WANG & LEE GROUP, Inc.
WANG & LEE GROUP, Inc. WLGS Peers
See (WLGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLGS | $0.06 | -17.84% | 1.8M | -0.33 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| PWR | $362.01 | +1.05% | 53.6B | 58.39 | $6.20 | +0.11% |
| EME | $485.82 | +1.65% | 21.7B | 21.49 | $22.61 | +0.21% |
| FIX | $500.69 | +1.62% | 17.7B | 29.47 | $16.99 | +0.30% |
| J | $129.75 | +3.06% | 15.6B | 42.82 | $3.03 | +0.90% |
| ACM | $113.06 | +0.96% | 15B | 24.21 | $4.67 | +0.85% |
| APG | $48.65 | +1.67% | 13.5B | 79.75 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MTZ | $163.59 | +0.92% | 12.9B | 60.14 | $2.72 | N/A |
| STN | $107.98 | +1.18% | 12.3B | 43.89 | $2.46 | +0.57% |
| TTEK | $35.96 | -0.28% | 9.5B | 52.12 | $0.69 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
WLGS vs PWR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while PWR trades at $362.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs EME Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while EME trades at $485.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FIX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FIX trades at $500.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs J Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, J has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while J trades at $129.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas J's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ACM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ACM trades at $113.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs APG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while APG trades at $48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 79.75. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MTZ Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MTZ trades at $163.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 60.14. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs STN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while STN trades at $107.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 43.89. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs TTEK Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while TTEK trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 52.12. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BLD Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BLD trades at $300.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FLR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FLR trades at $50.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs KBR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while KBR trades at $53.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs DY Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while DY trades at $233.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs STRL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while STRL trades at $209.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ROAD Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ROAD trades at $105.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 90.61. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs IESC Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while IESC trades at $270.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs PRIM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while PRIM trades at $75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs GVA Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while GVA trades at $89.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ECG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ECG trades at $59.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AGX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AGX trades at $218.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MYRG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MYRG trades at $164.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs TPC Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while TPC trades at $42.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs LMB Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while LMB trades at $141.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 50.86. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs NVEE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while NVEE trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 51.31. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AMRC Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 870.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AMRC trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs WLDN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 833.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while WLDN trades at $57.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs GLDD Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 798.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while GLDD trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BWMN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 471.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BWMN trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 160.82. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MTRX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MTRX trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ORN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 334.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ORN trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 84.65. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SKBL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 329.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SKBL trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 389.33. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BBCP Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 322.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BBCP trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs RITR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 321.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while RITR trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs JUNE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while JUNE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SLND Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SLND trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AENZ Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ESOA Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 176.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ESOA trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MIMI Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MIMI trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 215.00. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIMI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs CSLRW Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs OEG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BLNK Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BLNK trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs VATE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while VATE trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SHIM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SHIM trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MSW Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MSW trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSW's ROE of +3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ONEG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ONEG trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 42.30. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONEG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AGFY Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AGFY trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs DRTT Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs PGHL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FGL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FGL trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs WXM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while WXM trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WXM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SKK Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SKK trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs WLMS Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FBGL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FBGL trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -12.81. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SUNE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SUNE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNE's ROE of +161.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ENG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs OIG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SCCI Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WLGS has daily volatility of 11.57 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.
WLGS vs IEA Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs HIL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ATCX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ATCX trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.