Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LOMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOMA | $10.61 | -3.89% | 1.2B | 75.61 | $0.14 | N/A |
| CRH | $115.45 | -2.51% | 77.1B | 21.42 | $5.39 | +1.29% |
| VMC | $297.32 | -1.46% | 38.6B | 35.18 | $8.45 | +0.67% |
| MLM | $614.49 | -0.74% | 37.1B | 38.52 | $15.97 | +0.53% |
| AMRZ | $53.38 | -0.74% | 29.5B | 24.94 | $2.14 | +0.83% |
| CX | $12.25 | -0.41% | 17.8B | -175.14 | -$0.07 | +0.73% |
| JHX | $20.71 | -1.33% | 12B | 86.29 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $210.82 | +0.34% | 6.6B | 15.94 | $13.23 | +0.47% |
| KNF | $92.98 | +0.46% | 5.3B | 33.68 | $2.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LOMA vs CRH Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while CRH trades at $115.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CRH's competition here
LOMA vs VMC Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while VMC trades at $297.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check VMC's competition here
LOMA vs MLM Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while MLM trades at $614.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check MLM's competition here
LOMA vs AMRZ Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while AMRZ trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check AMRZ's competition here
LOMA vs CX Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while CX trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas CX's P/E ratio is -175.14. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CX's competition here
LOMA vs JHX Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while JHX trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 86.29. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check JHX's competition here
LOMA vs SUM Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check SUM's competition here
LOMA vs EXP Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while EXP trades at $210.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check EXP's competition here
LOMA vs KNF Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while KNF trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check KNF's competition here
LOMA vs USLM Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while USLM trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check USLM's competition here
LOMA vs TTAM Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while TTAM trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check TTAM's competition here
LOMA vs BCC Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while BCC trades at $78.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check BCC's competition here
LOMA vs TGLS Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while TGLS trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check TGLS's competition here
LOMA vs CPAC Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 912.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while CPAC trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CPAC's competition here
LOMA vs SMID Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while SMID trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check SMID's competition here
LOMA vs FEAM Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while FEAM trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check FEAM's competition here
LOMA vs CAPS Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while CAPS trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CAPS's competition here
LOMA vs RETO Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 368.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while RETO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check RETO's competition here
LOMA vs USCR Comparison May 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $10.61, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 75.61, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check USCR's competition here