Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FANH's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FANH and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANH | $1.53 | -0.65% | 1.7B | 3.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.97% |
| MRSH | $175.99 | -3.08% | 84.8B | 17.64 | $9.98 | +2.04% |
| AON | $352.33 | -1.97% | 75.3B | 19.72 | $17.87 | +0.86% |
| AJG | $242.50 | -2.30% | 62.3B | 21.10 | $11.50 | +1.11% |
| WTW | $286.51 | -0.80% | 27.1B | 16.12 | $17.77 | +1.32% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| BRO | $65.39 | -1.88% | 22.2B | 14.86 | $4.40 | +0.99% |
| CRVL | $59.00 | -1.91% | 3B | 27.57 | $2.14 | N/A |
| NP | $30.00 | -5.03% | 2.9B | 74.00 | $0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE: MMC)
FANH vs MMC Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check MMC's competition here
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE: MRSH)
FANH vs MRSH Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while MRSH trades at $175.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check MRSH's competition here
Aon plc (NYSE: AON)
FANH vs AON Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while AON trades at $352.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check AON's competition here
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE: AJG)
FANH vs AJG Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while AJG trades at $242.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check AJG's competition here
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (NASDAQ: WTW)
FANH vs WTW Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while WTW trades at $286.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check WTW's competition here
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (NASDAQ: WLTW)
FANH vs WLTW Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check WLTW's competition here
Brown & Brown, Inc. (NYSE: BRO)
FANH vs BRO Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while BRO trades at $65.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check BRO's competition here
CorVel Corporation (NASDAQ: CRVL)
FANH vs CRVL Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while CRVL trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check CRVL's competition here
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NP)
FANH vs NP Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while NP trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas NP's P/E ratio is 74.00. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check NP's competition here
BRP Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRP)
FANH vs BRP Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check BRP's competition here
The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BWIN)
FANH vs BWIN Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while BWIN trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check BWIN's competition here
Crawford & Company (NYSE: CRD-B)
FANH vs CRD-B Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 542.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while CRD-B trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check CRD-B's competition here
Crawford & Company (NYSE: CRD-A)
FANH vs CRD-A Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 525.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while CRD-A trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check CRD-A's competition here
Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE: WDH)
FANH vs WDH Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 430.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while WDH trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to WDH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check WDH's competition here
TWFG, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: TWFG)
FANH vs TWFG Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while TWFG trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check TWFG's competition here
AIFU Inc. (NASDAQ: AIFU)
FANH vs AIFU Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 210.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while AIFU trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIFU's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check AIFU's competition here
SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE: SLQT)
FANH vs SLQT Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while SLQT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -36.02. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check SLQT's competition here
eHealth, Inc. (NASDAQ: EHTH)
FANH vs EHTH Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while EHTH trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EHTH's competition here
GoHealth Inc. (NASDAQ: GOCO)
FANH vs GOCO Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while GOCO trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check GOCO's competition here
Zhibao Technology Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: ZBAO)
FANH vs ZBAO Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while ZBAO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check ZBAO's competition here
Reliance Global Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EZRA)
FANH vs EZRA Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while EZRA trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EZRA's competition here
Reliance Global Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RELI)
FANH vs RELI Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check RELI's competition here
Huize Holding Limited (NASDAQ: HUIZ)
FANH vs HUIZ Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 635.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while HUIZ trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check HUIZ's competition here
Reliance Global Group, Inc. Warrant 2021-09.02.26 on Reliance Global Group (NASDAQ: EZRAW)
FANH vs EZRAW Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EZRAW's competition here
Reliance Global Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RELIW)
FANH vs RELIW Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check RELIW's competition here
Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: TIRX)
FANH vs TIRX Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 15.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while TIRX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check TIRX's competition here
GigInternational1, Inc. Warrant (NASDAQ: GIWWW)
FANH vs GIWWW Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check GIWWW's competition here
Merrill Lynch MITTS ML EuroFund Index due 2/28/2006 (NYSE: EFM)
FANH vs EFM Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while EFM trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EFM's competition here
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (NYSE: MER)
FANH vs MER Comparison July 2026
Fanhua Inc. (NASDAQ: FANH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53 on the NASDAQ, while MER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check MER's competition here