Zhibao Technology Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (ZBAO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZBAO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBAO | $0.52 | +1.38% | 17.8M | -1.38 | -$0.40 | N/A |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.97% |
| MRSH | $169.03 | +4.19% | 81.3B | 16.92 | $9.98 | +2.15% |
| AON | $328.69 | +4.03% | 70.1B | 19.28 | $17.02 | +0.94% |
| AJG | $226.01 | +3.74% | 58B | 19.63 | $11.50 | +1.20% |
| WTW | $265.43 | +3.00% | 25.1B | 14.94 | $17.77 | +1.41% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| BRO | $64.22 | +5.57% | 21.8B | 14.60 | $4.40 | +1.01% |
| CRVL | $62.99 | +1.96% | 3.2B | 29.43 | $2.14 | N/A |
| BRP | $32.66 | +0.46% | 2.2B | -35.12 | -$0.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZBAO vs MMC Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check MMC's competition here
ZBAO vs MRSH Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while MRSH trades at $169.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check MRSH's competition here
ZBAO vs AON Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while AON trades at $328.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check AON's competition here
ZBAO vs AJG Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while AJG trades at $226.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check AJG's competition here
ZBAO vs WTW Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while WTW trades at $265.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check WTW's competition here
ZBAO vs WLTW Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check WLTW's competition here
ZBAO vs BRO Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while BRO trades at $64.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check BRO's competition here
ZBAO vs CRVL Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while CRVL trades at $62.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check CRVL's competition here
ZBAO vs BRP Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check BRP's competition here
ZBAO vs BWIN Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while BWIN trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check BWIN's competition here
ZBAO vs FANH Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check FANH's competition here
ZBAO vs CRD-A Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 588.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while CRD-A trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check CRD-A's competition here
ZBAO vs CRD-B Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 550.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while CRD-B trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check CRD-B's competition here
ZBAO vs WDH Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while WDH trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check WDH's competition here
ZBAO vs TWFG Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while TWFG trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check TWFG's competition here
ZBAO vs SLQT Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while SLQT trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -42.70. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check SLQT's competition here
ZBAO vs EHTH Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while EHTH trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check EHTH's competition here
ZBAO vs GOCO Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while GOCO trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check GOCO's competition here
ZBAO vs EZRA Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while EZRA trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check EZRA's competition here
ZBAO vs RELI Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check RELI's competition here
ZBAO vs HUIZ Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 534.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while HUIZ trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check HUIZ's competition here
ZBAO vs EZRAW Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check EZRAW's competition here
ZBAO vs RELIW Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check RELIW's competition here
ZBAO vs TIRX Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 15.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while TIRX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check TIRX's competition here
ZBAO vs EFM Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while EFM trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check EFM's competition here
ZBAO vs GIWWW Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check GIWWW's competition here
ZBAO vs MER Comparison June 2026
ZBAO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZBAO stands at 17.8M. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZBAO is priced at $0.52, while MER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZBAO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.38, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZBAO's ROE is -4.71%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZBAO is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZBAO.Check MER's competition here