Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while MMC trades at $182.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MMC's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while MRSH trades at $171.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MRSH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while AON trades at $323.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check AON's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while AJG trades at $215.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check AJG's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while WLTW trades at $231.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check WLTW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while BRO trades at $66.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BRO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while ERIE trades at $230.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check ERIE's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while CRVL trades at $58.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRVL's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while ARX trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check ARX's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while BRP trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BRP's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while FANH trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check FANH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while BWIN trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -50.26. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BWIN's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 532.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while CRD-A trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRD-A's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 491.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while CRD-B trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRD-B's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while TWFG trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check TWFG's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while SLQT trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check SLQT's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while EHTH trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EHTH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while GOCO trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check GOCO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while ZBAO trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check ZBAO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while EZRA trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EZRA's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while RELI trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check RELI's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 842.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while HUIZ trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check HUIZ's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EZRAW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while RELIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check RELIW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while TIRX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check TIRX's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check GIWWW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while MER trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MER's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.2B. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $292.99, while EFM trades at $25.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.70, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EFM's competition here