AIFU Inc.
AIFU Inc. (AIFU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AIFU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU | $1.38 | -1.43% | 161.9M | 0.12 | $11.85 | N/A |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $51.54 | +1.80% | 14B | 23.33 | $2.21 | +3.89% |
| AIZ | $230.46 | +0.61% | 11.5B | 13.62 | $16.92 | +1.45% |
| FAF | $68.84 | +3.55% | 7B | 11.47 | $6.00 | +3.18% |
| MTG | $28.77 | +2.12% | 6.2B | 9.16 | $3.14 | +2.02% |
| ACT | $43.91 | +1.29% | 6.2B | 9.71 | $4.52 | +1.91% |
| ESNT | $64.55 | +2.22% | 6.1B | 9.36 | $6.90 | +1.98% |
| RDN | $35.97 | +1.10% | 4.9B | 8.20 | $4.39 | +2.83% |
| RYAN | $35.40 | -2.45% | 4.6B | 75.32 | $0.47 | +1.38% |
Stock Comparison
AIFU vs HIPO-WT Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
AIFU vs FNF Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while FNF trades at $51.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FNF's competition here
AIFU vs AIZ Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while AIZ trades at $230.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AIZ's competition here
AIFU vs FAF Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while FAF trades at $68.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FAF's competition here
AIFU vs MTG Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while MTG trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MTG's competition here
AIFU vs ACT Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while ACT trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ACT's competition here
AIFU vs ESNT Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while ESNT trades at $64.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ESNT's competition here
AIFU vs RDN Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while RDN trades at $35.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RDN's competition here
AIFU vs RYAN Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while RYAN trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 75.32. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RYAN's competition here
AIFU vs AGO Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while AGO trades at $83.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AGO's competition here
AIFU vs NMIH Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while NMIH trades at $41.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check NMIH's competition here
AIFU vs TRUP Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while TRUP trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 59.64. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TRUP's competition here
AIFU vs EIG Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 987.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while EIG trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 91.76. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check EIG's competition here
AIFU vs HIPO Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 739.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while HIPO trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check HIPO's competition here
AIFU vs TIPT Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 654.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while TIPT trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIPT's competition here
AIFU vs AMSF Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 584.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while AMSF trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMSF's competition here
AIFU vs ITIC Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 459M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while ITIC trades at $243.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ITIC's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC's competition here
AIFU vs MBI Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 307.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while MBI trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MBI's competition here
AIFU vs JRVR Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while JRVR trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check JRVR's competition here
AIFU vs OSG Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while OSG trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check OSG's competition here
AIFU vs ICCH Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ICCH's competition here
AIFU vs FBDC Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while FBDC trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FBDC's competition here
AIFU vs SNC Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check SNC's competition here
AIFU vs TIG Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIG's competition here
AIFU vs PROS Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check PROS's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC-WT Comparison April 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 161.9M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.38, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.12, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC-WT's competition here