Unum Group

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MFC trades at $36.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MFC's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while AFL trades at $112.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AFL's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MET trades at $78.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MET-PE trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET-PE's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MET-PA trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET-PA's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while PUK trades at $30.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PUK's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while PRU trades at $102.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRU's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MET-PF trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET-PF's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while GL trades at $144.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GL's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while PRH trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRH's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while PRS trades at $24.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRS's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while PRI trades at $257.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRI's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while JXN trades at $113.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check JXN's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while LNC trades at $40.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check LNC's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while LNC-PD trades at $26.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check LNC-PD's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while FGN trades at $26.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check FGN's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while AEL trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AEL's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while CNO trades at $42.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check CNO's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while BHF trades at $63.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHF's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while GNW trades at $8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GNW's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while FG trades at $27.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check FG's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while BHFAP trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAP's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while ABLLL trades at $26.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check ABLLL's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while BHFAL trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAL's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MLCIL trades at $23.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MLCIL's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AEL-PB's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while NWLI trades at $499.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check NWLI's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AEL-PA's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while JXN-PA trades at $26.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check JXN-PA's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MHNC trades at $14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MHNC's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while GL-PD trades at $137.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GL-PD's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while BHFAO trades at $17.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAO's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 852.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while ABX trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 174.40. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check ABX's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 852.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while ABL trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 174.40. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check ABL's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 791.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while BHFAN trades at $13.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAN's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 719.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while BHFAM trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAM's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 678.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while LIFE trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check LIFE's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check ABLLW's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while CIA trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check CIA's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while VERY trades at $11.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check VERY's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MDWT trades at $26.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MDWT's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while AAME trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AAME's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while IHC trades at $57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check IHC's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while LFC trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check LFC's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while GWGH trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GWGH's competition here

UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $73.47, while MLG trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.25, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MLG's competition here