Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ED) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED | $107.06 | +0.01% | 39.2B | 17.94 | $5.93 | +3.27% |
| NEE | $87.13 | +1.63% | 180.9B | 22.02 | $3.94 | +2.74% |
| NEE-PN | $22.60 | -0.18% | 180.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.74% |
| SO | $93.43 | +0.97% | 104.9B | 23.81 | $3.91 | +3.20% |
| DUK-PA | $24.80 | +0.00% | 96.7B | 5.21 | $4.76 | +3.44% |
| DUK | $123.91 | +0.15% | 96.6B | 19.06 | $6.50 | +3.44% |
| NGG | $80.63 | -0.06% | 79.1B | 18.05 | $4.40 | +4.08% |
| AEP | $129.00 | +0.57% | 69.5B | 18.89 | $6.76 | +2.96% |
| D | $68.95 | +1.36% | 60.2B | 20.18 | $3.39 | +3.90% |
| SOMN | $48.92 | +0.20% | 54.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.20% |
Stock Comparison
ED vs NEE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NEE trades at $87.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE's competition here
ED vs NEE-PN Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NEE-PN trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PN's competition here
ED vs SO Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SO trades at $93.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SO's competition here
ED vs DUK-PA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DUK-PA trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DUK-PA's competition here
ED vs DUK Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DUK trades at $123.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DUK's competition here
ED vs NGG Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NGG trades at $80.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NGG's competition here
ED vs AEP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while AEP trades at $129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AEP's competition here
ED vs D Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while D trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas D's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to D's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check D's competition here
ED vs SOMN Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SOMN trades at $48.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOMN's competition here
ED vs ETR Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ETR trades at $112.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ETR's competition here
ED vs XEL Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while XEL trades at $78.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check XEL's competition here
ED vs EXC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EXC trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EXC's competition here
ED vs EXCVV Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EXCVV's competition here
ED vs PEG Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PEG trades at $80.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PEG's competition here
ED vs ELC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ELC trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ELC's competition here
ED vs PCG-PD Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG-PD trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PD's competition here
ED vs PCG-PG Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG-PG trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PG's competition here
ED vs WEC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while WEC trades at $113.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check WEC's competition here
ED vs PCG-PC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG-PC trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PC's competition here
ED vs PCG-PH Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG-PH trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PH's competition here
ED vs PCG-PA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG-PA trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PA's competition here
ED vs PCG Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG's competition here
ED vs PCG-PE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG-PE trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PE's competition here
ED vs PCG-PB Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCG-PB trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCG-PB's competition here
ED vs PPLC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PPLC has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PPLC trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PPLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPLC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PPLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PPLC's competition here
ED vs DTE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTE trades at $147.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTE's competition here
ED vs AEE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while AEE trades at $109.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AEE's competition here
ED vs FTS Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while FTS trades at $55.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check FTS's competition here
ED vs EIX Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EIX trades at $71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EIX's competition here
ED vs FE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while FE trades at $46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check FE's competition here
ED vs PPL Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PPL trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PPL's competition here
ED vs ES Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ES trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ES's competition here
ED vs EBR-B Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EBR-B's competition here
ED vs CMS-PB Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while CMS-PB trades at $77.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMS-PB's competition here
ED vs CMS-PC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while CMS-PC trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMS-PC's competition here
ED vs CMSA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while CMSA trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMSA's competition here
ED vs CMS Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while CMS trades at $74.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMS's competition here
ED vs DTY Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTY's competition here
ED vs SOJD Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SOJD trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOJD's competition here
ED vs SOJC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SOJC trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOJC's competition here
ED vs EBR Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EBR trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EBR's competition here
ED vs EVRG Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EVRG trades at $83.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EVRG's competition here
ED vs SOJE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SOJE trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOJE's competition here
ED vs LNT Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while LNT trades at $73.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check LNT's competition here
ED vs AQNB Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while AQNB trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AQNB's competition here
ED vs DUKB Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DUKB trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DUKB's competition here
ED vs KEP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while KEP trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check KEP's competition here
ED vs EMA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EMA trades at $51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EMA's competition here
ED vs AGR Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AGR's competition here
ED vs NEE-PR Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PR's competition here
ED vs PNW Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PNW trades at $102.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PNW's competition here
ED vs OKLO Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while OKLO trades at $59.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -72.82. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check OKLO's competition here
ED vs OGE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while OGE trades at $47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check OGE's competition here
ED vs IDA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while IDA trades at $143.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check IDA's competition here
ED vs FRVO Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FRVO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while FRVO trades at $40.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas FRVO's P/E ratio is -175.45. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRVO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to FRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check FRVO's competition here
ED vs CMSC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while CMSC trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMSC's competition here
ED vs CMSD Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while CMSD trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CMSD's competition here
ED vs ENIC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ENIC trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENIC's competition here
ED vs TXNM Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while TXNM trades at $57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check TXNM's competition here
ED vs FRMI Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while FRMI trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check FRMI's competition here
ED vs POR Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while POR trades at $50.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check POR's competition here
ED vs DTK Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTK trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTK's competition here
ED vs DTJ Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTJ's competition here
ED vs DTW Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTW trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTW's competition here
ED vs PNM Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PNM's competition here
ED vs DTB Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTB trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTB's competition here
ED vs DTG Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTG trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTG's competition here
ED vs CEPU Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while CEPU trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check CEPU's competition here
ED vs EDN Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EDN trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EDN's competition here
ED vs ETI-P Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ETI-P trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ETI-P's competition here
ED vs EAI Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 943.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EAI trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EAI's competition here
ED vs SPKE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SPKE's competition here
ED vs SPKEP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SPKEP's competition here
ED vs GNE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 369.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while GNE trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check GNE's competition here
ED vs GNE-PA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check GNE-PA's competition here
ED vs GPJA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while GPJA trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check GPJA's competition here
ED vs ENO Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ENO trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENO's competition here
ED vs EMP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while EMP trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check EMP's competition here
ED vs ENJ Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ENJ trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENJ's competition here
ED vs VIASP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while VIASP trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check VIASP's competition here
ED vs ETI Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ETI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ETI's competition here
ED vs NMK Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NMK trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NMK's competition here
ED vs IPLDP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check IPLDP's competition here
ED vs NMK-PB Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NMK-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NMK-PB trades at $79.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NMK-PB's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMK-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NMK-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NMK-PB's competition here
ED vs NMK-PC Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NMK-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NMK-PC trades at $76.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NMK-PC's P/E ratio is 72.61. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMK-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NMK-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NMK-PC's competition here
ED vs PCGU Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check PCGU's competition here
ED vs ENIA Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ENIA's competition here
ED vs SOLN Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SOLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while SOLN trades at $56.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas SOLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOLN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to SOLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check SOLN's competition here
ED vs NEE-PQ Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PQ's competition here
ED vs DTP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DTP's competition here
ED vs AEPPZ Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check AEPPZ's competition here
ED vs NEE-PP Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check NEE-PP's competition here
ED vs DCUE Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check DCUE's competition here
ED vs ALP-PQ Comparison June 2026
ED plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ED stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ED is priced at $107.06, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ED currently has a P/E ratio of 17.94, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, ED's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ED is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ED.Check ALP-PQ's competition here