ Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BBQ's competition here
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (NASDAQ: RRGB)
FAT vs RRGB Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while RRGB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RRGB's competition here
Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRCB)
FAT vs BRCB Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BRCB has a market cap of 145M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BRCB trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRCB's P/E ratio is 805.00. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BRCB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BRCB's competition here
Banyan Acquisition Corporation (NYSE: BYN-WT)
FAT vs BYN-WT Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BYN-WT's competition here
Noodles & Company (NASDAQ: NDLS)
FAT vs NDLS Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while NDLS trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check NDLS's competition here
TH International Limited (NASDAQ: THCHW)
FAT vs THCHW Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check THCHW's competition here
Venu Holding Corporation (AMEX: VENU)
FAT vs VENU Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while VENU trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check VENU's competition here
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (AMEX: BDL)
FAT vs BDL Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BDL trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BDL's competition here
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: HCHL)
FAT vs HCHL Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while HCHL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check HCHL's competition here
MasterBeef Group (NASDAQ: MB)
FAT vs MB Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while MB trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MB's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check MB's competition here
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: GENK)
FAT vs GENK Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while GENK trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check GENK's competition here
TH International Limited (NASDAQ: THCH)
FAT vs THCH Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while THCH trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check THCH's competition here
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (NASDAQ: STKS)
FAT vs STKS Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while STKS trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check STKS's competition here
Muscle Maker, Inc. (NASDAQ: GRIL)
FAT vs GRIL Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check GRIL's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. Class A Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: FATAV)
FAT vs FATAV Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATAV's competition here
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RAVE)
FAT vs RAVE Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while RAVE trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check RAVE's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FATBW)
FAT vs FATBW Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FATBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBW's competition here
Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (NASDAQ: PC)
FAT vs PC Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to PC. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PC's competition here
CCH Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CCHH)
FAT vs CCHH Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, CCHH has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while CCHH trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCHH's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCHH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to CCHH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check CCHH's competition here
Bit Brother Limited (NASDAQ: MYT)
FAT vs MYT Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check MYT's competition here
Ark Restaurants Corp. (NASDAQ: ARKR)
FAT vs ARKR Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while ARKR trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check ARKR's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FATBB)
FAT vs FATBB Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FATBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBB's competition here
Good Times Restaurants Inc. (NASDAQ: GTIM)
FAT vs GTIM Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while GTIM trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check GTIM's competition here
Yoshiharu Global Co. (NASDAQ: YOSH)
FAT vs YOSH Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check YOSH's competition here
BT Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBD)
FAT vs BTBD Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BTBD trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BTBD's competition here
Reborn Coffee, Inc. (NASDAQ: REBN)
FAT vs REBN Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while REBN trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check REBN's competition here
BT Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBDW)
FAT vs BTBDW Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BTBDW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BTBDW's competition here
Bit Brother Limited (NASDAQ: BTB)
FAT vs BTB Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BTB's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. Class B Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: FATBV)
FAT vs FATBV Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBV's competition here
Twin Hospitality Group (NASDAQ: TWNP)
FAT vs TWNP Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check TWNP's competition here
BurgerFi International, Inc. (NASDAQ: BFI)
FAT vs BFI Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BFI's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FATBP)
FAT vs FATBP Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FATBP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check FATBP's competition here
Vestand Inc. (NASDAQ: VSTD)
FAT vs VSTD Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, VSTD has a market cap of 560.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while VSTD trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VSTD's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VSTD's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to VSTD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check VSTD's competition here
BurgerFi International, LLC (NASDAQ: BFIIW)
FAT vs BFIIW Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BFIIW's competition here
Sushi Ginza Onodera, Inc. (AMEX: ONDR)
FAT vs ONDR Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check ONDR's competition here
Jamba, Inc. (NASDAQ: JMBA)
FAT vs JMBA Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is -42.53. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check JMBA's competition here
Cosi Inc. (NASDAQ: COSI)
FAT vs COSI Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check COSI's competition here
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLKI)
FAT vs PLKI Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PLKI's competition here
Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (NASDAQ: BOBE)
FAT vs BOBE Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BOBE's competition here
Panera Bread Co. (NASDAQ: PNRA)
FAT vs PNRA Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check PNRA's competition here
Sonic Corp. (NASDAQ: SONC)
FAT vs SONC Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is 82.06. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to SONC. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check SONC's competition here
Bojangles', Inc. (NASDAQ: BOJA)
FAT vs BOJA Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is similarly volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BOJA's competition here
Zoe's Kitchen, Inc. (NYSE: ZOES)
FAT vs ZOES Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is -67.16. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check ZOES's competition here
Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BWLD)
FAT vs BWLD Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check BWLD's competition here
Luby's, Inc. (NYSE: LUB)
FAT vs LUB Comparison August 2026
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAT stands at 3M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAT is priced at $0.16 on the NASDAQ, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAT's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAT is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAT.Check LUB's competition here