Vertiv Holdings Co

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 99.38B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ABBNY trades at $54.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 98.46B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ABLZF trades at $53.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69.02B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ABB trades at $37.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 52.50B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DLEGF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 40.84B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while MIELY trades at $39.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 39.39B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while MIELF trades at $18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 30.39B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LGRDY trades at $23.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 27.34B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LGRVF trades at $104.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 19.03B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while HUBB trades at $356.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 17.57B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PRYMF trades at $61.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 17.06B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PRYMY trades at $29.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NVT trades at $61.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 42.70. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AYI trades at $256.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FELTF trades at $44.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FELTY trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while YASKF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PHPPY trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NEXNY trades at $55.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NXPRF trades at $110.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while OSAGY trades at $15.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while WIRE trades at $289.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AEIS trades at $112.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NRKBF trades at $78.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while BE trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 881.00. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ENS trades at $93.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FUWAF trades at $48.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while HAYW trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SFFYF trades at $21.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while YASKY trades at $41.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ATKR trades at $67.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATKR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FUWAY trades at $15.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while POWL trades at $174.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LDGYY trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LGYRF trades at $63.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while HOLI trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ENR trades at $21.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while EOSE trades at $6.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ENVX trades at $6.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 884.77M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ALFNF trades at $40.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 880.21M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PLUG trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.36M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while VARGF trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 821.08M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while HMDPF trades at $68.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 728.77M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ADSE trades at $13.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ADSE's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 716.30M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while MVST trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 712.85M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ADSEW trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 670.39M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PLPC trades at $135.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633.05M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 597.41M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while VLXGF trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.85M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.63M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 557.59M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.07M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.82M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 447.88M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while KE trades at $18.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 417.28M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 343.06M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while COSXF trades at $8.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 298.35M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AMPX trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 285.52M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AIRJ trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 284.94M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SES-WT trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.87M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.82M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FREY trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FREY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 241.25M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AMPX-WT trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 234.26M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ELPW trades at $4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 233.31M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while XPPLF trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 215.97M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while TE trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 201.94M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NVX trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 201.28M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while EAF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EAF's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 199.14M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LTBR trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 192.91M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SLDP trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 190.05M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NVNXF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 176.16M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CPWHF trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 162.79M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CRPHY trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 144.73M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PCELF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.40M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 111.95M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NEOV trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 109.64M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ELVA trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is -68.37. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ELVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SKYX trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 100.14M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while EOSEW trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 99.23M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AFGYF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AFGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 97.22M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FCEL trades at $4.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.55M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while VARTY trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 87.45M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FCELB trades at $305.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -990.29. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 87.22M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ESP trades at $31.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.33M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 84.00M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ULBI trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 82.71M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ILIKF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 81.19M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while OPTT trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 80.94M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CBAT trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CBAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 79.83M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while TGEN trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -16.82. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 66.05M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while RAYA trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 61.08M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while MVSTW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.63M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 56.81M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DIALF trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 53.86M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while EXROF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 51.28M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GWH-WT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.84M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 43.53M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while IPWR trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 42.96M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NEOVW trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 41.61M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while RFIL trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RFIL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 41.56M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GELNF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 35.05M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while MNSEF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 33.58M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CHEV trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHEV's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 33.20M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while APWC trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 31.69M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FLUX trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 30.11M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SDST trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SDST's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 27.58M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PPSI trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 26.99M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GWH trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GWH's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 26.93M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SLDPW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 26.84M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SVT trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 22.57M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while OESX trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 15.42M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NHHHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 14.30M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while IHGP trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 14.07M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while STI trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CCTG trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PITA trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 10.64M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LPSIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 10.36M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while QBAK trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 10.11M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ORBT trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.12M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.39M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while NXU trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 5.25M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DFEL trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 4.86M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ASTO trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while POLA trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POLA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while HYEG trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DFLIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of -12.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DFLI trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DFLI's ROE of -12.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.39M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GPGC trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CECBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while XPON trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XPON's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 3.11M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SDSTW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LPENF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while EGTYF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.84M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while IDGC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while OZSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while TOGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while BSTK trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.01M. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ENEVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980070.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 927711.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CAPC trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAPC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 665079.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while KRFG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569012.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while SGLN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SGLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 561605.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while USLG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 357398.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while PSTO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 265200.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while HLXW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 203961.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 40246.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AIPG trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 30251.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DCFCQ trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 30248.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DCFC trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 21391.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while TRUL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20735.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while EIPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EIPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 14027.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13607.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while DLYT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 12993.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while CHGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11283.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while FDEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FDEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6534.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LSCG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6061.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GNAL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5947.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GCHT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GCHT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4373.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while USGA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to USGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3249.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while GCLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2631.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2347.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while TMGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TMGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to TMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to AXPWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, MCELQ has a market cap of 756.00. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while MCELQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas MCELQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MCELQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to MCELQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, BLNKW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, LCHIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while LCHIF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas LCHIF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LCHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to LCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, ENR-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.

VRT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRT stands at 35.85B. In comparison, REFXD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VRT is priced at $94.08, while REFXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.70, whereas REFXD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to REFXD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRT is more volatile compared to REFXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRT.