W. R. Berkley Corporation
W. R. Berkley Corporation WRB Peers
See (WRB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRB | $71.49 | +1.03% | 27.1B | 16.59 | $4.31 | +2.21% |
| PGR | $261.66 | +1.54% | 153.4B | 17.66 | $14.82 | +1.87% |
| CB | $283.80 | +1.33% | 113.7B | 13.68 | $20.75 | +1.30% |
| TRV | $264.13 | +2.64% | 59.8B | 14.39 | $18.36 | +1.61% |
| ALL-PH | $21.15 | +0.48% | 52.7B | 3.43 | $6.17 | +1.94% |
| ALL | $198.00 | +1.70% | 52.4B | 13.52 | $14.65 | +1.94% |
| ALL-PB | $25.68 | -0.04% | 51B | 2.13 | $12.04 | +1.94% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.94% |
| WRB-PE | $22.70 | +0.09% | 29.1B | 4.94 | $4.60 | +2.21% |
| WRB-PG | $16.79 | +0.18% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.21% |
Stock Comparison
WRB vs PGR Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while PGR trades at $261.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs CB Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while CB trades at $283.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs TRV Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while TRV trades at $264.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ALL-PH Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ALL-PH trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ALL Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ALL trades at $198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ALL-PB Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ALL-PB trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ALL-PG Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs WRB-PE Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while WRB-PE trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs WRB-PG Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while WRB-PG trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs WRB-PH Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while WRB-PH trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs WRB-PF Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while WRB-PF trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs MKL Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while MKL trades at $2,002.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs CINF Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while CINF trades at $148.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs L Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while L trades at $92.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas L's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs CNA Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while CNA trades at $45.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs KNSL Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while KNSL trades at $476.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AFGC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AFGC trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AFGB Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AFGB trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AFGE Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AFGE trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AFGD Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AFGD trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AFG Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AFG trades at $127.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AXS Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AXS trades at $99.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AXS-PE Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AXS-PE trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ALL-PJ Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs RLI Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while RLI trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs THG Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while THG trades at $163.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs SIGI Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while SIGI trades at $86.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ALL-PI Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ALL-PI trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs WTM Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while WTM trades at $1,785.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 167.63. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs KMPB Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while KMPB trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs KMPR Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while KMPR trades at $63.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs PLMR Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while PLMR trades at $147.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs MCY Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while MCY trades at $67.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs HGTY-WT Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs LMND Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while LMND trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AHL Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AHL trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs SKWD Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while SKWD trades at $56.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ROOT Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ROOT trades at $124.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs STC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while STC trades at $66.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AHL-PE Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AHL-PE trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.67. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs HMN Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while HMN trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs HCI Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while HCI trades at $146.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs MHLA Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while MHLA trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs PRA Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while PRA trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AHL-PD Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AHL-PD trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -82.26. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs BOW Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while BOW trades at $35.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs SAFT Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while SAFT trades at $77.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ARGO Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs SIGIP Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while SIGIP trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs HGTY Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while HGTY trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs UVE Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 730.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while UVE trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs UFCS Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 716.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while UFCS trades at $28.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs HRTG Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 714.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while HRTG trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs DGICA Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 687M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while DGICA trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs DGICB Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 666.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while DGICB trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ACIC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ACIC trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs GBLI Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 447.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while GBLI trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AII Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 348.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AII trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs UIHC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs NODK Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 271.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while NODK trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs CNFRZ Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 231M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while CNFRZ trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs KINS Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while KINS trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs CNFR Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while CNFR trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs UNAM Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs HALL Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 97.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs ARGO-PA Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 327. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.11. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AFHBL Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs MILE Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs Y Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs AHL-PC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs MILEW Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs FNHC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs NSEC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.
WRB vs STFC Comparison
WRB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB stands at 27.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB is priced at $71.49, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.59, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB.