W.R. Berkley Corporation 4.25%
W.R. Berkley Corporation 4.25% WRB-PG Peers
See (WRB-PG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRB-PG | $16.49 | +0.79% | 28.3B | N/A | N/A | +2.18% |
| PGR | $261.62 | +0.75% | 153.4B | 17.65 | $14.82 | +1.88% |
| CB | $283.57 | +0.27% | 113.6B | 13.67 | $20.75 | +1.30% |
| TRV | $262.95 | +0.82% | 59.6B | 14.33 | $18.36 | +1.62% |
| ALL-PH | $20.87 | +0.53% | 52.4B | 3.42 | $6.11 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PB | $26.23 | +0.04% | 51.7B | 2.18 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| ALL | $194.15 | +1.68% | 51.4B | 13.26 | $14.65 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| WRB-PE | $22.52 | +0.76% | 28.8B | 4.88 | $4.60 | +2.18% |
| WRB-PH | $16.10 | +0.69% | 28.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.18% |
Stock Comparison
WRB-PG vs PGR Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while PGR trades at $261.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs CB Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while CB trades at $283.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs TRV Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while TRV trades at $262.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ALL-PH Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ALL-PH trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ALL-PB Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ALL-PB trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ALL Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ALL trades at $194.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ALL-PG Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs WRB-PE Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while WRB-PE trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs WRB-PH Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while WRB-PH trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs WRB-PF Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while WRB-PF trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs WRB Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while WRB trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs MKL Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while MKL trades at $1,995.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs CINF Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while CINF trades at $145.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs L Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while L trades at $90.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs CNA Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while CNA trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs KNSL Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while KNSL trades at $476.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AFGC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AFGC trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AFGB Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AFGB trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AFGD Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AFGD trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AFGE Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AFGE trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AFG Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AFG trades at $124.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AXS Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AXS trades at $102.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AXS-PE Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AXS-PE trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ALL-PJ Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs RLI Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while RLI trades at $71.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs THG Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while THG trades at $168.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs SIGI Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while SIGI trades at $85.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ALL-PI Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ALL-PI trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs WTM Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while WTM trades at $1,800.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 169.31. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs KMPR Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while KMPR trades at $64.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs PLMR Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while PLMR trades at $153.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs KMPB Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while KMPB trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs HGTY-WT Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs MCY Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while MCY trades at $65.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs LMND Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while LMND trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AHL Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AHL trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs SKWD Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while SKWD trades at $56.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ROOT Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ROOT trades at $127.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 38.49. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AHL-PE Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AHL-PE trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs STC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while STC trades at $64.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs HMN Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while HMN trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs HCI Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while HCI trades at $150.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs MHLA Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while MHLA trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs BOW Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while BOW trades at $37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AHL-PD Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AHL-PD trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -81.73. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs PRA Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while PRA trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs SAFT Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while SAFT trades at $78.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ARGO Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs SIGIP Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while SIGIP trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs HGTY Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while HGTY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs UVE Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 767.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while UVE trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs UFCS Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 724.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while UFCS trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs HRTG Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 712.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while HRTG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs DGICB Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 710M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while DGICB trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs DGICA Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while DGICA trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ACIC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 510.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ACIC trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs GBLI Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 484.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while GBLI trades at $33.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AII Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 349.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AII trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs UIHC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs NODK Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 261.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while NODK trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs CNFRZ Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 237.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while CNFRZ trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs KINS Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 216.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while KINS trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs CNFR Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while CNFR trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs UNAM Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs HALL Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs ARGO-PA Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 326. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.01. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs FNHC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs Y Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AFHBL Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs AHL-PC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs STFC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs MILE Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs MILEW Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.
WRB-PG vs NSEC Comparison
WRB-PG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PG stands at 28.3B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PG is priced at $16.49, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PG's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PG is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PG.