TXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TXNM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXNM | $56.96 | -0.90% | 6.4B | 25.34 | $2.27 | +2.88% |
| NEE | $88.10 | +0.55% | 182.9B | 23.08 | $3.80 | +2.71% |
| NEE-PN | $22.06 | +0.05% | 181.6B | 23.82 | $0.92 | +2.71% |
| SO | $96.46 | +0.71% | 108.1B | 21.90 | $4.38 | +3.11% |
| DUK | $127.71 | +0.93% | 99.1B | 19.58 | $6.49 | +3.34% |
| DUK-PA | $24.41 | -0.70% | 95.4B | 3.75 | $6.53 | +3.34% |
| NGG | $83.56 | +0.88% | 83B | 18.97 | $4.40 | +3.89% |
| AEP | $138.26 | +2.45% | 74.5B | 22.61 | $6.06 | +2.76% |
| D | $69.65 | +0.55% | 61.1B | 20.21 | $3.44 | +3.84% |
| SOMN | $50.13 | -0.09% | 55.3B | 26.64 | $1.87 | +3.11% |
Stock Comparison
TXNM vs NEE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 182.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NEE trades at $88.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NEE's competition here
TXNM vs NEE-PN Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 181.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NEE-PN trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NEE-PN's competition here
TXNM vs SO Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SO trades at $96.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SO's competition here
TXNM vs DUK Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DUK trades at $127.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DUK's competition here
TXNM vs DUK-PA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DUK-PA trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DUK-PA's competition here
TXNM vs NGG Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NGG trades at $83.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NGG's competition here
TXNM vs AEP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while AEP trades at $138.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check AEP's competition here
TXNM vs D Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while D trades at $69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas D's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to D's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check D's competition here
TXNM vs SOMN Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SOMN trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SOMN's competition here
TXNM vs ETR Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ETR trades at $116.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ETR's competition here
TXNM vs XEL Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while XEL trades at $82.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check XEL's competition here
TXNM vs EXC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EXC trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EXC's competition here
TXNM vs PEG Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PEG trades at $83.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PEG's competition here
TXNM vs EXCVV Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EXCVV's competition here
TXNM vs ED Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ED trades at $111.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ED's competition here
TXNM vs PCG-PG Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG-PG trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG-PG's competition here
TXNM vs WEC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while WEC trades at $117.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check WEC's competition here
TXNM vs PCG-PB Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG-PB trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG-PB's competition here
TXNM vs PCG-PE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG-PE trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG-PE's competition here
TXNM vs ELC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ELC trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ELC's competition here
TXNM vs PCG Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG's competition here
TXNM vs PCG-PC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG-PC trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG-PC's competition here
TXNM vs PCG-PD Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG-PD trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG-PD's competition here
TXNM vs PCG-PA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG-PA trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG-PA's competition here
TXNM vs PCG-PH Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCG-PH trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCG-PH's competition here
TXNM vs PPLC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PPLC trades at $49.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PPLC's competition here
TXNM vs DTE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTE trades at $153.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTE's competition here
TXNM vs AEE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while AEE trades at $114.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check AEE's competition here
TXNM vs FTS Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while FTS trades at $57.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check FTS's competition here
TXNM vs EIX Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EIX trades at $74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EIX's competition here
TXNM vs PPL Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PPL trades at $37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PPL's competition here
TXNM vs FE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while FE trades at $48.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check FE's competition here
TXNM vs ES Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ES trades at $72.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ES's competition here
TXNM vs EBR-B Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EBR-B's competition here
TXNM vs CMS Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while CMS trades at $77.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check CMS's competition here
TXNM vs CMS-PC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while CMS-PC trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check CMS-PC's competition here
TXNM vs CMSA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while CMSA trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check CMSA's competition here
TXNM vs CMS-PB Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while CMS-PB trades at $77.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check CMS-PB's competition here
TXNM vs DTY Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTY's competition here
TXNM vs SOJD Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SOJD trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SOJD's competition here
TXNM vs EBR Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EBR trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EBR's competition here
TXNM vs SOJC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SOJC trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SOJC's competition here
TXNM vs EVRG Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EVRG trades at $87.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EVRG's competition here
TXNM vs LNT Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while LNT trades at $76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check LNT's competition here
TXNM vs SOJE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SOJE trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SOJE's competition here
TXNM vs AQNB Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while AQNB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check AQNB's competition here
TXNM vs DUKB Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DUKB trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DUKB's competition here
TXNM vs EMA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EMA trades at $53.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EMA's competition here
TXNM vs KEP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while KEP trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check KEP's competition here
TXNM vs AGR Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check AGR's competition here
TXNM vs NEE-PR Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NEE-PR's competition here
TXNM vs PNW Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PNW trades at $107.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PNW's competition here
TXNM vs OGE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while OGE trades at $49.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check OGE's competition here
TXNM vs OKLO Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while OKLO trades at $50.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -60.71. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check OKLO's competition here
TXNM vs IDA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while IDA trades at $150.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check IDA's competition here
TXNM vs CMSC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while CMSC trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check CMSC's competition here
TXNM vs CMSD Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while CMSD trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check CMSD's competition here
TXNM vs FRVO Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FRVO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while FRVO trades at $30.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas FRVO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRVO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to FRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check FRVO's competition here
TXNM vs ENIC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ENIC trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ENIC's competition here
TXNM vs POR Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while POR trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check POR's competition here
TXNM vs FRMI Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while FRMI trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check FRMI's competition here
TXNM vs DTK Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTK trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTK's competition here
TXNM vs DTJ Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTJ's competition here
TXNM vs PNM Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PNM's competition here
TXNM vs DTW Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTW trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTW's competition here
TXNM vs DTG Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTG trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTG's competition here
TXNM vs DTB Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTB trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTB's competition here
TXNM vs CEPU Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while CEPU trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check CEPU's competition here
TXNM vs ETI-P Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ETI-P trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ETI-P's competition here
TXNM vs EDN Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EDN trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EDN's competition here
TXNM vs EAI Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 945.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EAI trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EAI's competition here
TXNM vs SPKE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SPKE's competition here
TXNM vs SPKEP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SPKEP's competition here
TXNM vs GNE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while GNE trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check GNE's competition here
TXNM vs GNE-PA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check GNE-PA's competition here
TXNM vs GPJA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while GPJA trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check GPJA's competition here
TXNM vs ENO Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ENO trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ENO's competition here
TXNM vs EMP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while EMP trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check EMP's competition here
TXNM vs ENJ Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ENJ trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ENJ's competition here
TXNM vs VIASP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while VIASP trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check VIASP's competition here
TXNM vs ETI Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ETI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ETI's competition here
TXNM vs NMK Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NMK trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to NMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NMK's competition here
TXNM vs IPLDP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check IPLDP's competition here
TXNM vs NMK-PB Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NMK-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NMK-PB trades at $79.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NMK-PB's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMK-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to NMK-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NMK-PB's competition here
TXNM vs NMK-PC Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NMK-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NMK-PC trades at $76.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NMK-PC's P/E ratio is 72.61. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMK-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to NMK-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NMK-PC's competition here
TXNM vs PCGU Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check PCGU's competition here
TXNM vs ENIA Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ENIA's competition here
TXNM vs SOLN Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SOLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while SOLN trades at $56.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SOLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOLN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to SOLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check SOLN's competition here
TXNM vs NEE-PQ Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NEE-PQ's competition here
TXNM vs DTP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DTP's competition here
TXNM vs AEPPZ Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check AEPPZ's competition here
TXNM vs NEE-PP Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check NEE-PP's competition here
TXNM vs DCUE Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check DCUE's competition here
TXNM vs ALP-PQ Comparison June 2026
TXNM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXNM stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TXNM is priced at $56.96, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXNM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, TXNM's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXNM is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXNM.Check ALP-PQ's competition here