United Insurance Holdings Corp.
United Insurance Holdings Corp. UIHC Peers
See (UIHC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UIHC | $7.93 | +1.28% | 343.3M | -0.75 | -$10.60 | N/A |
| PGR | $279.17 | -0.37% | 163.7B | 18.84 | $14.82 | +1.75% |
| CB | $293.86 | +0.80% | 117.8B | 14.15 | $20.76 | +1.24% |
| TRV | $273.74 | +1.00% | 62B | 14.91 | $18.36 | +1.54% |
| ALL | $208.04 | +0.67% | 55.1B | 14.21 | $14.64 | +1.36% |
| ALL-PB | $26.01 | +0.12% | 54.8B | 2.16 | $12.04 | +1.36% |
| ALL-PH | $20.90 | -0.52% | 54.4B | 3.38 | $6.18 | +1.36% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | N/A | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.36% |
| WRB | $74.22 | +0.47% | 28.2B | 17.22 | $4.31 | +2.33% |
| WRB-PF | $19.60 | -0.25% | 28B | N/A | N/A | +2.33% |
Stock Comparison
UIHC vs PGR Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 163.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while PGR trades at $279.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs CB Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 117.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while CB trades at $293.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs TRV Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while TRV trades at $273.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ALL Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ALL trades at $208.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ALL-PB Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ALL-PB trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ALL-PH Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ALL-PH trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ALL-PG Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs WRB Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while WRB trades at $74.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs WRB-PF Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while WRB-PF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs WRB-PE Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while WRB-PE trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs WRB-PG Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while WRB-PG trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs WRB-PH Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while WRB-PH trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs MKL Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while MKL trades at $1,968.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs CINF Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while CINF trades at $151.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs L Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while L trades at $89.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs CNA Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while CNA trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs KNSL Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while KNSL trades at $476.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AFGC Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AFGC trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AFG Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AFG trades at $125.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AFGE Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AFGE trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AFGB Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AFGB trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AFGD Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AFGD trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AXS Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AXS trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AXS-PE Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AXS-PE trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ALL-PJ Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs RLI Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while RLI trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs THG Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while THG trades at $175.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs SIGI Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while SIGI trades at $87.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ALL-PI Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ALL-PI trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs WTM Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while WTM trades at $1,818.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 171.92. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs PLMR Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while PLMR trades at $166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs KMPR Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while KMPR trades at $63.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs KMPB Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while KMPB trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs HGTY-WT Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs MCY Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while MCY trades at $65.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AHL Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AHL trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs LMND Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while LMND trades at $39.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs SKWD Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while SKWD trades at $62.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ROOT Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ROOT trades at $151.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs HCI Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while HCI trades at $168.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AHL-PE Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AHL-PE trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -81.60. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs HMN Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while HMN trades at $43.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs STC Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while STC trades at $61.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs MHLA Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while MHLA trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs SAFT Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while SAFT trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AHL-PD Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AHL-PD trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -81.93. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs BOW Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while BOW trades at $36.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs PRA Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while PRA trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ARGO Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs SIGIP Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while SIGIP trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs HGTY Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 908.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while HGTY trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 47.67. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs HRTG Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 776.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while HRTG trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs UVE Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 773M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while UVE trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs DGICB Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while DGICB trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs UFCS Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while UFCS trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs DGICA Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 686.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while DGICA trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ACIC Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 528M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ACIC trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs GBLI Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 446.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while GBLI trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AII Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AII trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs NODK Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while NODK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs CNFRZ Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while CNFRZ trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs KINS Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while KINS trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs CNFR Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while CNFR trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs UNAM Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs HALL Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs ARGO-PA Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while ARGO-PA trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs FNHC Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AHL-PC Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs NSEC Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs Y Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs AFHBL Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs STFC Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs MILEW Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.
UIHC vs MILE Comparison
UIHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UIHC stands at 343.3M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UIHC is priced at $7.93, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UIHC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, UIHC's ROE is +1.59%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UIHC is more volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UIHC.