Hecla Mining Company (HL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, PAAS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while PAAS trades at $45.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas PAAS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAAS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to PAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check PAAS's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, AG has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while AG trades at $17.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas AG's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to AG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check AG's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, MAG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while MAG trades at $24.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas MAG's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is more volatile compared to MAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check MAG's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while EXK trades at $8.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check EXK's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, SVM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while SVM trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas SVM's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to SVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check SVM's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, HSLV has a market cap of 750.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while HSLV trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas HSLV's P/E ratio is -51.67. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSLV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to HSLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check HSLV's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, DVS has a market cap of 252.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while DVS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas DVS's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DVS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to DVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check DVS's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, BHLLD has a market cap of 188.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while BHLLD trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas BHLLD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHLLD's ROE of +14.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to BHLLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check BHLLD's competition here

HL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HL stands at 11B. In comparison, AXU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HL is priced at $16.46, while AXU trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas AXU's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, HL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HL is less volatile compared to AXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HL.Check AXU's competition here