LendingTree, Inc.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while TPGXL trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check TPGXL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while VOYA-PB trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check VOYA-PB's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while VOYA trades at $71.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check VOYA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BIPH trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BIPH's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while PACS trades at $11.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PACS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while MSDL trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MSDL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYM trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYM's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 633.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BEAGU trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BEAGU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYO trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYO's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ANSCU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 398.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BACQU trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BACQU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BACQU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 339.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while POLEU trades at $10.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check POLEU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while DRDBU trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DRDBU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 278.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while PLMKU trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PLMKU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while HVIIU trades at $10.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check HVIIU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while HVII trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check HVII's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while DMAAU trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DMAAU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while NTWOU trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NTWOU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 250.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while FACTU trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FACTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FACTU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while PLMK trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PLMK's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while DRDB trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DRDB's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYL trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYL's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYP trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYP's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while SVCCU trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SVCCU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 170.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILY trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILY's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILY's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYK trades at $22.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYK's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RANG trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RANG's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYN trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYN's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYN's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while TAVIU trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check TAVIU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYG trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYG's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYT trades at $11.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while ACOG trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ACOG's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BSIIU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while SPHA trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SPHA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while NOEM trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 252.75. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NOEM's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while DTSQ trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DTSQ's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while CAPNU trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CAPNU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RMI trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RMI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while FLDD trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FLDD's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while YHNA trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check YHNA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BAYAU trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BAYAU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while COOTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to COOTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COOTW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while DRDBW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DRDBW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while APLMW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check APLMW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while MLACR trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MLACR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while HVIIR trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HVIIR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check HVIIR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BSLKW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BSLKW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, PLMKW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while PLMKW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PLMKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PLMKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PLMKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PLMKW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while TENKR trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check TENKR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RANGR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RANGR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while NOEMR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NOEMR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while EURKR trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check EURKR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while DTSQR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DTSQR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while CAPNR trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CAPNR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while YHNAR trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check YHNAR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while FSHPR trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FSHPR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 971.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while ATMCR trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATMCR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BRACR trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BRACR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 452K. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while EMCGR trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check EMCGR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYI trades at $25.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LCAAW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while BIPJ trades at $24.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BIPJ's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SPHAR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 664M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $49.06, while RILYH trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYH's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RILYH's competition here