United Fire Group, Inc.
United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UFCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFCS | $37.39 | +1.64% | 941M | 8.29 | $4.45 | +1.85% |
| CB | $331.43 | +0.57% | 129.5B | 12.81 | $25.69 | +1.18% |
| PGR | $205.55 | +0.18% | 120.2B | 10.67 | $19.23 | +6.74% |
| TRV | $306.60 | +1.52% | 67.5B | 11.03 | $27.42 | +1.45% |
| ALL-PB | $26.14 | -0.04% | 54.5B | 2.17 | $12.04 | +1.97% |
| ALL | $208.79 | +1.83% | 53.5B | 5.42 | $38.05 | +1.97% |
| ALL-PH | $20.69 | -1.36% | 51.7B | 3.31 | $6.28 | +1.97% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.97% |
| WRB | $68.93 | +0.33% | 26.1B | 15.45 | $4.45 | +2.69% |
| CINF | $166.90 | +1.63% | 25.6B | 10.80 | $15.17 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
UFCS vs CB Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 129.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while CB trades at $331.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CB's competition here
UFCS vs PGR Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while PGR trades at $205.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PGR's competition here
UFCS vs TRV Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while TRV trades at $306.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check TRV's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PB Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ALL-PB trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
UFCS vs ALL Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ALL trades at $208.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PH Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ALL-PH trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PG Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
UFCS vs WRB Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while WRB trades at $68.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB's competition here
UFCS vs CINF Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while CINF trades at $166.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CINF's competition here
UFCS vs MKL Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while MKL trades at $1,971.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MKL's competition here
UFCS vs L Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while L trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check L's competition here
UFCS vs CNA Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while CNA trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CNA's competition here
UFCS vs AFG Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AFG trades at $128.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFG's competition here
UFCS vs KNSL Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while KNSL trades at $363.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KNSL's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PE Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while WRB-PE trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
UFCS vs AXS Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AXS trades at $101.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AXS's competition here
UFCS vs AXS-PE Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AXS-PE trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AXS-PE's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PF Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while WRB-PF trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PJ Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PG Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while WRB-PG trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
UFCS vs THG Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while THG trades at $175.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check THG's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PH Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while WRB-PH trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
UFCS vs RLI Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while RLI trades at $61.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check RLI's competition here
UFCS vs WTM Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while WTM trades at $2,209.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WTM's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PI Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ALL-PI trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
UFCS vs MCY Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while MCY trades at $90.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MCY's competition here
UFCS vs SIGI Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while SIGI trades at $76.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SIGI's competition here
UFCS vs LMND Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while LMND trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check LMND's competition here
UFCS vs HGTY-WT Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
UFCS vs HGTY Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while HGTY trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HGTY's competition here
UFCS vs AHL Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL's competition here
UFCS vs PLMR Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while PLMR trades at $119.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PLMR's competition here
UFCS vs AHL-PD Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AHL-PD trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -84.44. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL-PD's competition here
UFCS vs SLDE Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while SLDE trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SLDE's competition here
UFCS vs HCI Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while HCI trades at $166.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HCI's competition here
UFCS vs SKWD Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while SKWD trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SKWD's competition here
UFCS vs STC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while STC trades at $64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check STC's competition here
UFCS vs AHL-PE Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AHL-PE trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -84.36. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL-PE's competition here
UFCS vs AFGB Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AFGB trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGB's competition here
UFCS vs KMPR Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while KMPR trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KMPR's competition here
UFCS vs HMN Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while HMN trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HMN's competition here
UFCS vs AFGD Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AFGD trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGD's competition here
UFCS vs AFGC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AFGC trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGC's competition here
UFCS vs AFGE Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AFGE trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGE's competition here
UFCS vs KMPB Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while KMPB trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KMPB's competition here
UFCS vs PRA Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while PRA trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PRA's competition here
UFCS vs SAFT Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while SAFT trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SAFT's competition here
UFCS vs ARGO Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ARGO's competition here
UFCS vs MHLA Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while MHLA trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MHLA's competition here
UFCS vs SIGIP Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 994.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while SIGIP trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SIGIP's competition here
UFCS vs UVE Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 961.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while UVE trades at $34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check UVE's competition here
UFCS vs ASIC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 949.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ASIC trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ASIC's competition here
UFCS vs HRTG Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 872M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while HRTG trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HRTG's competition here
UFCS vs BOW Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while BOW trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check BOW's competition here
UFCS vs DGICA Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 616.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while DGICA trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check DGICA's competition here
UFCS vs ROOT Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 601.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ROOT trades at $44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ROOT's competition here
UFCS vs DGICB Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 558.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while DGICB trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check DGICB's competition here
UFCS vs ACIC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 551.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ACIC trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ACIC's competition here
UFCS vs GBLI Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 415.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while GBLI trades at $29.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check GBLI's competition here
UFCS vs AII Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AII trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AII's competition here
UFCS vs UIHC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check UIHC's competition here
UFCS vs NODK Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while NODK trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 120.27. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check NODK's competition here
UFCS vs PRHIZ Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while PRHIZ trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PRHIZ's competition here
UFCS vs KINS Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while KINS trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KINS's competition here
UFCS vs CNFR Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CNFR's competition here
UFCS vs CNFRZ Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
UFCS vs PRHI Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while PRHI trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PRHI's competition here
UFCS vs UNAM Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check UNAM's competition here
UFCS vs HALL Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HALL's competition here
UFCS vs ARGO-PA Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
UFCS vs MILEW Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MILEW's competition here
UFCS vs NSEC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check NSEC's competition here
UFCS vs AFHBL Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFHBL's competition here
UFCS vs Y Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check Y's competition here
UFCS vs MILE Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MILE's competition here
UFCS vs GFZ Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check GFZ's competition here
UFCS vs STFC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check STFC's competition here
UFCS vs AHL-PC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL-PC's competition here
UFCS vs FNHC Comparison March 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 941M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $37.39, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check FNHC's competition here