AIFU Inc.
AIFU Inc. (AIFU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AIFU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU | $1.58 | +4.64% | 185.3M | -0.05 | -$32.89 | N/A |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $50.58 | +0.62% | 13.6B | 18.00 | $2.81 | +4.00% |
| AIZ | $239.67 | +2.51% | 11.9B | 12.29 | $19.50 | +1.41% |
| FAF | $71.04 | +1.75% | 7.2B | 10.93 | $6.50 | +3.09% |
| ACT | $44.04 | +1.90% | 6.1B | 9.53 | $4.62 | +1.90% |
| ESNT | $63.13 | +2.52% | 5.9B | 9.15 | $6.90 | +2.02% |
| MTG | $26.75 | +0.64% | 5.7B | 8.49 | $3.15 | +2.24% |
| RDN | $38.06 | +1.17% | 5.2B | 8.77 | $4.34 | +2.68% |
| RYAN | $31.31 | -1.26% | 4.1B | 38.19 | $0.82 | +1.57% |
Stock Comparison
AIFU vs HIPO-WT Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
AIFU vs FNF Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while FNF trades at $50.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FNF's competition here
AIFU vs AIZ Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while AIZ trades at $239.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AIZ's competition here
AIFU vs FAF Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while FAF trades at $71.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FAF's competition here
AIFU vs ACT Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while ACT trades at $44.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ACT's competition here
AIFU vs ESNT Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while ESNT trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ESNT's competition here
AIFU vs MTG Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while MTG trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MTG's competition here
AIFU vs RDN Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while RDN trades at $38.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RDN's competition here
AIFU vs RYAN Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while RYAN trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RYAN's competition here
AIFU vs AGO Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while AGO trades at $75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AGO's competition here
AIFU vs NMIH Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while NMIH trades at $38.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check NMIH's competition here
AIFU vs TRUP Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while TRUP trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TRUP's competition here
AIFU vs EIG Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 929.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while EIG trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 91.33. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check EIG's competition here
AIFU vs HIPO Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 710.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while HIPO trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check HIPO's competition here
AIFU vs TIPT Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while TIPT trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIPT's competition here
AIFU vs AMSF Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 567.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while AMSF trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMSF's competition here
AIFU vs ITIC Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 449.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while ITIC trades at $238.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ITIC's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC's competition here
AIFU vs MBI Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while MBI trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MBI's competition here
AIFU vs OSG Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while OSG trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check OSG's competition here
AIFU vs JRVR Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while JRVR trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check JRVR's competition here
AIFU vs ICCH Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ICCH's competition here
AIFU vs FBDC Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while FBDC trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FBDC's competition here
AIFU vs PROS Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check PROS's competition here
AIFU vs TIG Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIG's competition here
AIFU vs SNC Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check SNC's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC-WT Comparison May 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 185.3M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.58, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is -1.50%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC-WT's competition here