Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while VZA trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VZA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 209.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while VZ trades at $50.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VZ's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TMUS trades at $181.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TMUS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TBC trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TBC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 175.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while T trades at $25.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas T's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check T's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 157.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TBB trades at $19.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TBB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 156.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while T-PC trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check T-PC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while T-PA trades at $17.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check T-PA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CMCSV has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CMCSV trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CMCSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CMCSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CMCSV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CMCSA trades at $26.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CMCSA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while AMX trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check AMX's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while AMOV trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check AMOV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while VOD trades at $16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -20.01. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VOD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ORAN trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ORAN's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ASTS trades at $62.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -35.01. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ASTS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while SATS trades at $86.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -49.14. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SATS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while BCE trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check BCE's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TEF trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TEF's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CHTR trades at $151.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CHTR's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while RCI trades at $37.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check RCI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while VIV trades at $11.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VIV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CCZ trades at $66.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CCZ's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TIGO trades at $94.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TIGO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TU trades at $9.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TU's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while SJR trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SJR's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while SKM trades at $38.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SKM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TLK trades at $14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TLK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ECHO trades at $89.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECHO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ECHO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBDAV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBDKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while GSAT trades at $82.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -175.19. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GSAT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while FYBR trades at $38.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check FYBR's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while KT trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while MBT trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check MBT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TIMB trades at $18.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TIMB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CTDD trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTDD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTDD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LUMN trades at $6.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LUMN's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while USM trades at $77.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check USM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TEO trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TEO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBRDK trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBRDK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBRDA trades at $35.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBRDA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while IRDM trades at $47.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 53.35. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check IRDM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while VEON trades at $64.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VEON's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TKC trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TKC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TDS-PV trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TDS-PV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBYKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TDS-PU trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TDS-PU's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TDS trades at $37.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TDS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while SNRE trades at $55.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -54.59. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SNRE's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CTBB trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTBB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while PHI trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check PHI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBTYB trades at $12.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBTYB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBTYK trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBTYK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBTYA trades at $10.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBTYA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, SNREV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while SNREV trades at $50.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas SNREV's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNREV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to SNREV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SNREV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LILAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LILAP trades at $20.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LILAP's P/E ratio is -81.21. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILAP's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while AD trades at $38.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to AD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check AD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while KYIV trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KYIV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LBRDP trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBRDP's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while UZF trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check UZF's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while DISH trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DISH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check DISH's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while UZD trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check UZD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while UZE trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check UZE's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while IHS trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check IHS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LILAK trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILAK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LILA trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LILKV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LILKV trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LILKV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILKV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ASTSW's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while IDT trades at $68.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check IDT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ATEX trades at $86.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -44.24. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ATEX's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while RADI trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check RADI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TV trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while SIFY trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SIFY's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ITRN trades at $51.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ITRN's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, LILAV has a market cap of 863.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while LILAV trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas LILAV's P/E ratio is -47.41. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILAV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ATUS trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ATUS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 697M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while SHEN trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SHEN's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while TSAT trades at $44.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TSAT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 637.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while OOMA trades at $23.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check OOMA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CNSL trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CNSL's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 503.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CCOI trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCOI's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CCOI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while OPTU trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check OPTU's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 475.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ATNI trades at $30.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATNI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ATNI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while WOW trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check WOW's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 384.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while GOGO trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GOGO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CTGG has a market cap of 338.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CTGG trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CTGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CTGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTGG's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while HCHC trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check HCHC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CTHH has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CTHH trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CTHH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTHH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CTHH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTHH's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CXDO trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CXDO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while RDCM trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check RDCM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while CABO trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CABO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLBKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLBAV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while GLIBK trades at $26.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLIBK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while GLIBA trades at $26.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLIBA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while MTSL trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check MTSL's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, KORE-WT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while KORE-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas KORE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to KORE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KORE-WT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while KYIVW trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KYIVW's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 34B. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.82 on the NYSE, while ELWT trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.49, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELWT's ROE of -41.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to ELWT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ELWT's competition here