Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NEE trades at $86.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to NEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NEE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SOMN trades at $49.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SOMN's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SO trades at $92.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SO's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SOJE trades at $16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SOJE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DUK trades at $123.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DUK's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DUK-PA trades at $24.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DUK-PA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NGG trades at $81.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NGG's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while AEP trades at $125.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check AEP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while D trades at $68.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas D's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to D's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to D. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check D's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ETR trades at $107.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ETR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ELC trades at $19.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ELC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while XEL trades at $79.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to XEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check XEL's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG-PG trades at $18.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG-PG's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EXC trades at $45.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EXC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG-PE trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG-PE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG-PC trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG-PC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG-PA trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG-PA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG-PD trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG-PD's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG-PH trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG-PH's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCG-PB trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCG-PB's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EXCVV's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ED trades at $108.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ED's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PEG trades at $76.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PEG's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while WEC trades at $110.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check WEC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PPLC trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PPLC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while AEE trades at $109.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check AEE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTW trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTW's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTE trades at $140.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EIX trades at $71.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EIX's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while FE trades at $47.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check FE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ES trades at $72.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ES's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PPL trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PPL's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CNP has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CNP trades at $40.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CNP's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to CNP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CNP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EBR-B's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTY's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CMS-PB trades at $75.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CMS-PB's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CMS-PC trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CMS-PC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CMS trades at $71.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CMS's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CMSA trades at $20.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CMSA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SOJD trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SOJD's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EBR trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EBR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SOJC trades at $19.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SOJC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EVRG trades at $84.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EVRG's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while LNT trades at $70.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check LNT's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DUKB trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DUKB's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EMA trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EMA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while KEP trades at $11.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check KEP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check AGR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NEE-PR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PNW trades at $101.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PNW's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while OGE trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check OGE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while IDA trades at $142.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check IDA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CIG-C trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CIG-C's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CMSD trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CMSD's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CMSC trades at $21.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CMSC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while TXNM trades at $57.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check TXNM's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ENIC trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ENIC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while POR trades at $50.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check POR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CIG trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to CIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CIG's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTK trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTK's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTJ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTJ's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NWE trades at $71.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to NWE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NWE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PAM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PAM trades at $78.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PAM's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PAM's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while FRMI trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check FRMI's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PNM's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTG trades at $16.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTG's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTB trades at $16.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTB's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while MGEE trades at $81.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check MGEE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while HE trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to HE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check HE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while CEPU trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check CEPU's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ELPC trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ELPC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ETI-P trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ETI-P's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EDN trades at $23.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EDN's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 933.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EAI trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EAI's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NKLR has a market cap of 667.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NKLR trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NKLR's P/E ratio is -42.21. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NKLR's ROE of +69.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to NKLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NKLR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, IMSR has a market cap of 487.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while IMSR trades at $5.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas IMSR's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMSR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to IMSR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check IMSR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SPKE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SPKEP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 383.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while GNE trades at $14.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check GNE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check GNE-PA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while GPJA trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check GPJA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ENJ trades at $19.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ENJ's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ENO trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ENO's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while EMP trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check EMP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while VIASP trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check VIASP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ETI trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ETI's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while VVPR trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check VVPR's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, IMSRW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while IMSRW trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas IMSRW's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMSRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to IMSRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check IMSRW's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NEE-PP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check IPLDP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check PCGU's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check ENIA's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NMK-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NMK-PC trades at $76.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NMK-PC's P/E ratio is 72.61. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMK-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to NMK-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NMK-PC's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DCUE's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SCE-PM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while SCE-PM trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas SCE-PM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCE-PM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is more volatile compared to SCE-PM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check SCE-PM's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check NEE-PQ's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check DTP's competition here

Fortis Inc. (NYSE: FTS) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FTS stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FTS is priced at $56.68 on the NYSE, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FTS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.58, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FTS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTS is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTS.Check AEPPZ's competition here