Crawford & Company (CRD-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRD-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRD-A | $11.95 | +8.14% | 588.2M | 14.74 | $0.81 | +2.64% |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.97% |
| MRSH | $169.03 | +4.19% | 81.3B | 16.92 | $9.98 | +2.15% |
| AON | $328.69 | +4.03% | 70.1B | 19.28 | $17.02 | +0.94% |
| AJG | $226.01 | +3.74% | 58B | 19.63 | $11.50 | +1.20% |
| WTW | $265.43 | +3.00% | 25.1B | 14.94 | $17.77 | +1.41% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| BRO | $64.22 | +5.57% | 21.8B | 14.60 | $4.40 | +1.01% |
| CRVL | $62.99 | +1.96% | 3.2B | 29.43 | $2.14 | N/A |
| BRP | $32.66 | +0.46% | 2.2B | -35.12 | -$0.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRD-A vs MMC Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MMC's competition here
CRD-A vs MRSH Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while MRSH trades at $169.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MRSH's competition here
CRD-A vs AON Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while AON trades at $328.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check AON's competition here
CRD-A vs AJG Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while AJG trades at $226.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check AJG's competition here
CRD-A vs WTW Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while WTW trades at $265.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check WTW's competition here
CRD-A vs WLTW Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check WLTW's competition here
CRD-A vs BRO Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while BRO trades at $64.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BRO's competition here
CRD-A vs CRVL Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while CRVL trades at $62.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check CRVL's competition here
CRD-A vs BRP Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BRP's competition here
CRD-A vs BWIN Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while BWIN trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BWIN's competition here
CRD-A vs FANH Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check FANH's competition here
CRD-A vs CRD-B Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 550.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while CRD-B trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check CRD-B's competition here
CRD-A vs WDH Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while WDH trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check WDH's competition here
CRD-A vs TWFG Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while TWFG trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check TWFG's competition here
CRD-A vs SLQT Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while SLQT trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -42.70. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check SLQT's competition here
CRD-A vs EHTH Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while EHTH trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EHTH's competition here
CRD-A vs ZBAO Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while ZBAO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check ZBAO's competition here
CRD-A vs GOCO Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while GOCO trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check GOCO's competition here
CRD-A vs EZRA Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while EZRA trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EZRA's competition here
CRD-A vs RELI Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check RELI's competition here
CRD-A vs HUIZ Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 534.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while HUIZ trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check HUIZ's competition here
CRD-A vs EZRAW Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EZRAW's competition here
CRD-A vs RELIW Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check RELIW's competition here
CRD-A vs TIRX Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 15.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while TIRX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check TIRX's competition here
CRD-A vs EFM Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while EFM trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EFM's competition here
CRD-A vs GIWWW Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check GIWWW's competition here
CRD-A vs MER Comparison June 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 588.2M. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $11.95, while MER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 14.74, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MER's competition here