Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 160.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NEE-PN trades at $19.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE-PN's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NEE trades at $76.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SOJE trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOJE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SOMN trades at $45.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOMN's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SO trades at $83.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SO's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DUK trades at $114.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DUK's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DUK-PA trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DUK-PA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NGG trades at $76.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NGG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while AEP trades at $119.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check AEP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while D trades at $61.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas D's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to D's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to D. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check D's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ELC trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ELC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ELC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ETR trades at $100.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ETR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while XEL trades at $71.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to XEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check XEL's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PC trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PE trades at $17.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PA trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PH trades at $15.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PH's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PD trades at $16.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PD's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EXC trades at $40.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EXC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EXCVV's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PG trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PB trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG-PI trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PI's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ED trades at $103.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ED's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DUKU has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DUKU trades at $48.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DUKU's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUKU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DUKU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DUKU's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PEG trades at $68.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PEG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PPLC trades at $44.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PPLC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while WEC trades at $101.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check WEC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCG trades at $12.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while AEE trades at $99.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check AEE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTW trades at $18.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTW's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while FTS trades at $52.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check FTS's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTE trades at $124.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while FE trades at $43.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check FE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CNP has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CNP trades at $37.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CNP's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CNP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EBR-B's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PPL trades at $32.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PPL's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ES trades at $64.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ES's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CMS-PB trades at $76.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMS-PB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTY's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CMS-PC trades at $16.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMS-PC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CMSA trades at $19.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMSA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EIX trades at $53.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EIX's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EBR trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EBR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SOJD trades at $17.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOJD's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CMS trades at $63.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMS's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SOJC trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOJC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EVRG trades at $79.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EVRG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while LNT trades at $64.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check LNT's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DUKB trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DUKB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EMA trades at $48.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EMA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check AGR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE-PR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, XELLL has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while XELLL trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas XELLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XELLL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to XELLL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check XELLL's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PNW trades at $95.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PNW's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while OGE trades at $45.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check OGE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CIG-C trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CIG-C's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while IDA trades at $132.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IDA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while TXNM trades at $58.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check TXNM's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CMSD trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMSD's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CMSC trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMSC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CIG trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CIG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ENIC trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ENIC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while POR trades at $44.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check POR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTJ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTJ's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTK trades at $20.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTK's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NWE trades at $69.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NWE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NWE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PAM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PAM trades at $76.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PAM's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PAM's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PNM's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTG trades at $15.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTB trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DTB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while MGEE trades at $70.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check MGEE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ELPC trades at $12.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ELPC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while CEPU trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CEPU's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while HE trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to HE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check HE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ETI-P trades at $21.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ETI-P's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 883.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EAI trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EAI's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 872.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EDN trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EDN's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SOJF has a market cap of 522.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SOJF trades at $23.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SOJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to SOJF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOJF's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 433.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while GNE trades at $16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check GNE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SPKE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SPKEP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NKLR has a market cap of 387.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NKLR trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NKLR's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NKLR's ROE of -6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NKLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NKLR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, IMSR has a market cap of 312.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while IMSR trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas IMSR's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMSR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to IMSR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IMSR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check GNE-PA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 178.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while GPJA trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check GPJA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 162.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while EMP trades at $18.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EMP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while VIASP trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check VIASP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while ETI trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ETI's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while VIVO trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIVO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check VIVO's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while VVPR trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check VVPR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, IMSRW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while IMSRW trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas IMSRW's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMSRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to IMSRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IMSRW's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, SOLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while SOLN trades at $56.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas SOLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOLN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to SOLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOLN's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NMK-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NMK-PB trades at $79.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NMK-PB's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMK-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NMK-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NMK-PB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IPLDP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCGU's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE-PQ's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 14.2B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.08 on the NYSE, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 4.76, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DCUE's competition here