Titan America S.A.
Titan America S.A. (TTAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | $15.18 | -1.30% | 2.8B | 15.18 | $1.00 | +1.05% |
| CRH | $100.37 | -0.65% | 67.1B | 18.62 | $5.39 | +1.51% |
| VMC | $260.65 | -0.35% | 33.8B | 30.85 | $8.45 | +0.77% |
| MLM | $536.48 | -0.28% | 32.2B | 33.68 | $15.93 | +0.61% |
| AMRZ | $49.95 | -1.07% | 27.6B | 23.90 | $2.09 | +1.10% |
| CX | $12.56 | -0.24% | 18.2B | -179.43 | -$0.07 | +0.71% |
| JHX | $20.76 | -0.24% | 12B | 109.26 | $0.19 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $199.43 | +0.15% | 6.2B | 15.15 | $13.16 | +0.50% |
| KNF | $72.20 | -1.97% | 4.1B | 28.09 | $2.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TTAM vs CRH Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while CRH trades at $100.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CRH's competition here
TTAM vs VMC Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while VMC trades at $260.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check VMC's competition here
TTAM vs MLM Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while MLM trades at $536.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check MLM's competition here
TTAM vs AMRZ Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while AMRZ trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check AMRZ's competition here
TTAM vs CX Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while CX trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CX's P/E ratio is -179.43. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CX's competition here
TTAM vs JHX Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while JHX trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 109.26. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check JHX's competition here
TTAM vs SUM Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check SUM's competition here
TTAM vs EXP Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while EXP trades at $199.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check EXP's competition here
TTAM vs KNF Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while KNF trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check KNF's competition here
TTAM vs USLM Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while USLM trades at $106.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check USLM's competition here
TTAM vs BCC Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while BCC trades at $67.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check BCC's competition here
TTAM vs TGLS Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while TGLS trades at $41.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check TGLS's competition here
TTAM vs LOMA Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while LOMA trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 49.77. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check LOMA's competition here
TTAM vs CPAC Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 921.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while CPAC trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CPAC's competition here
TTAM vs SMID Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while SMID trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check SMID's competition here
TTAM vs CAPS Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while CAPS trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check CAPS's competition here
TTAM vs RETO Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 374.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while RETO trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check RETO's competition here
TTAM vs USCR Comparison May 2026
TTAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAM stands at 2.8B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTAM is priced at $15.18, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, TTAM's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAM is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAM.Check USCR's competition here