Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while MMC trades at $182.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MMC's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while MRSH trades at $169.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MRSH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while AON trades at $328.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check AON's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while AJG trades at $226.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check AJG's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while WLTW trades at $231.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check WLTW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while BRO trades at $64.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BRO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while CRVL trades at $62.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRVL's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while BRP trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BRP's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while BWIN trades at $26.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BWIN's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while FANH trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check FANH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 588.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while CRD-A trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRD-A's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 550.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while CRD-B trades at $10.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRD-B's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while WDH trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check WDH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while TWFG trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check TWFG's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while SLQT trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -42.70. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check SLQT's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while EHTH trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EHTH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while ZBAO trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check ZBAO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while GOCO trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check GOCO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while EZRA trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EZRA's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while RELI trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check RELI's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 534.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while HUIZ trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check HUIZ's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EZRAW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while RELIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check RELIW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 15.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while TIRX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check TIRX's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while EFM trades at $25.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EFM's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check GIWWW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 25.1B. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $265.43, while MER trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MER's competition here