Porsche Automobil Holding SE
Porsche Automobil Holding SE (PAH3.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAH3.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAH3.DE | €32.79 | +3.05% | 9.9B | 3.53 | €9.16 | +5.94% |
| TL0.DE | €372.95 | +3.76% | 1.4T | 400.00 | €0.92 | N/A |
| TOM.BE | €18.21 | +0.32% | 237.3B | N/A | N/A | +2.85% |
| TOM.MU | €16.34 | +1.74% | 215.1B | N/A | N/A | +3.15% |
| TOM.SG | €16.39 | +0.56% | 213.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.15% |
| TOM.DU | €16.29 | +1.18% | 212.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| TOM.HM | €16.32 | +1.07% | 211.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| TOM.F | €16.35 | +0.06% | 211.1B | 10.12 | €1.60 | +3.13% |
| BY6.F | €10.19 | +2.35% | 91.7B | 40.23 | €0.25 | +1.57% |
| 8GM.DE | €69.73 | +6.10% | 61.5B | 28.92 | €2.36 | +0.81% |
Stock Comparison
PAH3.DE vs TL0.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while TL0.DE trades at €372.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 400.00. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check TL0.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs TOM.BE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOM.BE has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while TOM.BE trades at €18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOM.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOM.BE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check TOM.BE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs TOM.MU Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOM.MU has a market cap of 215.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while TOM.MU trades at €16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOM.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOM.MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check TOM.MU's competition here
PAH3.DE vs TOM.SG Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 213.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while TOM.SG trades at €16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check TOM.SG's competition here
PAH3.DE vs TOM.DU Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while TOM.DU trades at €16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check TOM.DU's competition here
PAH3.DE vs TOM.HM Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOM.HM has a market cap of 211.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while TOM.HM trades at €16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOM.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOM.HM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check TOM.HM's competition here
PAH3.DE vs TOM.F Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 211.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while TOM.F trades at €16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check TOM.F's competition here
PAH3.DE vs BY6.F Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while BY6.F trades at €10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check BY6.F's competition here
PAH3.DE vs 8GM.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while 8GM.DE trades at €69.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check 8GM.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs 2FE.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while 2FE.DE trades at €307.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check 2FE.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs FMC1.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while FMC1.DE trades at €13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check FMC1.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs MBG.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while MBG.DE trades at €50.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check MBG.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs VOW.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while VOW.DE trades at €93.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check VOW.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs BMW3.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while BMW3.DE trades at €75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check BMW3.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs BMW.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while BMW.DE trades at €75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check BMW.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs VOW3.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while VOW3.DE trades at €91.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check VOW3.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs P911.HM Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while P911.HM trades at €46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check P911.HM's competition here
PAH3.DE vs P911.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while P911.DE trades at €46.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 98.34. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check P911.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs 8TI.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while 8TI.DE trades at €6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check 8TI.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs N3IA.F Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while N3IA.F trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check N3IA.F's competition here
PAH3.DE vs RNL.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while RNL.DE trades at €28.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is less volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check RNL.DE's competition here
PAH3.DE vs 0O9.F Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while 0O9.F trades at €2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check 0O9.F's competition here
PAH3.DE vs PMAG.DE Comparison May 2026
PAH3.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAH3.DE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAH3.DE is priced at €32.79, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAH3.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAH3.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAH3.DE is more volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAH3.DE.Check PMAG.DE's competition here