LendingTree, Inc.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 19.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while TPGXL trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while VOYA trades at $69.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 6.60B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while VOYA-PB trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while BIPH trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while MSDL trades at $19.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while PACS trades at $10.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYM trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 626.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while BEAGU trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYO trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 459.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 348.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while BACQU trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BACQU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 318.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while DRDBU trades at $10.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 277.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while HVIIU trades at $10.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 260.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while HVII trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 246.07M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while PLMK trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 245.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while NTWOU trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 240.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while PLMKU trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 235.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while DMAAU trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while DRDB trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 206.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while BSIIU trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 165.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while TAVIU trades at $10.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 163.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RANG trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 157.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while SVCCU trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 134.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while ACOG trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 112.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYT trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while SPHA trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 108.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYK trades at $16.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 106.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYG trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYG's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 103.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYN trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYN's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 101.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILY trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILY's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 95.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while NOEM trades at $9.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is -998.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 91.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RMI trades at $14.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 91.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while DTSQ trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while FLDD trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 79.83M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while YHNA trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 68.67. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 76.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYP trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 74.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while CAPNU trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 74.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RILYL trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RILYL's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while BAYAU trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 46.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while ATMCR trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 9.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while DRDBW trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 5.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while RANGR trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RANGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while MLACR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MLACR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 4.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while APLMW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while TENKR trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while EURKR trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 1.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while NOEMR trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while CAPNR trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 973525.00. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while YHNAR trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 964291.00. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while DTSQR trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 571159.00. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while EMCGR trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536940.00. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while BRACR trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 387732.00. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while HVIIR trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HVIIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 358479.00. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while COOTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to COOTW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 517.18M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 32898.00. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $38.21, while BSLKW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of -9.23, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.