Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FYBR's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FYBR and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYBR | $38.49 | +0.00% | 9.6B | -25.16 | -$1.53 | N/A |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 6.29 | $4.06 | +5.76% |
| VZ | $48.48 | +0.54% | 202.4B | 10.10 | $4.80 | +5.76% |
| TMUS | $182.61 | -0.42% | 195.9B | 19.06 | $9.58 | +2.16% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| T | $24.89 | +1.26% | 170.5B | 11.47 | $2.17 | +4.46% |
| SPCK | $22.20 | +0.34% | 168.6B | -20.23 | -$1.10 | +16.25% |
| T-PC | $16.96 | -0.12% | 158.6B | 5.65 | $3.00 | +4.46% |
| T-PA | $17.93 | +0.50% | 158.2B | 5.97 | $3.00 | +4.46% |
| TBB | $19.49 | -0.15% | 158B | 6.55 | $2.97 | +4.46% |
Stock Comparison
Verizon Communications, 5.9% 15 Feb 2054 (NYSE: VZA)
FYBR vs VZA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check VZA's competition here
Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ)
FYBR vs VZ Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 202.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while VZ trades at $48.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check VZ's competition here
T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS)
FYBR vs TMUS Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 195.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TMUS trades at $182.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TMUS's competition here
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (NYSE: TBC)
FYBR vs TBC Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TBC's competition here
AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T)
FYBR vs T Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while T trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas T's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check T's competition here
SPAC and New Issue ETF (NASDAQ: SPCK)
FYBR vs SPCK Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SPCK has a market cap of 168.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while SPCK trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas SPCK's P/E ratio is -20.23. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPCK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to SPCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check SPCK's competition here
AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T-PC)
FYBR vs T-PC Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while T-PC trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check T-PC's competition here
AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T-PA)
FYBR vs T-PA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while T-PA trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check T-PA's competition here
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (NYSE: TBB)
FYBR vs TBB Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TBB trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TBB's competition here
Comcast Corporation Class A Common Stock Ex-Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: CMCSV)
FYBR vs CMCSV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CMCSV has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CMCSV trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CMCSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCSV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CMCSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CMCSV's competition here
Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCSA)
FYBR vs CMCSA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CMCSA trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CMCSA's competition here
América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (NYSE: AMX)
FYBR vs AMX Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while AMX trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check AMX's competition here
América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (NYSE: AMOV)
FYBR vs AMOV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check AMOV's competition here
Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (NASDAQ: VOD)
FYBR vs VOD Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while VOD trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check VOD's competition here
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT)
FYBR vs CHT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CHT trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CHT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CHT's competition here
Orange S.A. (NYSE: ORAN)
FYBR vs ORAN Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ORAN's competition here
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTS)
FYBR vs ASTS Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ASTS trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -39.88. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ASTS's competition here
EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: SATS)
FYBR vs SATS Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while SATS trades at $86.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -49.14. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check SATS's competition here
BCE Inc. (NYSE: BCE)
FYBR vs BCE Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while BCE trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check BCE's competition here
Telefónica, S.A. (NYSE: TEF)
FYBR vs TEF Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TEF trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TEF's competition here
Charter Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTR)
FYBR vs CHTR Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CHTR trades at $154.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CHTR's competition here
Rogers Communications Inc. (NYSE: RCI)
FYBR vs RCI Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while RCI trades at $36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check RCI's competition here
Telefônica Brasil S.A. (NYSE: VIV)
FYBR vs VIV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while VIV trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check VIV's competition here
Millicom International Cellular S.A. (NASDAQ: TIGO)
FYBR vs TIGO Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TIGO trades at $93.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TIGO's competition here
Telus Corp (NYSE: TU)
FYBR vs TU Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TU trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TU's competition here
Shaw Communications Inc. (NYSE: SJR)
FYBR vs SJR Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to SJR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check SJR's competition here
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (NYSE: SKM)
FYBR vs SKM Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while SKM trades at $38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check SKM's competition here
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk (NYSE: TLK)
FYBR vs TLK Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TLK trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TLK's competition here
EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: ECHO)
FYBR vs ECHO Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ECHO trades at $91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ECHO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ECHO's competition here
Liberty Broadband Corporation Class A Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: LBDAV)
FYBR vs LBDAV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is similarly volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBDAV's competition here
Liberty Broadband Corporation Class C Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: LBDKV)
FYBR vs LBDKV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBDKV's competition here
Globalstar, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSAT)
FYBR vs GSAT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while GSAT trades at $82.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -175.30. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check GSAT's competition here
Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company (NYSE: MBT)
FYBR vs MBT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check MBT's competition here
KT Corporation (NYSE: KT)
FYBR vs KT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while KT trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check KT's competition here
Qwest Corp. 6.75% NT 57 (NYSE: CTDD)
FYBR vs CTDD Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CTDD trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CTDD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is similarly volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CTDD's competition here
TIM S.A. (NYSE: TIMB)
FYBR vs TIMB Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TIMB trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TIMB's competition here
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: LUMN)
FYBR vs LUMN Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LUMN trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.19. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LUMN's competition here
United States Cellular Corporation (NYSE: USM)
FYBR vs USM Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while USM trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check USM's competition here
Telecom Argentina S.A. (NYSE: TEO)
FYBR vs TEO Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TEO trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TEO's competition here
Iridium Communications Inc. (NASDAQ: IRDM)
FYBR vs IRDM Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while IRDM trades at $50.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 50.71. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check IRDM's competition here
Liberty Broadband Corporation (NASDAQ: LBRDK)
FYBR vs LBRDK Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBRDK trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBRDK's competition here
Liberty Broadband Corporation (NASDAQ: LBRDA)
FYBR vs LBRDA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBRDA trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBRDA's competition here
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (NYSE: TKC)
FYBR vs TKC Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TKC trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TKC's competition here
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (NYSE: TDS-PV)
FYBR vs TDS-PV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TDS-PV trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TDS-PV's competition here
Liberty Global Ltd. (NASDAQ: LBYKV)
FYBR vs LBYKV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is similarly volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBYKV's competition here
PLDT Inc. (NYSE: PHI)
FYBR vs PHI Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while PHI trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check PHI's competition here
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (NYSE: TDS-PU)
FYBR vs TDS-PU Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TDS-PU trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TDS-PU's competition here
Sunrise Communications AG (NASDAQ: SNRE)
FYBR vs SNRE Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while SNRE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -54.59. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is similarly volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check SNRE's competition here
Qwest Corp. NT (NYSE: CTBB)
FYBR vs CTBB Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CTBB trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is similarly volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CTBB's competition here
VEON Ltd. (NASDAQ: VEON)
FYBR vs VEON Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while VEON trades at $57.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check VEON's competition here
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (NYSE: TDS)
FYBR vs TDS Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TDS trades at $35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TDS's competition here
Liberty Global plc (NASDAQ: LBTYB)
FYBR vs LBTYB Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBTYB trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBTYB's competition here
Liberty Global plc (NASDAQ: LBTYK)
FYBR vs LBTYK Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBTYK trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBTYK's competition here
Sunrise Communications AG (NASDAQ: SNREV)
FYBR vs SNREV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SNREV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while SNREV trades at $50.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas SNREV's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNREV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is similarly volatile compared to SNREV. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check SNREV's competition here
Liberty Global plc (NASDAQ: LBTYA)
FYBR vs LBTYA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBTYA trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBTYA's competition here
Liberty Latin America Ltd. 9% Cum Perp Red Pfd Shs Series A When-issued (NASDAQ: LILAP)
FYBR vs LILAP Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LILAP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LILAP trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LILAP's P/E ratio is -81.95. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LILAP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LILAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LILAP's competition here
Liberty Broadband Corporation (NASDAQ: LBRDP)
FYBR vs LBRDP Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LBRDP trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LBRDP's competition here
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (NYSE: UZF)
FYBR vs UZF Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while UZF trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check UZF's competition here
Array Digital Infrastructure Inc (NYSE: AD)
FYBR vs AD Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while AD trades at $35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to AD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check AD's competition here
DISH Network Corporation (NASDAQ: DISH)
FYBR vs DISH Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DISH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check DISH's competition here
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6.250% Senior Notes due 2069 (NYSE: UZD)
FYBR vs UZD Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while UZD trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to UZD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check UZD's competition here
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (NYSE: UZE)
FYBR vs UZE Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while UZE trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check UZE's competition here
Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (NASDAQ: KYIV)
FYBR vs KYIV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while KYIV trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check KYIV's competition here
IHS Holding Limited (NYSE: IHS)
FYBR vs IHS Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while IHS trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check IHS's competition here
Liberty Latin America Ltd. (NASDAQ: LILA)
FYBR vs LILA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LILA trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -17.59. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LILA's competition here
Liberty Latin America Ltd. (NASDAQ: LILAK)
FYBR vs LILAK Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LILAK trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LILAK's competition here
Liberty Latin America Ltd Class C Common Stock Ex-Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: LILKV)
FYBR vs LILKV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LILKV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LILKV trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LILKV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LILKV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LILKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LILKV's competition here
Anterix Inc. (NASDAQ: ATEX)
FYBR vs ATEX Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ATEX trades at $91.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -46.94. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ATEX's competition here
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTSW)
FYBR vs ASTSW Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ASTSW's competition here
IDT Corporation (NYSE: IDT)
FYBR vs IDT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while IDT trades at $66.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check IDT's competition here
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (NYSE: TV)
FYBR vs TV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TV trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TV's competition here
Radius Global Infrastructure, Inc. (NASDAQ: RADI)
FYBR vs RADI Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to RADI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check RADI's competition here
Liberty Latin America Ltd Class A Common Stock Ex-Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: LILAV)
FYBR vs LILAV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LILAV has a market cap of 863.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while LILAV trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas LILAV's P/E ratio is -47.41. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LILAV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to LILAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check LILAV's competition here
Altice USA, Inc. (NYSE: ATUS)
FYBR vs ATUS Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ATUS trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ATUS's competition here
Telesat Corporation (NASDAQ: TSAT)
FYBR vs TSAT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 749M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while TSAT trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check TSAT's competition here
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (NASDAQ: SHEN)
FYBR vs SHEN Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 734.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while SHEN trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -16.59. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check SHEN's competition here
Ooma, Inc. (NYSE: OOMA)
FYBR vs OOMA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 572.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while OOMA trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check OOMA's competition here
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCOI)
FYBR vs CCOI Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 566.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CCOI trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCOI's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CCOI's competition here
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNSL)
FYBR vs CNSL Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CNSL's competition here
ATN International, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATNI)
FYBR vs ATNI Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 487.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ATNI trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATNI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ATNI's competition here
WideOpenWest, Inc. (NYSE: WOW)
FYBR vs WOW Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while WOW trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check WOW's competition here
Optimum Communications, Inc. (NYSE: OPTU)
FYBR vs OPTU Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 432.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while OPTU trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check OPTU's competition here
Gogo Inc. (NASDAQ: GOGO)
FYBR vs GOGO Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 382.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while GOGO trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check GOGO's competition here
Qwest Corp. 6.5% Sr Nts 01/09/2051 Usd25 (NYSE: CTGG)
FYBR vs CTGG Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CTGG has a market cap of 338.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CTGG trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CTGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CTGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CTGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CTGG's competition here
HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC)
FYBR vs HCHC Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check HCHC's competition here
Qwest Corp. 6.75% Sr Nts 15/06/2052 Usd25 (NYSE: CTHH)
FYBR vs CTHH Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CTHH has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CTHH trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CTHH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CTHH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CTHH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CTHH's competition here
Crexendo, Inc. (NASDAQ: CXDO)
FYBR vs CXDO Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CXDO trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CXDO's competition here
Cable One, Inc. (NYSE: CABO)
FYBR vs CABO Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while CABO trades at $34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check CABO's competition here
RADCOM Ltd. (NASDAQ: RDCM)
FYBR vs RDCM Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 175.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while RDCM trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check RDCM's competition here
GCI Liberty, Inc. Series C GCI Group Common Stock When Issued (NASDAQ: GLBKV)
FYBR vs GLBKV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check GLBKV's competition here
GCI Liberty, Inc. Series A GCI Group Common Stock When Issued (NASDAQ: GLBAV)
FYBR vs GLBAV Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check GLBAV's competition here
Liberty Capital Corporation (NASDAQ: GLIBK)
FYBR vs GLIBK Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while GLIBK trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check GLIBK's competition here
Liberty Capital Corporation (NASDAQ: GLIBA)
FYBR vs GLIBA Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while GLIBA trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check GLIBA's competition here
Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. (NASDAQ: MTSL)
FYBR vs MTSL Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check MTSL's competition here
KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KORE-WT)
FYBR vs KORE-WT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KORE-WT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while KORE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas KORE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KORE-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to KORE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check KORE-WT's competition here
Kyivstar Group Ltd. Warrant (NASDAQ: KYIVW)
FYBR vs KYIVW Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while KYIVW trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check KYIVW's competition here
Elauwit Connection, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: ELWT)
FYBR vs ELWT Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ELWT trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELWT's ROE of +7.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ELWT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ELWT's competition here
Old Market Capital Corporation (NASDAQ: OMCC)
FYBR vs OMCC Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while OMCC trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check OMCC's competition here
AirNet Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: ANTE)
FYBR vs ANTE Comparison August 2026
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FYBR) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FYBR stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, FYBR is priced at $38.49 on the NASDAQ, while ANTE trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -25.16, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, FYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FYBR is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FYBR.Check ANTE's competition here