Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CMG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMG | $31.14 | -4.17% | 39.2B | 28.03 | $1.09 | N/A |
| MCD | $271.27 | -2.64% | 192B | 22.29 | $12.12 | +2.68% |
| SBUX | $100.94 | +0.29% | 114.1B | 76.45 | $1.31 | +2.45% |
| YUM | $152.63 | +0.42% | 41.6B | 24.32 | $6.20 | +1.93% |
| QSR | $71.23 | -3.01% | 24.9B | 23.11 | $3.11 | +3.48% |
| DRI | $212.87 | -0.27% | 24.3B | 22.31 | $9.50 | +2.76% |
| YUMC | $41.05 | -4.38% | 14.5B | 15.91 | $2.61 | +2.51% |
| TXRH | $181.60 | +2.17% | 11.8B | 28.67 | $6.27 | +1.55% |
| BROS | $68.41 | -3.27% | 11.6B | 104.80 | $0.64 | N/A |
| DPZ | $285.59 | -8.60% | 9.8B | 16.99 | $17.37 | +2.50% |
Stock Comparison
CMG vs MCD Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while MCD trades at $271.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check MCD's competition here
CMG vs SBUX Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while SBUX trades at $100.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 76.45. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check SBUX's competition here
CMG vs YUM Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while YUM trades at $152.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check YUM's competition here
CMG vs QSR Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while QSR trades at $71.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check QSR's competition here
CMG vs DRI Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while DRI trades at $212.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check DRI's competition here
CMG vs YUMC Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while YUMC trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check YUMC's competition here
CMG vs TXRH Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while TXRH trades at $181.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check TXRH's competition here
CMG vs BROS Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BROS trades at $68.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 104.80. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BROS's competition here
CMG vs DPZ Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while DPZ trades at $285.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check DPZ's competition here
CMG vs CAVA Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while CAVA trades at $79.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 155.54. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check CAVA's competition here
CMG vs EAT Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while EAT trades at $164.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check EAT's competition here
CMG vs WING Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while WING trades at $152.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check WING's competition here
CMG vs CAKE Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while CAKE trades at $77.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check CAKE's competition here
CMG vs SHAK Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while SHAK trades at $53.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 56.84. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check SHAK's competition here
CMG vs ARCO Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while ARCO trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check ARCO's competition here
CMG vs WEN Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while WEN trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check WEN's competition here
CMG vs BJRI Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BJRI trades at $54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BJRI's competition here
CMG vs PZZA Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while PZZA trades at $35.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 41.39. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check PZZA's competition here
CMG vs BH Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BH trades at $344.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BH's competition here
CMG vs BH-A Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BH-A trades at $1,752.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BH-A's competition here
CMG vs CBRL Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while CBRL trades at $47.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check CBRL's competition here
CMG vs SG Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 988.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while SG trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SG's P/E ratio is 69.29. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check SG's competition here
CMG vs TWNPV Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check TWNPV's competition here
CMG vs HDL Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 756.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while HDL trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check HDL's competition here
CMG vs BLMN Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 713.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BLMN trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BLMN's competition here
CMG vs FWRG Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 712.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FWRG trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FWRG's competition here
CMG vs CNNE Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 699.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while CNNE trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check CNNE's competition here
CMG vs RUTH Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check RUTH's competition here
CMG vs CHUY Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check CHUY's competition here
CMG vs KRUS Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 599.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while KRUS trades at $47.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -329.20. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check KRUS's competition here
CMG vs PBPB Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check PBPB's competition here
CMG vs TAST Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check TAST's competition here
CMG vs LOCO Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 470.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while LOCO trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check LOCO's competition here
CMG vs DIN Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 423.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while DIN trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check DIN's competition here
CMG vs NATH Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while NATH trades at $100.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check NATH's competition here
CMG vs DENN Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check DENN's competition here
CMG vs PTLO Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while PTLO trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check PTLO's competition here
CMG vs JACK Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while JACK trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check JACK's competition here
CMG vs FRGI Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FRGI's competition here
CMG vs RICK Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while RICK trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is -34.71. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check RICK's competition here
CMG vs BBQ Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BBQ's competition here
CMG vs VENU Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while VENU trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check VENU's competition here
CMG vs BYN-WT Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BYN-WT's competition here
CMG vs RRGB Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while RRGB trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check RRGB's competition here
CMG vs THCHW Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check THCHW's competition here
CMG vs MB Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while MB trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check MB's competition here
CMG vs BDL Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BDL trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BDL's competition here
CMG vs NDLS Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while NDLS trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check NDLS's competition here
CMG vs HCHL Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while HCHL trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check HCHL's competition here
CMG vs GENK Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while GENK trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check GENK's competition here
CMG vs STKS Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while STKS trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check STKS's competition here
CMG vs GRIL Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check GRIL's competition here
CMG vs FATAV Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FATAV's competition here
CMG vs THCH Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while THCH trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check THCH's competition here
CMG vs RAVE Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while RAVE trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check RAVE's competition here
CMG vs FATBW Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FATBW's competition here
CMG vs PC Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check PC's competition here
CMG vs ARKR Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while ARKR trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check ARKR's competition here
CMG vs MYT Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check MYT's competition here
CMG vs FATBB Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FATBB's competition here
CMG vs GTIM Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while GTIM trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check GTIM's competition here
CMG vs YOSH Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check YOSH's competition here
CMG vs REBN Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while REBN trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check REBN's competition here
CMG vs BTBDW Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BTBDW's competition here
CMG vs BTBD Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BTBD trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BTBD's competition here
CMG vs BTB Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BTB's competition here
CMG vs FATBV Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FATBV's competition here
CMG vs TWNP Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check TWNP's competition here
CMG vs FAT Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FAT's competition here
CMG vs BFI Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BFI's competition here
CMG vs FATBP Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FATBP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check FATBP's competition here
CMG vs BFIIW Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BFIIW's competition here
CMG vs CHSN Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 11.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while CHSN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check CHSN's competition here
CMG vs ONDR Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check ONDR's competition here
CMG vs LUB Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check LUB's competition here
CMG vs COSI Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check COSI's competition here
CMG vs SONC Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check SONC's competition here
CMG vs BWLD Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BWLD's competition here
CMG vs ZOES Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check ZOES's competition here
CMG vs BOBE Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BOBE's competition here
CMG vs PNRA Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check PNRA's competition here
CMG vs BOJA Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check BOJA's competition here
CMG vs JMBA Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check JMBA's competition here
CMG vs PLKI Comparison June 2026
CMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMG stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMG is priced at $31.14, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMG currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMG's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CMG is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMG.Check PLKI's competition here