Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SSD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSD | $182.00 | +1.89% | 7.5B | 21.37 | $8.52 | +0.64% |
| TT | $460.42 | -1.32% | 101.8B | 35.12 | $13.11 | +0.84% |
| LII | $501.41 | +0.28% | 17.5B | 22.29 | $22.50 | +1.04% |
| CSL | $333.57 | +0.83% | 13.5B | 19.46 | $17.14 | +1.32% |
| AAON | $133.94 | -1.14% | 11B | 94.32 | $1.42 | +0.30% |
| WMS | $135.28 | -0.27% | 10.5B | 22.50 | $6.01 | +0.53% |
| OC | $112.20 | -1.65% | 9B | -23.73 | -$4.73 | +2.63% |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
| BECN | $124.17 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 25.39 | $4.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SSD vs TT Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while TT trades at $460.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check TT's competition here
SSD vs LII Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while LII trades at $501.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check LII's competition here
SSD vs CSL Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while CSL trades at $333.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check CSL's competition here
SSD vs AAON Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while AAON trades at $133.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 94.32. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AAON's competition here
SSD vs WMS Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while WMS trades at $135.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check WMS's competition here
SSD vs OC Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while OC trades at $112.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -23.73. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check OC's competition here
SSD vs FBHS Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check FBHS's competition here
SSD vs AZEK Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AZEK's competition here
SSD vs BECN Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check BECN's competition here
SSD vs BLDR Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while BLDR trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check BLDR's competition here
SSD vs AWI Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while AWI trades at $157.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AWI's competition here
SSD vs GMS Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check GMS's competition here
SSD vs FBIN Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while FBIN trades at $33.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check FBIN's competition here
SSD vs TREX Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while TREX trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check TREX's competition here
SSD vs DOOR Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check DOOR's competition here
SSD vs PGTI Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check PGTI's competition here
SSD vs ROCK Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while ROCK trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check ROCK's competition here
SSD vs NX Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 774.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while NX trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check NX's competition here
SSD vs APOG Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 730.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while APOG trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check APOG's competition here
SSD vs JBI Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 664.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while JBI trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check JBI's competition here
SSD vs SWIM Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 568.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while SWIM trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 69.14. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check SWIM's competition here
SSD vs ASPN Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 441.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while ASPN trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check ASPN's competition here
SSD vs BXC Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while BXC trades at $52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -107.84. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check BXC's competition here
SSD vs PHOE Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while PHOE trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 416.67. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check PHOE's competition here
SSD vs PPIH Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while PPIH trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check PPIH's competition here
SSD vs JELD Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while JELD trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check JELD's competition here
SSD vs APT Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while APT trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check APT's competition here
SSD vs CSTE Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while CSTE trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check CSTE's competition here
SSD vs SMJF Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while SMJF trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 117.33. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check SMJF's competition here
SSD vs ILAG Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while ILAG trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check ILAG's competition here
SSD vs AEHL Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while AEHL trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AEHL's competition here
SSD vs VIEW Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check VIEW's competition here
SSD vs VIEWW Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check VIEWW's competition here
SSD vs FRTA Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check FRTA's competition here
SSD vs LAYN Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check LAYN's competition here
SSD vs AFI Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AFI's competition here
SSD vs HW Comparison May 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $182.00, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check HW's competition here