Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNT | $76.19 | +0.79% | 19.7B | 23.66 | $3.22 | +2.74% |
| NEE | $87.70 | +0.09% | 182.9B | 23.08 | $3.80 | +2.71% |
| NEE-PN | $21.97 | -0.36% | 181.6B | 23.82 | $0.92 | +2.71% |
| SO | $95.91 | +0.14% | 108.1B | 21.90 | $4.38 | +3.11% |
| DUK | $127.11 | +0.46% | 99.1B | 19.58 | $6.49 | +3.34% |
| DUK-PA | $24.45 | -0.53% | 95.4B | 3.75 | $6.53 | +3.34% |
| NGG | $83.42 | +0.71% | 83B | 18.97 | $4.40 | +3.89% |
| AEP | $137.00 | +1.51% | 74.5B | 22.61 | $6.06 | +2.76% |
| D | $69.51 | +0.35% | 61.1B | 20.21 | $3.44 | +3.84% |
| SOMN | $49.82 | -0.70% | 55.3B | 26.64 | $1.87 | +3.11% |
Stock Comparison
LNT vs NEE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 182.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NEE trades at $87.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NEE's competition here
LNT vs NEE-PN Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 181.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NEE-PN trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NEE-PN's competition here
LNT vs SO Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SO trades at $95.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SO's competition here
LNT vs DUK Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DUK trades at $127.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DUK's competition here
LNT vs DUK-PA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DUK-PA trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DUK-PA's competition here
LNT vs NGG Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NGG trades at $83.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NGG's competition here
LNT vs AEP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while AEP trades at $137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check AEP's competition here
LNT vs D Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while D trades at $69.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas D's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to D's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check D's competition here
LNT vs SOMN Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SOMN trades at $49.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SOMN's competition here
LNT vs ETR Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ETR trades at $115.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ETR's competition here
LNT vs XEL Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while XEL trades at $81.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check XEL's competition here
LNT vs EXC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EXC trades at $46.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EXC's competition here
LNT vs PEG Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PEG trades at $82.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PEG's competition here
LNT vs EXCVV Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EXCVV's competition here
LNT vs ED Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ED trades at $110.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ED's competition here
LNT vs PCG-PG Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG-PG trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG-PG's competition here
LNT vs WEC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while WEC trades at $117.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check WEC's competition here
LNT vs PCG-PB Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG-PB trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG-PB's competition here
LNT vs PCG-PE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG-PE trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG-PE's competition here
LNT vs ELC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ELC trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ELC's competition here
LNT vs PCG Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG's competition here
LNT vs PCG-PC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG-PC trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG-PC's competition here
LNT vs PCG-PD Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG-PD trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG-PD's competition here
LNT vs PCG-PA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG-PA trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG-PA's competition here
LNT vs PCG-PH Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCG-PH trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCG-PH's competition here
LNT vs PPLC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PPLC trades at $49.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PPLC's competition here
LNT vs DTE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTE trades at $152.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTE's competition here
LNT vs AEE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while AEE trades at $114.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check AEE's competition here
LNT vs FTS Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while FTS trades at $57.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check FTS's competition here
LNT vs EIX Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EIX trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EIX's competition here
LNT vs PPL Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PPL trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PPL's competition here
LNT vs FE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while FE trades at $48.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check FE's competition here
LNT vs ES Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ES trades at $72.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ES's competition here
LNT vs EBR-B Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EBR-B's competition here
LNT vs CMS Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while CMS trades at $77.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check CMS's competition here
LNT vs CMS-PC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while CMS-PC trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check CMS-PC's competition here
LNT vs CMSA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while CMSA trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check CMSA's competition here
LNT vs CMS-PB Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while CMS-PB trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check CMS-PB's competition here
LNT vs DTY Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTY's competition here
LNT vs SOJD Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SOJD trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SOJD's competition here
LNT vs EBR Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EBR trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EBR's competition here
LNT vs SOJC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SOJC trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SOJC's competition here
LNT vs EVRG Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EVRG trades at $86.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EVRG's competition here
LNT vs SOJE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SOJE trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SOJE's competition here
LNT vs AQNB Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while AQNB trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check AQNB's competition here
LNT vs DUKB Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DUKB trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DUKB's competition here
LNT vs EMA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EMA trades at $53.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EMA's competition here
LNT vs KEP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while KEP trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check KEP's competition here
LNT vs AGR Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check AGR's competition here
LNT vs NEE-PR Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NEE-PR's competition here
LNT vs PNW Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PNW trades at $107.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PNW's competition here
LNT vs OGE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while OGE trades at $48.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check OGE's competition here
LNT vs OKLO Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while OKLO trades at $51.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -60.71. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check OKLO's competition here
LNT vs IDA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while IDA trades at $149.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check IDA's competition here
LNT vs CMSC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while CMSC trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check CMSC's competition here
LNT vs CMSD Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while CMSD trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check CMSD's competition here
LNT vs FRVO Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, FRVO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while FRVO trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas FRVO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRVO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to FRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check FRVO's competition here
LNT vs TXNM Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while TXNM trades at $57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check TXNM's competition here
LNT vs ENIC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ENIC trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ENIC's competition here
LNT vs POR Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while POR trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check POR's competition here
LNT vs FRMI Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while FRMI trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check FRMI's competition here
LNT vs DTK Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTK trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTK's competition here
LNT vs DTJ Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTJ's competition here
LNT vs PNM Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PNM's competition here
LNT vs DTW Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTW trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTW's competition here
LNT vs DTG Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTG trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTG's competition here
LNT vs DTB Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTB trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTB's competition here
LNT vs CEPU Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while CEPU trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check CEPU's competition here
LNT vs ETI-P Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ETI-P trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ETI-P's competition here
LNT vs EDN Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EDN trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EDN's competition here
LNT vs EAI Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 945.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EAI trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EAI's competition here
LNT vs SPKE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SPKE's competition here
LNT vs SPKEP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SPKEP's competition here
LNT vs GNE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while GNE trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check GNE's competition here
LNT vs GNE-PA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check GNE-PA's competition here
LNT vs GPJA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while GPJA trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check GPJA's competition here
LNT vs ENO Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ENO trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ENO's competition here
LNT vs EMP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while EMP trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check EMP's competition here
LNT vs ENJ Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ENJ trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ENJ's competition here
LNT vs VIASP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while VIASP trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check VIASP's competition here
LNT vs ETI Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ETI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ETI's competition here
LNT vs NMK Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NMK trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to NMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NMK's competition here
LNT vs IPLDP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check IPLDP's competition here
LNT vs NMK-PB Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NMK-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NMK-PB trades at $79.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NMK-PB's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMK-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to NMK-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NMK-PB's competition here
LNT vs NMK-PC Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NMK-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NMK-PC trades at $76.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NMK-PC's P/E ratio is 72.61. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMK-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to NMK-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NMK-PC's competition here
LNT vs PCGU Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check PCGU's competition here
LNT vs ENIA Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ENIA's competition here
LNT vs SOLN Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SOLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while SOLN trades at $56.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas SOLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOLN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to SOLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check SOLN's competition here
LNT vs NEE-PQ Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NEE-PQ's competition here
LNT vs DTP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DTP's competition here
LNT vs AEPPZ Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check AEPPZ's competition here
LNT vs NEE-PP Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check NEE-PP's competition here
LNT vs DCUE Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check DCUE's competition here
LNT vs ALP-PQ Comparison June 2026
LNT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNT stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNT is priced at $76.19, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.66, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, LNT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNT is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNT.Check ALP-PQ's competition here