Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG (P911.HM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (P911.HM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P911.HM | €46.31 | -0.22% | 42.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TL0.DE | €369.85 | +0.50% | 1.4T | 403.21 | €0.92 | N/A |
| TOM.BE | €18.21 | +0.32% | 237.3B | N/A | N/A | +2.85% |
| TOM.SG | €16.38 | -0.11% | 213.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.12% |
| TOM.HM | €16.30 | +0.37% | 213.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.12% |
| TOM.DU | €16.35 | +0.26% | 213B | N/A | N/A | +3.13% |
| TOM.MU | €16.33 | -1.03% | 212.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.13% |
| TOM.F | €16.38 | +1.11% | 212.4B | 10.19 | €1.60 | +3.14% |
| BY6.F | €10.27 | +1.99% | 92.5B | 40.58 | €0.25 | +1.56% |
| 8GM.DE | €68.50 | +0.35% | 61.8B | 29.03 | €2.36 | +0.79% |
Stock Comparison
P911.HM vs TL0.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while TL0.DE trades at €369.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 403.21. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check TL0.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs TOM.BE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, TOM.BE has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while TOM.BE trades at €18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOM.BE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM and TOM.BE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOM.BE's competition here
P911.HM vs TOM.SG Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 213.9B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while TOM.SG trades at €16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check TOM.SG's competition here
P911.HM vs TOM.HM Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, TOM.HM has a market cap of 213.9B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while TOM.HM trades at €16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOM.HM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM and TOM.HM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOM.HM's competition here
P911.HM vs TOM.DU Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 213B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while TOM.DU trades at €16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check TOM.DU's competition here
P911.HM vs TOM.MU Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, TOM.MU has a market cap of 212.9B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while TOM.MU trades at €16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOM.MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to TOM.MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check TOM.MU's competition here
P911.HM vs TOM.F Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 212.4B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while TOM.F trades at €16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check TOM.F's competition here
P911.HM vs BY6.F Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while BY6.F trades at €10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check BY6.F's competition here
P911.HM vs 8GM.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while 8GM.DE trades at €68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check 8GM.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs 2FE.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while 2FE.DE trades at €290.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 34.51. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check 2FE.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs FMC1.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while FMC1.DE trades at €12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check FMC1.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs MBG.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while MBG.DE trades at €51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check MBG.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs VOW.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while VOW.DE trades at €93.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check VOW.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs BMW3.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while BMW3.DE trades at €75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check BMW3.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs BMW.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while BMW.DE trades at €75.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check BMW.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs VOW3.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while VOW3.DE trades at €91.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check VOW3.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs P911.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while P911.DE trades at €46.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 98.74. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check P911.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs 8TI.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while 8TI.DE trades at €6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check 8TI.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs N3IA.F Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while N3IA.F trades at €4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check N3IA.F's competition here
P911.HM vs PAH3.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while PAH3.DE trades at €32.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check PAH3.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs RNL.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while RNL.DE trades at €29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check RNL.DE's competition here
P911.HM vs 0O9.F Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while 0O9.F trades at €2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -13.73. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check 0O9.F's competition here
P911.HM vs PMAG.DE Comparison May 2026
P911.HM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, P911.HM stands at 42.6B. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, P911.HM is priced at €46.31, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
P911.HM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, P911.HM's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, P911.HM is less volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for P911.HM.Check PMAG.DE's competition here