Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SSD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSD | $181.57 | -2.03% | 7.5B | 22.01 | $8.25 | +0.64% |
| TT | $486.42 | +0.18% | 107.7B | 37.02 | $13.14 | +0.79% |
| JCI | $141.92 | +0.13% | 86.9B | 47.62 | $2.98 | +1.10% |
| CARR | $60.97 | -0.93% | 51B | 36.07 | $1.69 | +1.50% |
| LII | $490.97 | -0.55% | 17.1B | 21.54 | $22.80 | +1.06% |
| MAS | $74.18 | -1.62% | 15B | 18.37 | $4.04 | +1.68% |
| CSL | $360.07 | -1.00% | 14.7B | 20.97 | $17.17 | +1.19% |
| WMS | $151.98 | -0.68% | 11.8B | 25.29 | $6.01 | +0.48% |
| OC | $125.61 | -0.04% | 10.1B | -56.10 | -$2.24 | +2.35% |
| BLDR | $90.04 | -0.11% | 10B | 23.15 | $3.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SSD vs TT Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while TT trades at $486.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check TT's competition here
SSD vs JCI Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 86.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while JCI trades at $141.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 47.62. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check JCI's competition here
SSD vs CARR Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while CARR trades at $60.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check CARR's competition here
SSD vs LII Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while LII trades at $490.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check LII's competition here
SSD vs MAS Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while MAS trades at $74.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check MAS's competition here
SSD vs CSL Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while CSL trades at $360.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check CSL's competition here
SSD vs WMS Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while WMS trades at $151.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check WMS's competition here
SSD vs OC Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while OC trades at $125.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -56.10. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check OC's competition here
SSD vs BLDR Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while BLDR trades at $90.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check BLDR's competition here
SSD vs AAON Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while AAON trades at $99.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 77.20. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AAON's competition here
SSD vs FBHS Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check FBHS's competition here
SSD vs AZEK Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AZEK's competition here
SSD vs BECN Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check BECN's competition here
SSD vs AWI Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while AWI trades at $178.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AWI's competition here
SSD vs FBIN Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while FBIN trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check FBIN's competition here
SSD vs TREX Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while TREX trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check TREX's competition here
SSD vs GMS Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check GMS's competition here
SSD vs DOOR Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check DOOR's competition here
SSD vs PGTI Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check PGTI's competition here
SSD vs ROCK Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while ROCK trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check ROCK's competition here
SSD vs NX Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 939M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while NX trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check NX's competition here
SSD vs APOG Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 821.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while APOG trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check APOG's competition here
SSD vs JBI Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 754.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while JBI trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check JBI's competition here
SSD vs SWIM Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 702.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while SWIM trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 66.78. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check SWIM's competition here
SSD vs BXC Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 460.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while BXC trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 2925.50. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check BXC's competition here
SSD vs PHOE Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 349.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while PHOE trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 540.00. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check PHOE's competition here
SSD vs ASPN Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 289.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while ASPN trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check ASPN's competition here
SSD vs PPIH Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while PPIH trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check PPIH's competition here
SSD vs JELD Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while JELD trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check JELD's competition here
SSD vs CSTE Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while CSTE trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check CSTE's competition here
SSD vs SMJF Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while SMJF trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 107.67. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check SMJF's competition here
SSD vs APT Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while APT trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check APT's competition here
SSD vs AIRJW Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while AIRJW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AIRJW's competition here
SSD vs ILAG Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while ILAG trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check ILAG's competition here
SSD vs VIEW Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check VIEW's competition here
SSD vs AEHL Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 294.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while AEHL trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AEHL's competition here
SSD vs VIEWW Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check VIEWW's competition here
SSD vs HW Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check HW's competition here
SSD vs LAYN Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check LAYN's competition here
SSD vs FRTA Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check FRTA's competition here
SSD vs AFI Comparison April 2026
SSD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSD stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSD is priced at $181.57, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSD currently has a P/E ratio of 22.01, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SSD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSD is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSD.Check AFI's competition here