WANG & LEE GROUP, Inc.
WANG & LEE GROUP, Inc. WLGS Peers
See (WLGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLGS | $0.06 | +22.29% | 1.8M | -0.34 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| PWR | $383.78 | +0.97% | 56.9B | 61.97 | $6.19 | +0.13% |
| EME | $554.22 | +1.21% | 24.8B | 24.53 | $22.60 | +0.18% |
| FIX | $539.50 | +1.07% | 19.1B | 32.40 | $16.67 | +0.28% |
| J | $135.14 | -0.79% | 16.2B | 44.62 | $3.03 | +1.08% |
| ACM | $114.44 | -1.04% | 15.1B | 24.56 | $4.66 | +1.06% |
| APG | $34.41 | -0.55% | 14.3B | 83.95 | $0.41 | N/A |
| MTZ | $170.24 | +0.87% | 13.4B | 62.31 | $2.73 | N/A |
| STN | $110.43 | +0.03% | 12.6B | 45.03 | $2.45 | +0.56% |
| BLD | $377.87 | -1.79% | 10.8B | 19.14 | $19.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLGS vs PWR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while PWR trades at $383.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 61.97. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs EME Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while EME trades at $554.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FIX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FIX trades at $539.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs J Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, J has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while J trades at $135.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas J's P/E ratio is 44.62. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ACM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ACM trades at $114.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs APG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while APG trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 83.95. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MTZ Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MTZ trades at $170.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 62.31. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs STN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while STN trades at $110.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 45.03. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BLD Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BLD trades at $377.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs TTEK Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while TTEK trades at $36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 53.03. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FLR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FLR trades at $52.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs STRL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while STRL trades at $241.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs DY Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while DY trades at $252.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs IESC Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while IESC trades at $309.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs KBR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while KBR trades at $46.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ROAD Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ROAD trades at $105.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 90.77. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs PRIM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while PRIM trades at $86.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs GVA Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while GVA trades at $93.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ECG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ECG trades at $68.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AGX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AGX trades at $212.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MYRG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MYRG trades at $183.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 85.40. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs TPC Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while TPC trades at $48.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs LMB Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while LMB trades at $149.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 53.82. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs NVEE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while NVEE trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 51.52. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs WLDN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while WLDN trades at $73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AMRC Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 940.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AMRC trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs GLDD Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 751.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while GLDD trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BWMN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BWMN trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 179.06. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MTRX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 368.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MTRX trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BBCP Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 355.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BBCP trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ORN Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 339.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ORN trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 85.80. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs RITR Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 280.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while RITR trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SLND Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 252.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SLND trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs JUNE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while JUNE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AENZ Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MIMI Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MIMI trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 238.67. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MIMI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ESOA Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ESOA trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs CSLRW Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs OEG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs BLNK Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while BLNK trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ONEG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ONEG trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ONEG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs VATE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while VATE trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SHIM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SHIM trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs MSW Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while MSW trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MSW's ROE of +3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs AGFY Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while AGFY trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SKBL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SKBL trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs DRTT Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DRTT's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs WXM Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while WXM trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WXM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs PGHL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FGL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FGL trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SKK Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SKK trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SKK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs WLMS Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs FBGL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while FBGL trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SUNE Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SUNE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs ENG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs OIG Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs IEA Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs SCCI Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WLGS has daily volatility of 36.22 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.
WLGS vs ATCX Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while ATCX trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.
WLGS vs HIL Comparison
WLGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLGS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLGS is priced at $0.06, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLGS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLGS is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLGS.