Domtar Corporation
Domtar Corporation UFS Peers
See (UFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFS | $55.49 | +0.02% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SUZ | $9.27 | -1.49% | 11.5B | -77.25 | -$0.12 | +2.91% |
| LPX | $87.49 | -0.80% | 6.1B | 15.32 | $5.71 | +1.23% |
| UFPI | $99.24 | -1.47% | 6B | 16.24 | $6.11 | +1.37% |
| WFG | $73.88 | -1.18% | 5.7B | -2462.67 | -$0.03 | +1.72% |
| SLVM | $50.24 | -1.57% | 2B | 7.38 | $6.81 | +3.58% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | N/A |
| CLW | $27.68 | +2.54% | 450M | -5.95 | -$4.65 | N/A |
| MATV | $6.49 | +0.15% | 354.6M | -0.79 | -$8.20 | +6.06% |
Stock Comparison
UFS vs SUZ Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while SUZ trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -77.25. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs LPX Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while LPX trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs UFPI Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while UFPI trades at $99.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs WFG Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while WFG trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -2462.67. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs SLVM Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while SLVM trades at $50.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs RFP Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs SWM Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs CLW Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 450M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while CLW trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs MATV Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while MATV trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs MERC Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while MERC trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs GLT Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs EVA Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs NWGL Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while NWGL trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs JCTCF Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs JCTC Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while JCTC trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs ITP Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while ITP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs NP Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while NP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.
UFS vs VRS Comparison
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.