Crawford & Company
Crawford & Company (CRD-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRD-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRD-A | $9.96 | -0.20% | 491.8M | 27.75 | $0.36 | +2.96% |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.97% |
| MRSH | $161.05 | +0.64% | 77.6B | 20.14 | $8.00 | +2.22% |
| AON | $317.22 | +0.57% | 67.7B | 17.39 | $18.23 | +0.96% |
| AJG | $199.95 | +1.15% | 51.4B | 32.35 | $6.18 | +1.34% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| WTW | $248.38 | +0.30% | 23.5B | 14.59 | $17.02 | +1.49% |
| BRO | $56.28 | +0.90% | 19.1B | 18.33 | $3.07 | +1.15% |
| ERIE | $213.05 | -0.12% | 9.8B | 19.51 | $10.92 | +2.66% |
| ARX | $15.44 | +5.68% | 3.4B | -2.38 | -$6.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRD-A vs MMC Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MMC's competition here
CRD-A vs MRSH Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while MRSH trades at $161.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MRSH's competition here
CRD-A vs AON Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while AON trades at $317.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check AON's competition here
CRD-A vs AJG Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while AJG trades at $199.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check AJG's competition here
CRD-A vs WLTW Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check WLTW's competition here
CRD-A vs WTW Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while WTW trades at $248.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check WTW's competition here
CRD-A vs BRO Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while BRO trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BRO's competition here
CRD-A vs ERIE Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while ERIE trades at $213.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check ERIE's competition here
CRD-A vs ARX Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while ARX trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check ARX's competition here
CRD-A vs CRVL Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while CRVL trades at $57.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check CRVL's competition here
CRD-A vs BRP Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BRP's competition here
CRD-A vs FANH Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check FANH's competition here
CRD-A vs BWIN Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while BWIN trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -29.01. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BWIN's competition here
CRD-A vs CRD-B Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 469.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while CRD-B trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check CRD-B's competition here
CRD-A vs TWFG Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while TWFG trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check TWFG's competition here
CRD-A vs SLQT Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 202.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while SLQT trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check SLQT's competition here
CRD-A vs EHTH Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while EHTH trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EHTH's competition here
CRD-A vs GOCO Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while GOCO trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check GOCO's competition here
CRD-A vs ZBAO Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while ZBAO trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check ZBAO's competition here
CRD-A vs EZRA Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while EZRA trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EZRA's competition here
CRD-A vs RELI Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check RELI's competition here
CRD-A vs HUIZ Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 903.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while HUIZ trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check HUIZ's competition here
CRD-A vs EZRAW Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EZRAW's competition here
CRD-A vs RELIW Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check RELIW's competition here
CRD-A vs TIRX Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while TIRX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check TIRX's competition here
CRD-A vs GIWWW Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check GIWWW's competition here
CRD-A vs MER Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while MER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MER's competition here
CRD-A vs EFM Comparison May 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 491.8M. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.96, while EFM trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 27.75, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EFM's competition here