Eagle Materials Inc.
Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EXP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXP | $205.45 | -2.22% | 6.6B | 15.94 | $13.23 | +0.47% |
| CRH | $110.94 | -6.32% | 77.1B | 21.42 | $5.39 | +1.29% |
| VMC | $288.22 | -4.48% | 38.6B | 35.18 | $8.45 | +0.67% |
| MLM | $603.13 | -2.57% | 37.1B | 38.52 | $15.97 | +0.53% |
| AMRZ | $51.10 | -4.99% | 29.5B | 24.94 | $2.14 | +0.83% |
| CX | $11.85 | -3.70% | 17.8B | -175.14 | -$0.07 | +0.73% |
| JHX | $19.96 | -4.93% | 12B | 86.29 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| KNF | $89.97 | -2.79% | 5.3B | 33.68 | $2.76 | N/A |
| USLM | $106.63 | -0.97% | 3.2B | 24.23 | $4.54 | +0.22% |
Stock Comparison
EXP vs CRH Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while CRH trades at $110.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CRH's competition here
EXP vs VMC Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while VMC trades at $288.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check VMC's competition here
EXP vs MLM Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while MLM trades at $603.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check MLM's competition here
EXP vs AMRZ Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while AMRZ trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check AMRZ's competition here
EXP vs CX Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while CX trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas CX's P/E ratio is -175.14. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CX's competition here
EXP vs JHX Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while JHX trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 86.29. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check JHX's competition here
EXP vs SUM Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check SUM's competition here
EXP vs KNF Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while KNF trades at $89.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check KNF's competition here
EXP vs USLM Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while USLM trades at $106.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check USLM's competition here
EXP vs TTAM Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while TTAM trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check TTAM's competition here
EXP vs BCC Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while BCC trades at $75.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check BCC's competition here
EXP vs TGLS Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while TGLS trades at $41.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check TGLS's competition here
EXP vs LOMA Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while LOMA trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 75.61. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check LOMA's competition here
EXP vs CPAC Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 912.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while CPAC trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CPAC's competition here
EXP vs SMID Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while SMID trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check SMID's competition here
EXP vs FEAM Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while FEAM trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check FEAM's competition here
EXP vs CAPS Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while CAPS trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CAPS's competition here
EXP vs RETO Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 368.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while RETO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check RETO's competition here
EXP vs USCR Comparison May 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6.6B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $205.45, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 15.94, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check USCR's competition here