Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See EAT's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for EAT and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | $213.70 | +1.83% | 9.2B | 20.98 | $10.19 | N/A |
| MCD | $270.64 | +0.82% | 192.3B | 21.90 | $12.36 | +2.72% |
| SBUX | $105.25 | -0.57% | 120B | 50.60 | $2.08 | +2.34% |
| CMG | $37.22 | -3.37% | 47.8B | 33.56 | $1.11 | N/A |
| YUM | $153.28 | -2.37% | 42.3B | 24.55 | $6.25 | +1.90% |
| QSR | $74.02 | -0.43% | 25.7B | 19.53 | $3.79 | +3.42% |
| DRI | $203.58 | -1.64% | 23.3B | 19.10 | $10.66 | +2.98% |
| YUMC | $48.18 | +3.68% | 16.8B | 18.47 | $2.61 | +2.19% |
| TXRH | $205.44 | -1.34% | 13.5B | 32.82 | $6.26 | +1.39% |
| DPZ | $347.44 | -1.37% | 11.5B | 20.00 | $17.37 | +2.13% |
Stock Comparison
McDonald's Corporation (NYSE: MCD)
EAT vs MCD Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 192.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while MCD trades at $270.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MCD's competition here
Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: SBUX)
EAT vs SBUX Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 120B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while SBUX trades at $105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 50.60. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SBUX's competition here
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE: CMG)
EAT vs CMG Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CMG trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CMG's competition here
Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM)
EAT vs YUM Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while YUM trades at $153.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUM's competition here
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE: QSR)
EAT vs QSR Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while QSR trades at $74.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check QSR's competition here
Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE: DRI)
EAT vs DRI Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while DRI trades at $203.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DRI's competition here
Yum China Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: YUMC)
EAT vs YUMC Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while YUMC trades at $48.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUMC's competition here
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (NASDAQ: TXRH)
EAT vs TXRH Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while TXRH trades at $205.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TXRH's competition here
Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ: DPZ)
EAT vs DPZ Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while DPZ trades at $347.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DPZ's competition here
Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE: BROS)
EAT vs BROS Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BROS trades at $65.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 84.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BROS's competition here
CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE: CAVA)
EAT vs CAVA Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CAVA trades at $65.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 125.56. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAVA's competition here
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (NASDAQ: CAKE)
EAT vs CAKE Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CAKE trades at $101.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAKE's competition here
Wingstop Inc. (NASDAQ: WING)
EAT vs WING Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while WING trades at $129.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WING's competition here
Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE: SHAK)
EAT vs SHAK Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while SHAK trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 53.74. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SHAK's competition here
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: CHA)
EAT vs CHA Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CHA trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHA's competition here
Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ARCO)
EAT vs ARCO Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while ARCO trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARCO's competition here
BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (NASDAQ: BJRI)
EAT vs BJRI Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BJRI trades at $67.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BJRI's competition here
The Wendy's Company (NASDAQ: WEN)
EAT vs WEN Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while WEN trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WEN's competition here
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (NASDAQ: CBRL)
EAT vs CBRL Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CBRL trades at $56.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 104.43. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CBRL's competition here
Biglari Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BH-A)
EAT vs BH-A Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BH-A trades at $1,984.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH-A's competition here
Biglari Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BH)
EAT vs BH Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BH trades at $397.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH's competition here
Papa John's International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PZZA)
EAT vs PZZA Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 983.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while PZZA trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PZZA's competition here
Twin Hospitality Group Inc. (NASDAQ: TWNPV)
EAT vs TWNPV Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNPV's competition here
First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FWRG)
EAT vs FWRG Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 792.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FWRG trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 45.89. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FWRG's competition here
SUPER HI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING Ltd. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: HDL)
EAT vs HDL Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 776.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while HDL trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HDL's competition here
Sweetgreen, Inc. (NYSE: SG)
EAT vs SG Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 765.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while SG trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SG's competition here
Cannae Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CNNE)
EAT vs CNNE Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 762.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CNNE trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CNNE's competition here
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: BLMN)
EAT vs BLMN Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 741.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BLMN trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BLMN's competition here
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RUTH)
EAT vs RUTH Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RUTH's competition here
Chuy's Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHUY)
EAT vs CHUY Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHUY's competition here
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (NASDAQ: KRUS)
EAT vs KRUS Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 559.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while KRUS trades at $46.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -1151.75. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check KRUS's competition here
Krispy Kreme, Inc. (NASDAQ: DNUT)
EAT vs DNUT Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 548.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while DNUT trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -31.80. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DNUT's competition here
Potbelly Corporation (NASDAQ: PBPB)
EAT vs PBPB Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PBPB's competition here
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAST)
EAT vs TAST Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TAST's competition here
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LOCO)
EAT vs LOCO Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 501.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while LOCO trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LOCO's competition here
Dine Brands Global, Inc. (NYSE: DIN)
EAT vs DIN Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while DIN trades at $35.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DIN's competition here
Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NASDAQ: NATH)
EAT vs NATH Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while NATH trades at $98.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NATH's competition here
Portillo's Inc. (NASDAQ: PTLO)
EAT vs PTLO Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while PTLO trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PTLO's competition here
Denny's Corporation (NASDAQ: DENN)
EAT vs DENN Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DENN's competition here
Jack in the Box Inc. (NASDAQ: JACK)
EAT vs JACK Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while JACK trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to JACK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JACK's competition here
Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FRGI)
EAT vs FRGI Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FRGI's competition here
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RICK)
EAT vs RICK Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while RICK trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 167.27. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RICK's competition here
BBQ Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBQ)
EAT vs BBQ Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BBQ's competition here
Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRCB)
EAT vs BRCB Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BRCB has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BRCB trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BRCB's P/E ratio is 806.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BRCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BRCB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BRCB's competition here
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (NASDAQ: RRGB)
EAT vs RRGB Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 145M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while RRGB trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RRGB's competition here
Banyan Acquisition Corporation (NYSE: BYN-WT)
EAT vs BYN-WT Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BYN-WT's competition here
Noodles & Company (NASDAQ: NDLS)
EAT vs NDLS Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while NDLS trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -17.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NDLS's competition here
TH International Limited (NASDAQ: THCHW)
EAT vs THCHW Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCHW's competition here
Venu Holding Corporation (AMEX: VENU)
EAT vs VENU Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while VENU trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check VENU's competition here
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (AMEX: BDL)
EAT vs BDL Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BDL trades at $41.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BDL's competition here
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: HCHL)
EAT vs HCHL Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while HCHL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HCHL's competition here
MasterBeef Group (NASDAQ: MB)
EAT vs MB Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while MB trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MB's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MB's competition here
GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: GENK)
EAT vs GENK Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while GENK trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GENK's competition here
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (NASDAQ: STKS)
EAT vs STKS Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while STKS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check STKS's competition here
Muscle Maker, Inc. (NASDAQ: GRIL)
EAT vs GRIL Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GRIL's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. Class A Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: FATAV)
EAT vs FATAV Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATAV's competition here
TH International Limited (NASDAQ: THCH)
EAT vs THCH Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while THCH trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCH's competition here
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RAVE)
EAT vs RAVE Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while RAVE trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RAVE's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FATBW)
EAT vs FATBW Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBW's competition here
Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (NASDAQ: PC)
EAT vs PC Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PC's competition here
CCH Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CCHH)
EAT vs CCHH Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CCHH has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while CCHH trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CCHH's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CCHH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CCHH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CCHH's competition here
Bit Brother Limited (NASDAQ: MYT)
EAT vs MYT Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MYT's competition here
Ark Restaurants Corp. (NASDAQ: ARKR)
EAT vs ARKR Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while ARKR trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARKR's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FATBB)
EAT vs FATBB Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBB's competition here
Good Times Restaurants Inc. (NASDAQ: GTIM)
EAT vs GTIM Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while GTIM trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GTIM's competition here
BT Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBDW)
EAT vs BTBDW Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BTBDW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBDW's competition here
Yoshiharu Global Co. (NASDAQ: YOSH)
EAT vs YOSH Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YOSH's competition here
BT Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBD)
EAT vs BTBD Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BTBD trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBD's competition here
Reborn Coffee, Inc. (NASDAQ: REBN)
EAT vs REBN Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while REBN trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check REBN's competition here
Bit Brother Limited (NASDAQ: BTB)
EAT vs BTB Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTB's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. Class B Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: FATBV)
EAT vs FATBV Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBV's competition here
Twin Hospitality Group (NASDAQ: TWNP)
EAT vs TWNP Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNP's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FAT)
EAT vs FAT Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FAT's competition here
BurgerFi International, Inc. (NASDAQ: BFI)
EAT vs BFI Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFI's competition here
FAT Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: FATBP)
EAT vs FATBP Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBP's competition here
Vestand Inc. (NASDAQ: VSTD)
EAT vs VSTD Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VSTD has a market cap of 560.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while VSTD trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas VSTD's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VSTD's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to VSTD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check VSTD's competition here
BurgerFi International, LLC (NASDAQ: BFIIW)
EAT vs BFIIW Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFIIW's competition here
Sushi Ginza Onodera, Inc. (AMEX: ONDR)
EAT vs ONDR Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ONDR's competition here
Cosi Inc. (NASDAQ: COSI)
EAT vs COSI Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check COSI's competition here
Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BWLD)
EAT vs BWLD Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BWLD's competition here
Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (NASDAQ: BOBE)
EAT vs BOBE Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOBE's competition here
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLKI)
EAT vs PLKI Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PLKI's competition here
Zoe's Kitchen, Inc. (NYSE: ZOES)
EAT vs ZOES Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is -67.16. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ZOES's competition here
Panera Bread Co. (NASDAQ: PNRA)
EAT vs PNRA Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNRA's competition here
Sonic Corp. (NASDAQ: SONC)
EAT vs SONC Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is 82.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SONC's competition here
Bojangles', Inc. (NASDAQ: BOJA)
EAT vs BOJA Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOJA's competition here
Luby's, Inc. (NYSE: LUB)
EAT vs LUB Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LUB's competition here
Jamba, Inc. (NASDAQ: JMBA)
EAT vs JMBA Comparison August 2026
Brinker International, Inc. (NYSE: EAT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 9.2B. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $213.70 on the NYSE, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is -42.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JMBA's competition here