Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAC | $10.51 | -0.38% | 913.5M | 17.63 | $0.60 | +5.72% |
| CRH | $112.50 | +1.53% | 75.2B | 20.87 | $5.39 | +1.36% |
| VMC | $291.51 | +1.32% | 37.8B | 34.54 | $8.44 | +0.69% |
| MLM | $606.10 | +0.47% | 36.6B | 37.93 | $15.98 | +0.54% |
| AMRZ | $53.37 | +4.83% | 29.5B | 26.28 | $2.03 | +0.87% |
| CX | $12.87 | +8.24% | 18.7B | -184.00 | -$0.07 | +0.76% |
| JHX | $20.15 | +1.36% | 11.7B | 83.98 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $209.73 | +2.42% | 6.6B | 15.83 | $13.24 | +0.49% |
| KNF | $87.12 | -3.52% | 4.9B | 31.55 | $2.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CPAC vs CRH Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while CRH trades at $112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CRH's competition here
CPAC vs VMC Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while VMC trades at $291.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check VMC's competition here
CPAC vs MLM Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while MLM trades at $606.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check MLM's competition here
CPAC vs AMRZ Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while AMRZ trades at $53.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check AMRZ's competition here
CPAC vs CX Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while CX trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas CX's P/E ratio is -184.00. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CX's competition here
CPAC vs JHX Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while JHX trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 83.98. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check JHX's competition here
CPAC vs SUM Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SUM's competition here
CPAC vs EXP Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while EXP trades at $209.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check EXP's competition here
CPAC vs KNF Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while KNF trades at $87.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check KNF's competition here
CPAC vs USLM Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while USLM trades at $106.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USLM's competition here
CPAC vs TTAM Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while TTAM trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TTAM's competition here
CPAC vs BCC Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while BCC trades at $72.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check BCC's competition here
CPAC vs TGLS Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while TGLS trades at $42.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TGLS's competition here
CPAC vs LOMA Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while LOMA trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check LOMA's competition here
CPAC vs SMID Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while SMID trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SMID's competition here
CPAC vs FEAM Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while FEAM trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check FEAM's competition here
CPAC vs CAPS Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while CAPS trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CAPS's competition here
CPAC vs RETO Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 348.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while RETO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check RETO's competition here
CPAC vs USCR Comparison May 2026
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 913.5M. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $10.51, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 17.63, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USCR's competition here