Titan America S.A.
Titan America S.A. (TTAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | $16.06 | -4.35% | 3B | 15.91 | $1.01 | +0.99% |
| CRH | $110.80 | -4.03% | 74.1B | 20.56 | $5.39 | +1.36% |
| VMC | $287.72 | -3.23% | 37.3B | 34.09 | $8.44 | +0.69% |
| MLM | $603.29 | -1.82% | 36.4B | 37.77 | $15.98 | +0.54% |
| AMRZ | $50.91 | -4.63% | 28.1B | 25.08 | $2.03 | +0.87% |
| CX | $11.89 | -2.94% | 17.2B | -169.64 | -$0.07 | +0.76% |
| JHX | $19.88 | -4.01% | 11.5B | 82.83 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $204.78 | -2.87% | 6.4B | 15.47 | $13.24 | +0.49% |
| KNF | $90.30 | -2.88% | 5.1B | 32.73 | $2.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TTAM vs CRH Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while CRH trades at $110.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CRH's competition here
TTAM vs VMC Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while VMC trades at $287.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check VMC's competition here
TTAM vs MLM Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while MLM trades at $603.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 37.77. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check MLM's competition here
TTAM vs AMRZ Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while AMRZ trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check AMRZ's competition here
TTAM vs CX Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while CX trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas CX's P/E ratio is -169.64. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CX's competition here
TTAM vs JHX Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while JHX trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check JHX's competition here
TTAM vs SUM Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check SUM's competition here
TTAM vs EXP Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while EXP trades at $204.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check EXP's competition here
TTAM vs KNF Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while KNF trades at $90.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check KNF's competition here
TTAM vs USLM Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while USLM trades at $106.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check USLM's competition here
TTAM vs BCC Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while BCC trades at $74.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check BCC's competition here
TTAM vs TGLS Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while TGLS trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check TGLS's competition here
TTAM vs LOMA Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while LOMA trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 74.64. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check LOMA's competition here
TTAM vs CPAC Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 900.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while CPAC trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CPAC's competition here
TTAM vs SMID Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while SMID trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check SMID's competition here
TTAM vs FEAM Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while FEAM trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check FEAM's competition here
TTAM vs CAPS Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while CAPS trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CAPS's competition here
TTAM vs RETO Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 356K. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while RETO trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check RETO's competition here
TTAM vs USCR Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 3B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $16.06, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check USCR's competition here