United Airlines Holdings, Inc.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 386.77B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ANYYY trades at $25.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 38.74B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ANNSF trades at $258.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ANNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 31.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while DAL trades at $48.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 27.71B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AIPUF trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to AIPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 23.38B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AFLYY trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ICAGY has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ICAGY trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ICAGY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ICAGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ICAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 17.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while BABWF trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to BABWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 17.76B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while LUV trades at $31.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 17.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AIPUY trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AIPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CEA trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 15.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AIRYY trades at $12.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is -201.17. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AIRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 15.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AICAF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AICAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to AICAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SINGY trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 14.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SINGF trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SINGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 14.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while APTPF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to APTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 12.79B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ARRPY trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ARRPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while RYAOF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to RYAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 12.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CHKIF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to CHKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 11.94B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AEOXF trades at $120.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AEOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 11.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while GPAEF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to GPAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while PAC trades at $216.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 10.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while LTM trades at $33.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 9.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while TKHVY trades at $72.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to TKHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while QABSY trades at $31.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to QABSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ASR trades at $324.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ALNPY trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ALNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, QUBSF has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while QUBSF trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas QUBSF's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to QUBSF's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to QUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 8.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ASRMF trades at $32.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ASRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ALNPF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ALNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while DLAKY trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while DLAKF trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to DLAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CHEAF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CHEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 8.06B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JAPSY trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while UZAPF trades at $259.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to UZAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CPCAY trades at $6.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ACKDF trades at $4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 66.86. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to ACKDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 7.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CPCAF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to CPCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FLGZY trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to FLGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 7.71B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AUKNY trades at $22.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 2293.00. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AUKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JPNRF trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to JPNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AAL trades at $11.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ALK trades at $52.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FPRUY trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to FPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FPRUF trades at $65.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to FPRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 5.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JOBY trades at $6.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while EJTTF trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to EJTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ESYJY trades at $7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while RYAAY trades at $49.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FGWLF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FGWLF trades at $56.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FGWLF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FGWLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to FGWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while GAERF trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to GAERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while OMAB trades at $95.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while GOL trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ACDVF trades at $12.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CPA trades at $98.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while PBI-PB trades at $19.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SKYW trades at $85.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CAAP trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SPASF trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SPASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AAWW trades at $102.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JAIRF trades at $30.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to JAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JTTRY trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to JTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while WZZZY trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to WZZZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while WZZAF trades at $21.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to WZZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AFRAF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AFRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while TAVHY trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to TAVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ELALF trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ELALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SEGSF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SEGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while EIFZF trades at $37.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to EIFZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while BJCHY trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to BJCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JBLU trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while BJCHF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to BJCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ATSG trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AGZNF trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AGZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while NWARF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to NWARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ANZFF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to ANZFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to GRPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 999.39M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while UP trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 993.97M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ALGT trades at $54.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 987.55M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ANZLY trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ANZLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.18M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while HA trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HA's ROE of -11.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 883.73M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ULCC trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 650.33M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AIABF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIABF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to AIABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 630.51M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SNCY trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 627.54M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while HMCTF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to HMCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 593.89M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FNNNF trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to FNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 554.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CTTPY trades at $8.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to CTTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 458.29M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while VLRS trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 378.77M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CHRRF trades at $14.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CHRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.27M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to NOKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 337.72M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while GOLLQ trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 324.03M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ASLE trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 55.36. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 239.59M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FLYX trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 233.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while BLDE trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 221.69M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while BLDEW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 219.94M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while TAWNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to TAWNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 133.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while VIAAY trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to VIAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.28M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SAVE trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 103.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FLYY trades at $6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FLYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 85.96M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while MATH trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 76.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while NRSAF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to NRSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 73.01M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while AZUL trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 51.67M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SRFM trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 45.94M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CEBUY trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CEBUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 40.23M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while MESA trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MESA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 34.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JETMF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to JETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 28.63M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while HRBR trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to HRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.33M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.24M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to CAJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.11M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 7.45M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CEBUF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to CEBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SKAS has a market cap of 6.98M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SKAS trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SKAS's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKAS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to SKAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while SOAR trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ACAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while NOKPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to NOKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 713645.00. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while JETR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to JETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 14043.00. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while KLMR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is less volatile compared to KLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2862.00. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while PACC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PACC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to PACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2504.00. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while BPOL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BPOL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to BPOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 898.00. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while GLUX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GLUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to GLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122.00. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while RHWI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to RHWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ZNH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ZNH trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, CHHCF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to CHHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.

UAL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UAL stands at 25.24B. In comparison, ASLEW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UAL is priced at $77.28, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UAL currently has a P/E ratio of 7.03, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, UAL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAL is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAL.