Brinker International, Inc.
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | $138.67 | -3.60% | 6B | 13.98 | $9.91 | N/A |
| MCD | $299.36 | -1.05% | 212.8B | 25.03 | $11.96 | +2.42% |
| SBUX | $98.67 | -0.87% | 112.4B | 82.23 | $1.20 | +2.49% |
| CMG | $34.21 | +0.91% | 45.2B | 30.01 | $1.14 | N/A |
| YUM | $160.28 | -0.28% | 44.3B | 28.88 | $5.55 | +1.80% |
| QSR | $80.90 | -0.41% | 26.6B | 30.76 | $2.63 | +3.08% |
| DRI | $201.06 | -0.63% | 23.2B | 21.19 | $9.49 | +2.98% |
| YUMC | $48.81 | +1.60% | 17.1B | 19.45 | $2.51 | +2.06% |
| DPZ | $367.83 | -1.22% | 12.4B | 20.97 | $17.56 | +1.93% |
| CAVA | $95.68 | +2.76% | 11.1B | 177.13 | $0.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EAT vs MCD Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while MCD trades at $299.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MCD's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MCD's competition here
EAT vs SBUX Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 112.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while SBUX trades at $98.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 82.23. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SBUX's competition here
EAT vs CMG Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while CMG trades at $34.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CMG's competition here
EAT vs YUM Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while YUM trades at $160.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUM's competition here
EAT vs QSR Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while QSR trades at $80.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check QSR's competition here
EAT vs DRI Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while DRI trades at $201.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DRI's competition here
EAT vs YUMC Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while YUMC trades at $48.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUMC's competition here
EAT vs DPZ Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while DPZ trades at $367.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DPZ's competition here
EAT vs CAVA Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while CAVA trades at $95.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 177.13. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAVA's competition here
EAT vs TXRH Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while TXRH trades at $159.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TXRH's competition here
EAT vs BROS Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BROS trades at $57.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 89.75. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BROS's competition here
EAT vs WING Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while WING trades at $189.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WING's competition here
EAT vs SHAK Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while SHAK trades at $103.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 94.50. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SHAK's competition here
EAT vs CAKE Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while CAKE trades at $61.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAKE's competition here
EAT vs ARCO Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while ARCO trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARCO's competition here
EAT vs WEN Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while WEN trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WEN's competition here
EAT vs PZZA Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while PZZA trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 41.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PZZA's competition here
EAT vs BH-A Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BH-A trades at $1,683.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH-A's competition here
EAT vs BH Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 972.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BH trades at $309.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH's competition here
EAT vs TWNPV Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNPV's competition here
EAT vs SG Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 848.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while SG trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SG's competition here
EAT vs HDL Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 837.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while HDL trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HDL's competition here
EAT vs FWRG Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 811.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FWRG trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FWRG's competition here
EAT vs BJRI Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 809.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BJRI trades at $38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BJRI's competition here
EAT vs RUTH Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RUTH's competition here
EAT vs KRUS Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 687.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while KRUS trades at $56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -377.47. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check KRUS's competition here
EAT vs CNNE Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 685M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while CNNE trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CNNE's competition here
EAT vs CBRL Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 656.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while CBRL trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is -146.80. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CBRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CBRL's competition here
EAT vs CHUY Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHUY's competition here
EAT vs BLMN Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 522.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BLMN trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 61.30. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BLMN's competition here
EAT vs PBPB Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PBPB's competition here
EAT vs TAST Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TAST's competition here
EAT vs PTLO Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 462.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while PTLO trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PTLO's competition here
EAT vs LOCO Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 414.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while LOCO trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LOCO's competition here
EAT vs NATH Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 414.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while NATH trades at $101.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NATH's competition here
EAT vs DIN Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 369.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while DIN trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DIN's competition here
EAT vs DENN Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DENN's competition here
EAT vs JACK Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 246.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while JACK trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JACK's competition here
EAT vs RICK Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 226.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while RICK trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RICK's competition here
EAT vs FRGI Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FRGI's competition here
EAT vs BBQ Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BBQ's competition here
EAT vs VENU Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while VENU trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check VENU's competition here
EAT vs BYN-WT Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BYN-WT's competition here
EAT vs MB Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while MB trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -19.42. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MB's competition here
EAT vs THCHW Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCHW's competition here
EAT vs RRGB Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while RRGB trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RRGB's competition here
EAT vs NDLS Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while NDLS trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NDLS's competition here
EAT vs THCH Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while THCH trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCH's competition here
EAT vs BDL Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BDL trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BDL's competition here
EAT vs STKS Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while STKS trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check STKS's competition here
EAT vs GRIL Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GRIL's competition here
EAT vs FATAV Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATAV's competition here
EAT vs GENK Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while GENK trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GENK's competition here
EAT vs RAVE Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while RAVE trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RAVE's competition here
EAT vs FATBW Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBW's competition here
EAT vs PC Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PC's competition here
EAT vs HCHL Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while HCHL trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HCHL's competition here
EAT vs ARKR Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while ARKR trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARKR's competition here
EAT vs MYT Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MYT's competition here
EAT vs FATBB Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBB's competition here
EAT vs REBN Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while REBN trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to REBN's ROE of +137.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check REBN's competition here
EAT vs GTIM Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while GTIM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GTIM's competition here
EAT vs BTBD Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BTBD trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBD's competition here
EAT vs YOSH Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YOSH's competition here
EAT vs BTB Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTB's competition here
EAT vs FATBV Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBV's competition here
EAT vs TWNP Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNP's competition here
EAT vs FAT Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FAT's competition here
EAT vs BFI Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFI's competition here
EAT vs PNST Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while PNST trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNST's competition here
EAT vs FATBP Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBP's competition here
EAT vs BTBDW Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BTBDW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBDW's competition here
EAT vs BFIIW Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFIIW's competition here
EAT vs CHSN Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 197.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while CHSN trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to CHSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHSN's competition here
EAT vs ONDR Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ONDR's competition here
EAT vs PNRA Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNRA's competition here
EAT vs SONC Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SONC's competition here
EAT vs PLKI Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PLKI's competition here
EAT vs ZOES Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ZOES's competition here
EAT vs BOBE Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOBE's competition here
EAT vs BOJA Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOJA's competition here
EAT vs COSI Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check COSI's competition here
EAT vs JMBA Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JMBA's competition here
EAT vs BWLD Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BWLD's competition here
EAT vs LUB Comparison April 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $138.67, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.98, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.34%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LUB's competition here