HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while VZA trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check VZA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 187.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while VZ trades at $45.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check VZ's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TBC trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TBC's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TMUS trades at $158.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TMUS's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 156.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TBB trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TBB's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while T trades at $22.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check T's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while T-PA trades at $16.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check T-PA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 155.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while T-PC trades at $15.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check T-PC's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CMCSV has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CMCSV trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMCSV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CMCSV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CMCSV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CMCSA trades at $22.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CMCSA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while AMX trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check AMX's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while AMOV trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check AMOV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CHT trades at $48.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CHT's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while VOD trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -19.08. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check VOD's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ORAN trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ORAN's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TMUSL has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TMUSL trades at $20.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TMUSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TMUSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TMUSL's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TEF trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TEF's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while VIV trades at $13.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check VIV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TMUSI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TMUSI trades at $18.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TMUSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TMUSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TMUSI's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while BCE trades at $20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check BCE's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while RCI trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check RCI's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CCZ trades at $65.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CCZ's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ASTS trades at $38.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ASTS's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CHTR trades at $111.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CHTR's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SJR trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SJR's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TU trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TU's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ECHO trades at $85.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ECHO's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TIGO trades at $79.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TIGO's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBDAV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBDKV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TLK trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TLK's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SKM trades at $30.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SKM's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while GSAT trades at $82.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -175.28. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check GSAT's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while FYBR trades at $38.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check FYBR's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TIMB trades at $19.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TIMB's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while MBT trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check MBT's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CTDD trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CTDD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CTDD's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while KT trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check KT's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while USM trades at $77.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check USM's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TEO trades at $12.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TEO's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while VEON trades at $79.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check VEON's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBRDA trades at $35.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBRDA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while IRDM trades at $43.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 49.76. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check IRDM's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LUMN trades at $4.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LUMN's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBRDK trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBRDK's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBYKV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while PHI trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check PHI's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TKC trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TKC's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SNRE trades at $55.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -54.59. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SNRE's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CTBB trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CTBB's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TDS trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TDS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TDS's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TDS-PV trades at $17.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TDS-PV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TDS-PU trades at $18.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TDS-PU's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBTYB trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBTYB's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SNREV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SNREV trades at $50.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNREV's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SNREV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to SNREV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SNREV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while DISH trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DISH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check DISH's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LILAP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LILAP trades at $19.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAP's P/E ratio is -75.18. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LILAP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to LILAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LILAP's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while KYIV trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check KYIV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while AD trades at $33.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to AD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check AD's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while UZD trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check UZD's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while UZF trades at $15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check UZF's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while UZE trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check UZE's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBTYK trades at $8.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBTYK's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBTYA trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBTYA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LILKV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LILKV trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILKV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LILKV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LILKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LILKV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LILA trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LILA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LILAK trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -16.55. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LILAK's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while IDT trades at $83.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check IDT's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ASTSW's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while RADI trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check RADI's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ATEX trades at $73.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -37.52. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ATEX's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TV trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 999.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ITRN trades at $50.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ITRN's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LILAV has a market cap of 863.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LILAV trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAV's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LILAV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to LILAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LILAV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 858.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while GLIBK trades at $21.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check GLIBK's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 848.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SIFY trades at $11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SIFY's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 847.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while GLIBA trades at $21.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check GLIBA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ATUS trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ATUS's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 662.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SATS trades at $94.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SATS's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 610.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TSAT trades at $40.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TSAT's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 570.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SHEN trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SHEN's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CNSL trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CNSL's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 543.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while OOMA trades at $19.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check OOMA's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while WOW trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check WOW's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 403.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while ATNI trades at $26.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ATNI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check ATNI's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, TMUSZ has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while TMUSZ trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUSZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TMUSZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to TMUSZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check TMUSZ's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 373.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CCOI trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CCOI's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CCOI's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 285.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while GOGO trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check GOGO's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CTGG has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CTGG trades at $13.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CTGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CTGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CTGG's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CTHH has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CTHH trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTHH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CTHH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CTHH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CTHH's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 190M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CXDO trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CXDO's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while RDCM trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check RDCM's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while OPTU trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check OPTU's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while LBRDP trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check LBRDP's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, CHTRP has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while CHTRP trades at $21.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHTRP's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CHTRP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is more volatile compared to CHTRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check CHTRP's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, SAIQ has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while SAIQ trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIQ's P/E ratio is 58.15. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SAIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to SAIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check SAIQ's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check GLBKV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check GLBAV's competition here

HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HCHC stands at 288.4M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, HCHC is priced at $3.68 on the NYSE, while MTSL trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HCHC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, HCHC's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCHC is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCHC.Check MTSL's competition here