Toyota Motor Corp
Toyota Motor Corp (TOM.HM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TOM.HM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOM.HM | €16.32 | +1.07% | 211.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| TL0.DE | €373.05 | +3.78% | 1.4T | 400.00 | €0.92 | N/A |
| TOM.BE | €18.21 | +0.32% | 237.3B | N/A | N/A | +2.85% |
| TOM.MU | €16.34 | +1.74% | 215.1B | N/A | N/A | +3.15% |
| TOM.SG | €16.44 | +0.87% | 213.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.15% |
| TOM.DU | €16.29 | +1.18% | 212.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| TOM.F | €16.35 | +0.06% | 211.1B | 10.12 | €1.60 | +3.13% |
| BY6.F | €10.20 | +2.47% | 91.7B | 40.23 | €0.25 | +1.57% |
| 8GM.DE | €69.73 | +6.10% | 61.5B | 28.92 | €2.36 | +0.81% |
| 2FE.DE | €307.45 | +3.07% | 52.9B | 33.37 | €9.00 | +1.19% |
Stock Comparison
TOM.HM vs TL0.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while TL0.DE trades at €373.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 400.00. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check TL0.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs TOM.BE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TOM.BE has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while TOM.BE trades at €18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOM.BE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM and TOM.BE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOM.BE's competition here
TOM.HM vs TOM.MU Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TOM.MU has a market cap of 215.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while TOM.MU trades at €16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOM.MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to TOM.MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check TOM.MU's competition here
TOM.HM vs TOM.SG Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 213.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while TOM.SG trades at €16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check TOM.SG's competition here
TOM.HM vs TOM.DU Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while TOM.DU trades at €16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check TOM.DU's competition here
TOM.HM vs TOM.F Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 211.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while TOM.F trades at €16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM and TOM.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOM.F's competition here
TOM.HM vs BY6.F Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while BY6.F trades at €10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check BY6.F's competition here
TOM.HM vs 8GM.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while 8GM.DE trades at €69.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM and 8GM.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8GM.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 2FE.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while 2FE.DE trades at €307.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 2FE.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs FMC1.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while FMC1.DE trades at €12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check FMC1.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs MBG.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while MBG.DE trades at €50.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check MBG.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs VOW.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while VOW.DE trades at €92.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check VOW.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs BMW3.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while BMW3.DE trades at €75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check BMW3.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs BMW.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while BMW.DE trades at €75.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check BMW.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs VOW3.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while VOW3.DE trades at €91.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check VOW3.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs P911.HM Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while P911.HM trades at €46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check P911.HM's competition here
TOM.HM vs P911.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while P911.DE trades at €46.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 98.34. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check P911.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 8TI.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while 8TI.DE trades at €6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 8TI.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs N3IA.F Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while N3IA.F trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check N3IA.F's competition here
TOM.HM vs PAH3.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while PAH3.DE trades at €32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check PAH3.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs RNL.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while RNL.DE trades at €28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check RNL.DE's competition here
TOM.HM vs 0O9.F Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while 0O9.F trades at €2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check 0O9.F's competition here
TOM.HM vs PMAG.DE Comparison May 2026
TOM.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.HM stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.HM is priced at €16.32, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.HM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.HM is less volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.HM.Check PMAG.DE's competition here