Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while CRH trades at $99.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 79.88. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check CRH's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while VMC trades at $279.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check VMC's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while MLM trades at $559.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check MLM's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while AMRZ trades at $49.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check AMRZ's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while CX trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check CX's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while JHX trades at $26.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check JHX's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while OC trades at $142.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OC's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check OC's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while SUM trades at $52.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check SUM's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while SSD trades at $193.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check SSD's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while BLDR trades at $72.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check BLDR's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while EXP trades at $213.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check EXP's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while KNF trades at $78.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check KNF's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while USLM trades at $110.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to USLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check USLM's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while TTAM trades at $17.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check TTAM's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while BCC trades at $77.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check BCC's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while TGLS trades at $45.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check TGLS's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while LOMA trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 47.02. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check LOMA's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while CPAC trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check CPAC's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RMIX has a market cap of 411.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while RMIX trades at $17.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RMIX's P/E ratio is -250.86. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to RMIX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to RMIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check RMIX's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while SMID trades at $30.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to SMID. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check SMID's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while FGIWW trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check FGIWW's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while CSTE trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check CSTE's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 386K. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while RETO trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check RETO's competition here

Capstone Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CAPS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAPS stands at 1.3M. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAPS is priced at $0.23 on the NASDAQ, while USCR trades at $73.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAPS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, CAPS's ROE is -1.11%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAPS is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAPS.Check USCR's competition here