Unum Group

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while AFL trades at $102.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while MFC trades at $30.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while MET trades at $77.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while MET-PE trades at $23.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while MET-PA trades at $23.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while PRS trades at $24.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while PRU trades at $104.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while PRH trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while PUK trades at $24.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while MET-PF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while GL trades at $122.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while GL-PD trades at $16.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while PRI trades at $266.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while JXN trades at $88.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 67.09. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while LNC trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while LNC-PD trades at $27.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while AEL trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while FG trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while FGN trades at $26.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while CNO trades at $37.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while GNW trades at $7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while BHF trades at $50.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while BHFAL trades at $18.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while BHFAP trades at $15.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while JXN-PA trades at $25.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while NWLI trades at $499.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while MHNC trades at $17.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 894.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while BHFAO trades at $15.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 710.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while BHFAN trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 617.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while BHFAM trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while ABLLW trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 520.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while ABL trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 512.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while ABLLL trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while CIA trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while VERY trades at $11.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while MDWT trades at $26.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while AAME trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while IHC trades at $57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while LFC trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.48, while GWGH trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.49, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.