Vertiv Holdings Co
Vertiv Holdings Co VRT Peers
See (VRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRT | $128.41 | +0.98% | 48.9B | 74.64 | $1.72 | +0.11% |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| HUBB | $408.41 | +0.44% | 21.8B | 27.59 | $14.80 | +1.27% |
| NVT | $73.25 | -0.14% | 12.1B | 50.84 | $1.44 | +1.06% |
| AYI | $298.34 | -1.65% | 9.1B | 23.54 | $12.68 | +0.21% |
| BE | $23.92 | +7.84% | 5.6B | 1195.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $132.50 | +0.14% | 5B | 66.92 | $1.98 | +0.30% |
| WIRE | $289.84 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 15.22 | $19.04 | +0.01% |
| ENS | $85.77 | -1.14% | 3.3B | 9.54 | $8.99 | +1.11% |
| HAYW | $13.80 | -0.07% | 3B | 24.63 | $0.56 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VRT vs ABB Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs HUBB Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while HUBB trades at $408.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs NVT Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while NVT trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs AYI Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while AYI trades at $298.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs BE Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while BE trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 1195.00. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs AEIS Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while AEIS trades at $132.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 66.92. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs WIRE Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ENS Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ENS trades at $85.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs HAYW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while HAYW trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs POWL Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while POWL trades at $210.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ATKR Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ATKR trades at $70.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ENVX Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ENVX trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs PLUG Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while PLUG trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs HOLI Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ENR Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ENR trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs EOSEW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while EOSEW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs EOSE Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while EOSE trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs MVST Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while MVST trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs PLPC Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 789.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while PLPC trades at $159.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ADSE Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 756.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ADSE trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs AMPX Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 508.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while AMPX trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs KE Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 468.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while KE trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs AMPX-WT Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs SLDP Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 392.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while SLDP trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs SES-WT Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while SES-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs LTBR Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while LTBR trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs AIRJ Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 278.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while AIRJ trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 51.44. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs EAF Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while EAF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs FREY Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs TE Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while TE trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs NVX Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while NVX trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ULBI Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ULBI trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ELVA Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ELVA trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -85.25. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ESP Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ESP trades at $45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs FCEL Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while FCEL trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs SVT Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.33. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs NEOV Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while NEOV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs SKYX Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while SKYX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs MVSTW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while MVSTW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs RAYA Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while RAYA trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -62.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ADSEW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 107.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ADSEW trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs CBAT Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while CBAT trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs OPTT Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while OPTT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs RFIL Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while RFIL trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -46.21. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs SLDPW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while SLDPW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs CHEV Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while CHEV trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -55.56. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs NEOVW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while NEOVW trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ELPW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ELPW trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +6.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs IPWR Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while IPWR trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs APWC Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while APWC trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs PPSI Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while PPSI trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs FLUX Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while FLUX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs OESX Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while OESX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs GWH Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while GWH trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs GWH-WT Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs SDST Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while SDST trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs CCTG Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while CCTG trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs PITA Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs STI Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while STI trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas STI's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STI's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs NXU Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NXU's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs POLA Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while POLA trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs DCFC Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs XPON Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while XPON trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs DFLIW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while DFLIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs SDSTW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while SDSTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs DFLI Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while DFLI trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs DCFCW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs BLNKW Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.
VRT vs ENR-PA Comparison
VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 48.9B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $128.41, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 74.64, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.