Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAC | $11.95 | +0.67% | 1.1B | 20.48 | $0.62 | +4.79% |
| CRH | $111.84 | +2.22% | 74.3B | 20.64 | $5.39 | +1.37% |
| VMC | $304.45 | +3.27% | 39.3B | 35.84 | $8.45 | +0.67% |
| MLM | $614.83 | +4.02% | 36.6B | 38.17 | $15.96 | +0.55% |
| AMRZ | $53.42 | -1.51% | 30.6B | 26.48 | $2.09 | +0.99% |
| CX | $12.57 | -0.24% | 18.5B | 36.37 | $0.35 | +0.77% |
| JHX | $24.24 | -1.42% | 14.4B | 130.89 | $0.19 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $225.15 | +5.59% | 6.9B | 17.08 | $13.15 | +0.45% |
| KNF | $87.43 | +4.76% | 4.9B | 33.56 | $2.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CPAC vs CRH Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while CRH trades at $111.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CRH's competition here
CPAC vs VMC Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while VMC trades at $304.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check VMC's competition here
CPAC vs MLM Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while MLM trades at $614.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check MLM's competition here
CPAC vs AMRZ Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while AMRZ trades at $53.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check AMRZ's competition here
CPAC vs CX Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while CX trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CX's competition here
CPAC vs JHX Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while JHX trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 130.89. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check JHX's competition here
CPAC vs SUM Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SUM's competition here
CPAC vs EXP Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while EXP trades at $225.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check EXP's competition here
CPAC vs KNF Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while KNF trades at $87.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check KNF's competition here
CPAC vs TTAM Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while TTAM trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TTAM's competition here
CPAC vs USLM Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while USLM trades at $110.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USLM's competition here
CPAC vs BCC Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while BCC trades at $74.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check BCC's competition here
CPAC vs TGLS Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while TGLS trades at $46.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TGLS's competition here
CPAC vs LOMA Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while LOMA trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check LOMA's competition here
CPAC vs SMID Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while SMID trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SMID's competition here
CPAC vs CAPS Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while CAPS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CAPS's competition here
CPAC vs RETO Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 387.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while RETO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check RETO's competition here
CPAC vs USCR Comparison June 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 1.1B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $11.95, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.48, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USCR's competition here