Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NEE trades at $86.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while SOMN trades at $49.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOMN's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while SO trades at $92.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SO's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while SOJE trades at $16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOJE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DUK trades at $123.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DUK's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DUK-PA trades at $24.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DUK-PA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NGG trades at $81.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NGG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while AEP trades at $125.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check AEP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while D trades at $68.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas D's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to D's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to D. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check D's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ETR trades at $107.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ETR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ELC trades at $19.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ELC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while XEL trades at $79.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to XEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check XEL's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG-PG trades at $18.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EXC trades at $45.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EXC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG-PE trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG-PC trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG-PA trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG-PD trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PD's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG-PH trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PH's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCG-PB trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCG-PB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EXCVV's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ED trades at $108.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ED's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PEG trades at $76.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PEG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while WEC trades at $110.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check WEC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PPLC trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PPLC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while AEE trades at $109.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check AEE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTW trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTW's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTE trades at $140.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while FTS trades at $56.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check FTS's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EIX trades at $71.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EIX's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while FE trades at $47.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check FE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ES trades at $72.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ES's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PPL trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PPL's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CNP has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CNP trades at $40.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CNP's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CNP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EBR-B's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTY's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CMS-PB trades at $75.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMS-PB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CMS-PC trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMS-PC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CMS trades at $71.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMS's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CMSA trades at $20.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMSA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while SOJD trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOJD's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EBR trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EBR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while SOJC trades at $19.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SOJC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EVRG trades at $84.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EVRG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while LNT trades at $70.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check LNT's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DUKB trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DUKB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EMA trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EMA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check AGR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE-PR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PNW trades at $101.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PNW's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while OGE trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check OGE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while IDA trades at $142.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IDA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CIG-C trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CIG-C's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CMSD trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMSD's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CMSC trades at $21.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CMSC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while TXNM trades at $57.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check TXNM's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ENIC trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ENIC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while POR trades at $50.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check POR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CIG trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CIG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTK trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTK's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTJ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTJ's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NWE trades at $71.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NWE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NWE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PAM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PAM trades at $78.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PAM's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PAM's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while FRMI trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check FRMI's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PNM's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTG trades at $16.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTG's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTB trades at $16.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while MGEE trades at $81.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check MGEE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while HE trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to HE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check HE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while CEPU trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check CEPU's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ELPC trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ELPC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ETI-P trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ETI-P's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EDN trades at $23.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EDN's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 933.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EAI trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EAI's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NKLR has a market cap of 667.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NKLR trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NKLR's P/E ratio is -42.21. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NKLR's ROE of +69.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NKLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NKLR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, IMSR has a market cap of 487.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while IMSR trades at $5.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas IMSR's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMSR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to IMSR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IMSR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SPKE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check SPKEP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 383.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while GNE trades at $14.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check GNE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check GNE-PA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while GPJA trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check GPJA's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ENJ trades at $19.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ENJ's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ENO trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ENO's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while EMP trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check EMP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while VIASP trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check VIASP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ETI trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ETI's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, VVPR has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while VVPR trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas VVPR's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVPR's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to VVPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check VVPR's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, IMSRW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while IMSRW trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas IMSRW's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMSRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to IMSRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IMSRW's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NMK-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NMK-PC trades at $76.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NMK-PC's P/E ratio is 72.61. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NMK-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NMK-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NMK-PC's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NMK-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NMK-PB trades at $79.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NMK-PB's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NMK-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NMK-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NMK-PB's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check AEPPZ's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE-PP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check NEE-PQ's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DCUE's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check DTP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check IPLDP's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check PCGU's competition here

Korea Electric Power Corporation (NYSE: KEP) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KEP stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEP is priced at $11.77 on the NYSE, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KEP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.46, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, KEP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEP is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEP.Check ENIA's competition here