Consolidated Edison, Inc.

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 198.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NEE trades at $95.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SO trades at $93.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SO's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DUK trades at $127.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DUK's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DUK-PA trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DUK-PA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NGG trades at $87.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NGG's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while AEP trades at $134.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AEP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SOMN trades at $50.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOMN's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while D trades at $62.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas D's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to D's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check D's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ETR trades at $113.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ETR's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while XEL trades at $79.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check XEL's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NEE-PN trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PN's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EXC trades at $46.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EXC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EXCVV's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PEG trades at $80.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PEG's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ELC trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ELC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PPLC trades at $51.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PPLC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while WEC trades at $114.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check WEC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG trades at $16.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while AEE trades at $111.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AEE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTE trades at $146.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PPL trades at $38.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PPL's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while FE trades at $49.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check FE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while FTS trades at $56.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check FTS's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CNP has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CNP trades at $42.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CNP's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to CNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CNP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EIX trades at $68.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EIX's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ES trades at $68.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ES's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EBR-B's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CMS trades at $76.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMS's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SOJD trades at $20.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOJD's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTY's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SOJC trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOJC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EBR trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EBR's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while KEP trades at $15.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check KEP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SOJE trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOJE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while AQNB trades at $25.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AQNB's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DUKB trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DUKB's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EVRG trades at $81.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EVRG's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while LNT trades at $72.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check LNT's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EMA trades at $52.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EMA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SREA trades at $21.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SREA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AGR's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PR's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PNW trades at $102.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PNW's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while OKLO trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -98.61. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check OKLO's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while OGE trades at $47.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check OGE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while IDA trades at $146.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check IDA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CMSD trades at $23.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMSD's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CMSC trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMSC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CMS-PB trades at $79.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMS-PB's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while TXNM trades at $59.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check TXNM's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ENIC trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENIC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CMSA trades at $22.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMSA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG-PA trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while POR trades at $50.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check POR's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG-PB trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PB's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CMS-PC trades at $17.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMS-PC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTK trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTK's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG-PD trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PD's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG-PC trades at $18.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG-PE trades at $18.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG-PG trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PG's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTJ's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCG-PH trades at $16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PH's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTW trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTW's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PNM's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTG trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTG's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTB trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTB's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while FRMI trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check FRMI's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CEPU trades at $14.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CEPU's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ETI-P trades at $24.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ETI-P's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EDN trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EDN's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 980M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EAI trades at $20.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EAI's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SPKE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SPKEP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 369.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while GNE trades at $13.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 47.72. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check GNE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check GNE-PA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while GPJA trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check GPJA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ENO trades at $22.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENO's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while EMP trades at $21.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EMP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ENJ trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENJ's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while VIASP trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check VIASP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ETI trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ETI's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PQ's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NMK-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NMK-PB trades at $79.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NMK-PB's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMK-PB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NMK-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NMK-PB's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DCUE's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SOLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while SOLN trades at $56.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SOLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOLN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to SOLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOLN's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENIA's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AEPPZ's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCGU's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NMK-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NMK-PC trades at $76.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NMK-PC's P/E ratio is 72.61. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMK-PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NMK-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NMK-PC's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check IPLDP's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ALP-PQ's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while NMK trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NMK's competition here

ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $109.06, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CNP-PB's competition here