T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS | $182.68 | +0.61% | 197.7B | 19.05 | $9.59 | +2.15% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| VZ | $46.54 | +1.02% | 194.2B | 9.69 | $4.80 | +5.97% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| SPCK | $22.19 | +0.92% | 166.3B | -17.49 | -$1.27 | +16.19% |
| T-PC | $17.75 | -0.34% | 158.7B | 5.92 | $3.00 | +4.94% |
| T-PA | $18.79 | -0.27% | 158.2B | 6.29 | $3.00 | +4.94% |
| T | $22.72 | +1.34% | 157.7B | 10.46 | $2.17 | +4.94% |
| TBB | $20.45 | -0.10% | 125.5B | 6.88 | $2.97 | +4.94% |
| CMCSA | $23.17 | +2.12% | 82.8B | 5.79 | $4.00 | +5.71% |
Stock Comparison
TMUS vs VZA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check VZA's competition here
TMUS vs VZ Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while VZ trades at $46.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check VZ's competition here
TMUS vs TBC Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TBC's competition here
TMUS vs SPCK Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, SPCK has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while SPCK trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas SPCK's P/E ratio is -17.49. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPCK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to SPCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check SPCK's competition here
TMUS vs T-PC Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while T-PC trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check T-PC's competition here
TMUS vs T-PA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while T-PA trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check T-PA's competition here
TMUS vs T Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while T trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas T's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check T's competition here
TMUS vs TBB Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TBB trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TBB's competition here
TMUS vs CMCSA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CMCSA trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CMCSA's competition here
TMUS vs AMX Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while AMX trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check AMX's competition here
TMUS vs AMOV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check AMOV's competition here
TMUS vs CHT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CHT trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CHT's competition here
TMUS vs VOD Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while VOD trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check VOD's competition here
TMUS vs ORAN Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ORAN's competition here
TMUS vs VIV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while VIV trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check VIV's competition here
TMUS vs TEF Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TEF trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TEF's competition here
TMUS vs BCE Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while BCE trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check BCE's competition here
TMUS vs CHTR Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CHTR trades at $133.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CHTR's competition here
TMUS vs RCI Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while RCI trades at $34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check RCI's competition here
TMUS vs TU Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TU trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TU's competition here
TMUS vs ECHO Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ECHO trades at $97.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ECHO's competition here
TMUS vs TIGO Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TIGO trades at $89.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TIGO's competition here
TMUS vs SJR Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check SJR's competition here
TMUS vs TLK Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TLK trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TLK's competition here
TMUS vs LBDAV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBDAV's competition here
TMUS vs LBDKV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBDKV's competition here
TMUS vs SKM Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while SKM trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 217.55. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check SKM's competition here
TMUS vs TIMB Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TIMB trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TIMB's competition here
TMUS vs GSAT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while GSAT trades at $80.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -729.55. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check GSAT's competition here
TMUS vs FYBR Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while FYBR trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check FYBR's competition here
TMUS vs MBT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check MBT's competition here
TMUS vs KT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while KT trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check KT's competition here
TMUS vs LUMN Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LUMN trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LUMN's competition here
TMUS vs USM Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while USM trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check USM's competition here
TMUS vs UZE Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while UZE trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check UZE's competition here
TMUS vs UZF Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while UZF trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check UZF's competition here
TMUS vs UZD Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while UZD trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check UZD's competition here
TMUS vs TEO Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TEO trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TEO's competition here
TMUS vs TKC Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TKC trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TKC's competition here
TMUS vs IRDM Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while IRDM trades at $43.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 43.99. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check IRDM's competition here
TMUS vs LBRDK Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBRDK trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBRDK's competition here
TMUS vs LBRDA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBRDA trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBRDA's competition here
TMUS vs LBYKV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBYKV's competition here
TMUS vs TDS-PV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TDS-PV trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TDS-PV's competition here
TMUS vs LBTYB Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBTYB trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBTYB's competition here
TMUS vs TDS Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TDS trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TDS's competition here
TMUS vs TDS-PU Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TDS-PU trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TDS-PU's competition here
TMUS vs SNRE Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while SNRE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check SNRE's competition here
TMUS vs CTBB Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CTBB trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CTBB's competition here
TMUS vs PHI Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while PHI trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check PHI's competition here
TMUS vs LBTYA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBTYA trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBTYA's competition here
TMUS vs LBTYK Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBTYK trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBTYK's competition here
TMUS vs VEON Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while VEON trades at $51.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS and VEON have similar daily volatility (2.03).Check VEON's competition here
TMUS vs KYIV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while KYIV trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check KYIV's competition here
TMUS vs LILAP Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LILAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LILAP trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LILAP's P/E ratio is -265.34. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LILAP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LILAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LILAP's competition here
TMUS vs AD Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while AD trades at $37.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to AD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check AD's competition here
TMUS vs LBRDP Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LBRDP trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LBRDP's competition here
TMUS vs DISH Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check DISH's competition here
TMUS vs IHS Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while IHS trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check IHS's competition here
TMUS vs UNIT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while UNIT trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check UNIT's competition here
TMUS vs LILKV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LILKV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LILKV trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LILKV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LILKV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LILKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LILKV's competition here
TMUS vs LILA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LILA trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LILA's competition here
TMUS vs LILAK Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LILAK trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LILAK's competition here
TMUS vs ASTSW Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ASTSW's competition here
TMUS vs ATEX Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ATEX trades at $89.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -64.98. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ATEX's competition here
TMUS vs RADI Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check RADI's competition here
TMUS vs IDT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while IDT trades at $57.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check IDT's competition here
TMUS vs TV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while TV trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check TV's competition here
TMUS vs SIFY Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while SIFY trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check SIFY's competition here
TMUS vs LILAV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, LILAV has a market cap of 863.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while LILAV trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas LILAV's P/E ratio is -47.41. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LILAV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LILAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check LILAV's competition here
TMUS vs SHEN Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 854.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while SHEN trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.31. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check SHEN's competition here
TMUS vs ATUS Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ATUS trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ATUS's competition here
TMUS vs OPTU Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 777.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while OPTU trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check OPTU's competition here
TMUS vs GLIBA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 742.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while GLIBA trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check GLIBA's competition here
TMUS vs GLIBK Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 722M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while GLIBK trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check GLIBK's competition here
TMUS vs CCOI Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 671.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CCOI trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCOI's ROE of +4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CCOI's competition here
TMUS vs CNSL Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CNSL's competition here
TMUS vs OOMA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 506.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while OOMA trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check OOMA's competition here
TMUS vs WOW Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while WOW trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check WOW's competition here
TMUS vs GOGO Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 430.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while GOGO trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check GOGO's competition here
TMUS vs ATNI Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 415.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ATNI trades at $27.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -128.71. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ATNI's competition here
TMUS vs RBBN Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while RBBN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RBBN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check RBBN's competition here
TMUS vs CABO Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 296.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CABO trades at $52.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CABO's competition here
TMUS vs HCHC Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -4.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check HCHC's competition here
TMUS vs CXDO Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 234.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while CXDO trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check CXDO's competition here
TMUS vs RDCM Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 224.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while RDCM trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check RDCM's competition here
TMUS vs GLBKV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check GLBKV's competition here
TMUS vs GLBAV Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check GLBAV's competition here
TMUS vs MTSL Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check MTSL's competition here
TMUS vs KYIVW Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while KYIVW trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check KYIVW's competition here
TMUS vs KORE-WT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, KORE-WT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while KORE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas KORE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KORE-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to KORE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check KORE-WT's competition here
TMUS vs UCL Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while UCL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check UCL's competition here
TMUS vs ELWT Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ELWT trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELWT's ROE of +7.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ELWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ELWT's competition here
TMUS vs ANTE Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while ANTE trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check ANTE's competition here
TMUS vs FNGR Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while FNGR trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check FNGR's competition here
TMUS vs MIMO Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check MIMO's competition here
TMUS vs PCLA Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while PCLA trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check PCLA's competition here
TMUS vs QTEK Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check QTEK's competition here
TMUS vs QTEKW Comparison June 2026
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 197.7B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $182.68, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.Check QTEKW's competition here