Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. (FRGI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRGI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRGI | $8.50 | +0.06% | 222.5M | -33.98 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| MCD | $272.61 | -0.72% | 193.7B | 22.05 | $12.36 | +2.70% |
| SBUX | $107.34 | +1.25% | 122.3B | 51.61 | $2.08 | +2.29% |
| CMG | $36.63 | +3.91% | 47B | 33.02 | $1.11 | N/A |
| YUM | $161.68 | -1.14% | 44.6B | 25.87 | $6.25 | +1.81% |
| QSR | $75.57 | +0.41% | 26.2B | 19.94 | $3.79 | +3.35% |
| DRI | $196.69 | -3.70% | 22.5B | 18.46 | $10.66 | +3.11% |
| YUMC | $43.90 | +2.05% | 15.3B | 16.82 | $2.61 | +2.41% |
| TXRH | $192.03 | +1.34% | 12.6B | 30.68 | $6.26 | +1.50% |
| BROS | $66.46 | -1.63% | 11.5B | 85.23 | $0.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRGI vs MCD Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 193.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while MCD trades at $272.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check MCD's competition here
FRGI vs SBUX Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while SBUX trades at $107.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 51.61. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check SBUX's competition here
FRGI vs CMG Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CMG trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check CMG's competition here
FRGI vs YUM Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while YUM trades at $161.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check YUM's competition here
FRGI vs QSR Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while QSR trades at $75.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check QSR's competition here
FRGI vs DRI Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DRI trades at $196.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check DRI's competition here
FRGI vs YUMC Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while YUMC trades at $43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check YUMC's competition here
FRGI vs TXRH Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TXRH trades at $192.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check TXRH's competition here
FRGI vs BROS Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BROS trades at $66.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 85.23. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BROS's competition here
FRGI vs DPZ Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DPZ trades at $309.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check DPZ's competition here
FRGI vs CAVA Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CAVA trades at $72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 139.59. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check CAVA's competition here
FRGI vs EAT Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while EAT trades at $189.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check EAT's competition here
FRGI vs WING Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while WING trades at $154.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check WING's competition here
FRGI vs CAKE Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CAKE trades at $81.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check CAKE's competition here
FRGI vs SHAK Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while SHAK trades at $62.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 53.22. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check SHAK's competition here
FRGI vs ARCO Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while ARCO trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check ARCO's competition here
FRGI vs WEN Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while WEN trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check WEN's competition here
FRGI vs BJRI Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BJRI trades at $62.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BJRI's competition here
FRGI vs BH Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BH trades at $390.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BH's competition here
FRGI vs BH-A Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BH-A trades at $2,002.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BH-A's competition here
FRGI vs CBRL Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CBRL trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 96.94. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check CBRL's competition here
FRGI vs PZZA Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PZZA trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check PZZA's competition here
FRGI vs SG Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 983.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while SG trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check SG's competition here
FRGI vs TWNPV Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check TWNPV's competition here
FRGI vs CNNE Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 780M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CNNE trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check CNNE's competition here
FRGI vs FWRG Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 752.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FWRG trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check FWRG's competition here
FRGI vs HDL Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 738.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while HDL trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check HDL's competition here
FRGI vs BLMN Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BLMN trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BLMN's competition here
FRGI vs RUTH Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check RUTH's competition here
FRGI vs CHUY Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check CHUY's competition here
FRGI vs KRUS Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while KRUS trades at $51.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -1278.75. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check KRUS's competition here
FRGI vs PBPB Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check PBPB's competition here
FRGI vs LOCO Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while LOCO trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check LOCO's competition here
FRGI vs TAST Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check TAST's competition here
FRGI vs DIN Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 456.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DIN trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check DIN's competition here
FRGI vs NATH Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 411.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while NATH trades at $100.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check NATH's competition here
FRGI vs PTLO Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PTLO trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check PTLO's competition here
FRGI vs DENN Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check DENN's competition here
FRGI vs JACK Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while JACK trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check JACK's competition here
FRGI vs RICK Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RICK trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 176.67. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check RICK's competition here
FRGI vs BBQ Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BBQ's competition here
FRGI vs BRCB Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BRCB has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BRCB trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BRCB's P/E ratio is 825.00. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BRCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BRCB's competition here
FRGI vs RRGB Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RRGB trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check RRGB's competition here
FRGI vs BYN-WT Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BYN-WT's competition here
FRGI vs VENU Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while VENU trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check VENU's competition here
FRGI vs THCHW Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check THCHW's competition here
FRGI vs HCHL Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while HCHL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check HCHL's competition here
FRGI vs BDL Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BDL trades at $40.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BDL's competition here
FRGI vs NDLS Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while NDLS trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check NDLS's competition here
FRGI vs MB Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while MB trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MB's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check MB's competition here
FRGI vs STKS Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while STKS trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check STKS's competition here
FRGI vs GENK Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while GENK trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check GENK's competition here
FRGI vs THCH Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while THCH trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check THCH's competition here
FRGI vs GRIL Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check GRIL's competition here
FRGI vs FATAV Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check FATAV's competition here
FRGI vs RAVE Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while RAVE trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check RAVE's competition here
FRGI vs FATBW Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check FATBW's competition here
FRGI vs PC Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check PC's competition here
FRGI vs MYT Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check MYT's competition here
FRGI vs ARKR Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while ARKR trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check ARKR's competition here
FRGI vs FATBB Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check FATBB's competition here
FRGI vs GTIM Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while GTIM trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check GTIM's competition here
FRGI vs YOSH Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check YOSH's competition here
FRGI vs REBN Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while REBN trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check REBN's competition here
FRGI vs BTBD Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BTBD trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BTBD's competition here
FRGI vs BTB Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BTB's competition here
FRGI vs FATBV Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check FATBV's competition here
FRGI vs BTBDW Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BTBDW's competition here
FRGI vs TWNP Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check TWNP's competition here
FRGI vs FAT Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check FAT's competition here
FRGI vs BFI Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BFI's competition here
FRGI vs FATBP Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FATBP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check FATBP's competition here
FRGI vs BFIIW Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BFIIW's competition here
FRGI vs ONDR Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check ONDR's competition here
FRGI vs COSI Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check COSI's competition here
FRGI vs PNRA Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check PNRA's competition here
FRGI vs LUB Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check LUB's competition here
FRGI vs ZOES Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is less volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check ZOES's competition here
FRGI vs BOBE Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BOBE's competition here
FRGI vs JMBA Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is -131.20. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check JMBA's competition here
FRGI vs BWLD Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BWLD's competition here
FRGI vs BOJA Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check BOJA's competition here
FRGI vs SONC Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check SONC's competition here
FRGI vs PLKI Comparison July 2026
FRGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGI stands at 222.5M. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRGI is priced at $8.50, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGI currently has a P/E ratio of -33.98, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, FRGI's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGI is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGI.Check PLKI's competition here