Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WLTW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLTW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.97% |
| MRSH | $171.94 | -1.19% | 81.9B | 21.26 | $8.00 | +2.11% |
| AON | $323.73 | +0.05% | 69B | 18.86 | $17.03 | +0.93% |
| AJG | $215.44 | -1.79% | 55.4B | 37.51 | $5.74 | +1.23% |
| WTW | $292.99 | +0.72% | 27.2B | 17.70 | $16.25 | +1.29% |
| BRO | $66.83 | -1.07% | 22.4B | 20.85 | $3.16 | +0.95% |
| ERIE | $230.16 | -7.53% | 10.8B | 21.37 | $10.93 | +2.39% |
| CRVL | $58.25 | +2.62% | 2.9B | 28.10 | $2.04 | N/A |
| ARX | $13.51 | -6.67% | 2.9B | -1.75 | -$7.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLTW vs MMC Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check MMC's competition here
WLTW vs MRSH Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while MRSH trades at $171.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check MRSH's competition here
WLTW vs AON Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while AON trades at $323.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check AON's competition here
WLTW vs AJG Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while AJG trades at $215.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check AJG's competition here
WLTW vs WTW Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while WTW trades at $292.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check WTW's competition here
WLTW vs BRO Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while BRO trades at $66.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check BRO's competition here
WLTW vs ERIE Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while ERIE trades at $230.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check ERIE's competition here
WLTW vs CRVL Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while CRVL trades at $58.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check CRVL's competition here
WLTW vs ARX Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while ARX trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check ARX's competition here
WLTW vs BRP Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check BRP's competition here
WLTW vs FANH Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check FANH's competition here
WLTW vs BWIN Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while BWIN trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -50.26. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check BWIN's competition here
WLTW vs CRD-A Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 532.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while CRD-A trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check CRD-A's competition here
WLTW vs CRD-B Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 491.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while CRD-B trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check CRD-B's competition here
WLTW vs TWFG Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while TWFG trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check TWFG's competition here
WLTW vs SLQT Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while SLQT trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check SLQT's competition here
WLTW vs EHTH Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while EHTH trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check EHTH's competition here
WLTW vs GOCO Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while GOCO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check GOCO's competition here
WLTW vs ZBAO Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while ZBAO trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check ZBAO's competition here
WLTW vs EZRA Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while EZRA trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check EZRA's competition here
WLTW vs RELI Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check RELI's competition here
WLTW vs HUIZ Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 842.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while HUIZ trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check HUIZ's competition here
WLTW vs EZRAW Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check EZRAW's competition here
WLTW vs RELIW Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check RELIW's competition here
WLTW vs TIRX Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while TIRX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check TIRX's competition here
WLTW vs EFM Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while EFM trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check EFM's competition here
WLTW vs MER Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while MER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check MER's competition here
WLTW vs GIWWW Comparison April 2026
WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.7B. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.Check GIWWW's competition here